How Trump's hush money trial verdict could affect the 2024 election
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2024]
By Tim Reid
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Jurors hearing the first-ever criminal trial of a
former U.S. president could render their verdict in Donald Trump's hush
money case as soon as next week, with potentially big implications for
the 2024 White House race.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records
to cover up a payment that bought the silence of porn star Stormy
Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. Daniels had threatened to go
public with her account of an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump,
a liaison he denies.
The New York case is widely seen as the least consequential of the four
criminal prosecutions Trump faces. But it has meant the Republican
presidential candidate spent more time in court than campaigning in
recent weeks, and brought outsized attention to the only case likely to
go to trial before his Nov. 5 election face-off with Democratic
President Joe Biden.
Here is how three potential outcomes from the jury room -- a guilty
verdict, an acquittal or a hung jury -- could affect the presidential
campaign.
GUILTY
Opinion polls show a guilty verdict could pose significant political
danger for Trump in an election that will potentially be decided by just
tens of thousands of votes in a handful of battleground states.
One in four Republicans said they would not vote for Trump if he is
found guilty in a criminal trial, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll of
registered voters in April. In the same survey, 60% of independents said
they would not vote for Trump if he is convicted of a crime.
Republican and Democratic consultants have mixed views about the impact
of a guilty verdict.
Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, doubts that as many as a fourth of
Republicans would actually shun Trump if he's convicted. But Ayres said
even if just a small number of more moderate Republicans and
independents are turned off by a guilty verdict, it could help Biden in
a close election.
However, Ayres said the nature of the New York case, which was brought
by a Democratic prosecutor and relies on untested legal strategies, will
help Trump and fellow Republicans frame a guilty verdict as a political
hit job.
"If I were trying to design a court case that would be easy for
Republicans to dismiss as a partisan witch hunt, I would design exactly
the case that's being brought in New York," Ayres said.
Republican consultant Tricia McLaughlin, who worked on former Trump
primary challenger Vivek Ramaswamy's campaign, said she thought a guilty
verdict would have a psychological impact on Trump because he hates
losing. It would also divert more financial resources to legal bills
because he would be almost certain to appeal a guilty verdict, she
added.
Bill Galston, an analyst and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution
think tank in Washington, said he didn't expect a guilty verdict would
have a significant impact on the presidential race.
"In the end, this amounts to lying about sex. I think the view probably
of the majority of Americans is that everybody lies about sex," said
Galston, who has worked on Democratic presidential campaigns.
He also served in the administration of President Bill Clinton, whose
1990s tenure in the White House was marked by sex scandals.
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the end of the day
during his hush money trial at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York
City, New York, U.S. May 21, 2024. Michael M. Santiago/Pool via
REUTERS/File Photo
NOT GUILTY
Consultants from across the political spectrum agree on one thing:
An acquittal would be a huge victory for Trump, especially because
he has claimed the trial is a sham political persecution aimed at
derailing his presidential bid.
On the campaign trail, the candidate could use a not-guilty verdict
in New York to claim the other cases against him also have no legal
merit, McLaughlin said.
Trump faces federal and state charges in Washington and Georgia of
trying to overturn his 2020 loss to Biden and federal charges in
Florida of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White
House in 2021. He has pleaded not guilty in all three cases.
"It's great fodder for him," McLaughlin said. "He will say, 'I won
this sham trial, this witch hunt in New York, and that's what's
going to happen with the other trials.'"
Reuters/Ipsos has not polled on how an acquittal would affect
voters' views of the presidential race.
Karen Finney, a Democratic consultant who worked in the Clinton
White House, said for Trump's core supporters "an acquittal will
make them feel vindicated and validated."
But she said the lurid details that came out in trial testimony and
the case's central allegation - that Trump arranged a hush money
payment to a porn star - could still damage him even if jurors find
him not guilty.
"What's come out during the case could turn off these suburban women
that Trump still has a problem with," Finney said, although she said
he would play an acquittal as a "huge victory."
HUNG JURY
If the 12 jurors hearing Trump's case can't agree on an unanimous
verdict, the result will be a hung jury and the judge will have to
declare a mistrial, legal experts say.
Trump will spin a mistrial as a victory, the political consultants
and analysts said, but without the validation that an acquittal
would give him.
The trial has kept Trump in the news, something he likes, said John
Feehery, a Republican consultant who has worked for congressional
leaders. A mistrial would end that, he said, while simultaneously
not giving Trump a "clean bill of health."
Democratic consultant Finney said that, whatever the verdict, Trump
is expected to then be free of a gag order imposed by the trial
judge. She expects Trump to lash out at his perceived enemies in
even harsher ways once the trial concludes.
Regardless of a hung jury, Finney added, the tawdry facts of the
case are now in the public domain. A mistrial will also tell voters
that at least some jurors believed Trump was guilty, she said.
(Reporting by Tim Reid; Editing by Colleen Jenkins and Jonathan
Oatis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |