Harris team warns CEOs that Trump is a threat to economy, while Trump
says tariffs can drive growth
Send a link to a friend
[November 02, 2024] By
JOSH BOAK and FATIMA HUSSEIN
WASHINGTON (AP) — Kamala Harris ' campaign is actively warning business
leaders that Donald Trump has a pattern of disregard for democracy and
the rule of law that would threaten U.S. economic growth — a closing
argument designed to show the possible consequences for companies and
workers if he returns to the White House.
It’s a position that Trump's team rejects as they tell voters that
prices will be lower and growth stronger than ever before if he wins
Tuesday's election. As a billionaire who made his name in real estate,
the former president has argued for higher tariffs to bring more
factories into the United States and tax cuts for the wealthy and
corporations on the premise that will lead to more investment.
The rival positions get at a fundamental distinction between the two
candidates on how to guide the world’s largest economy: Harris’ team is
arguing that the rule of law creates the certainty that can make markets
and workers thrive, while Trump is arguing that tariff increases and tax
cuts are the keys for growth.
Gene Sperling, who has guided three Democratic presidents on economic
policy and is now advising the Harris campaign, has made what he
describes as a “common sense” case to financiers and others about the
dangers of a second Trump administration.
“A president who targets people, targets CEOs, targets companies,
targets journalists and targets opposition could have a devastating
impact on the investment confidence that has been robust for the past
four years but also part of America’s strength since its founding,” said
Sperling.
But the billionaire hedge fund investor John Paulson, a Trump supporter
who sees himself as a possible treasury secretary, pushes back against
the Harris campaign's criticisms by saying the world was more stable
under Trump and inflation was lower.
“It’s completely false," he said of Sperling's argument about the rule
of law being at risk. "When people make these claims, they’re totally
spurious. They’re not grounded in reality. Trump is a brilliant
businessman. He wants to bring down wasteful spending and encourage
growth.”
Trump has derided his opponent's handling of the economy as “stupid” and
claimed the stock market will crash if he loses the election, although
the S&P 500 index of stocks has increased roughly 50% during President
Joe Biden 's term.
“We will give our companies the lowest taxes, the lowest energy cost,
the lowest regulatory burdens, and free access to the best and biggest
market on the planet,” Trump said at a rally Tuesday in Allentown,
Pennsylvania. “The problem is, if we had more of these idiots running
our country, you won’t have a big and best market anymore because we’re
a nation in decline.”
The Harris team's push involves connecting the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection
at the U.S. Capitol with Trump's history of using the bully pulpit to
attack the Federal Reserve as well as companies such as Amazon, Merck,
Comcast, John Deere and Toyota. Their argument is that companies are
less likely to make long-term investments if democratic values are under
attack and election results denied.
In addition to Sperling, corporate executives have been hearing from
Robert Rubin, the former treasury secretary; Kenneth Chenault, the
former CEO of American Express; and Brian Deese, the former National
Economic Council director for Biden.
One person familiar with the conversations said that the representatives
of the Harris campaign are not having to push hard on this issue.
Seemingly apolitical CEOs are privately raising this issue as their
central concern about a Trump presidency, with the person insisting on
anonymity to describe the private conversations with business leaders
who want to stay out of the electoral spotlight.
[to top of second column] |
But Vanessa Williamson, a senior fellow in governance at the Brookings
Institution, said that the Harris campaign has somewhat underplayed the
risks given the possible hazards.
“By and large, Americans have been able to take the basic rule of law
for granted,” Williamson said. “The kind of rampant cronyism and fraud
that is endemic in some other countries has really been unimaginable
here — and that’s a great thing, of course. But it also makes it
difficult for people to conceive of just how important government is for
the functioning of markets.”
Both campaigns are vying for support from the business community. Trump
has the backing of billionaire Elon Musk, the owner of Tesla, SpaceX and
X, the social media platform previously known as Twitter. Billionaires
such as Microsoft founder Bill Gates and billionaire entrepreneur Mark
Cuban are backing Harris.
Many of the disputes have centered on policy differences. Trump has said
that the higher corporate tax rates favored by Harris would deter
investment, while the Harris team has attacked his plans to remove
Biden-era incentives for building computer chip, electric vehicle and
other advanced factories as costing the country factory jobs.
But the argument about the importance of democratic values picked up
credibility in October after the Nobel memorial prize in economics was
awarded to three economists, Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James
Robinson, who showed that social institutions and the rule of law are
critical for economic growth.
Acemoglu was among the 23 Nobel prize-winning economists who signed a
letter saying Trump's economic plans would “lead to higher prices,
larger deficits, and greater inequality.”
The letter said: “Among the most important determinants of economic
success are the rule of law and economic and political certainty, and
Trump threatens all of these.”
The topic has long fascinated Harris, a former California attorney
general. Two people working in the White House recalled that in 2022,
Harris asked for economic research to back her own understanding that
the erosion of democratic standards would harm growth. Those people
insisted on anonymity to discuss the request.
Similarly, Biden was the nominee, White House chief of staff Jeff Zients
made the case to the CEOs in the Business Roundtable that a Trump return
to the presidency would generate uncertainty that would hinder growth.
It was a pitch that contrasted with Trump floating additional tax cuts
to the group.
Neither the Business Roundtable nor the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have
made endorsements in November's presidential election. The Business
Roundtable has made keeping corporate tax rates at their current 21%
rate its top legislative priority. Trump has pledged further cuts to the
corporate rate for U.S. manufacturers, whereas Harris would like to
raise it to 28%, an increase though still lower than the 35% rate in
place until 2017.
The Chamber, meanwhile, has emphasized its willingness to advocate for
its corporate members with whichever administration would be in power.
Business Roundtable CEO Josh Bolten said in a statement this month that
the organization supported the peaceful transfer of power. So far, Trump
has declined to commit to the peaceful transfer of power, after having
falsely claimed that his 2020 loss was the result of a rigged election,
a claim that helped encourage the 2021 insurrection.
“It can take time to finalize election results, and we urge all
Americans to respect the processes set out in federal and state laws for
electoral determinations and an orderly transition," Bolten said.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|