Russia grinds deeper into Ukraine after 1,000 days of grueling war
Send a link to a friend
[November 18, 2024]
By HANNA ARHIROVA
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — When Russian tanks rolled into Ukraine in February
2022, the conventional wisdom was that the capital, Kyiv, would soon
fall and the rest of the country wouldn’t last long against a much
larger enemy.
Instead, it was that narrative that quickly collapsed. The Ukrainian
army proved it could slow the advance of Russia’s forces and, if not
drive them out completely, then – with enough support from the West – at
least forestall defeat.
But nearly three years later, the outlook is again grim. Russia is
expending huge amounts of weaponry and human life to make
small-but-steady territorial gains to the nearly one-fifth of Ukraine it
already controls. Ukraine, meanwhile, is struggling to minimize losses,
maintain morale and convince allies that, with more military aid, it can
turn the tide.
As this brutal war of attrition grinds toward its 1,000th day, neither
side seems eager to negotiate. President-elect Donald Trump has said he
could quickly end the war, though it is unclear how or in whose favor he
might tip the scales.
This backdrop appears to be driving Russia’s strategy in eastern
Ukraine, according to Phillips O’Brien, a professor of strategic studies
at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland. Trump could try to force an
end to the war by halting the supply of weapons to Ukraine, he said.
“If Trump cuts aid to Ukraine and a cease-fire leads to a frozen
conflict, Russia wants to secure as much territory as it can now,”
O’Brien said.
For Ukraine, the key to any cease-fire would be guarantees from the West
that it won't allow Russia to re-invade in the future. Otherwise,
O'Brien said, “a cease-fire is a recipe for constant instability in
Europe.”
Russia is advancing slowly but steadily in eastern Ukraine
In the war's first year, Ukraine lost huge amounts of territory — but it
also achieved notable victories. It resisted a much larger adversary
with superior air power to survive as an independent country, and it
reclaimed some land through gutsy counteroffensives, giving the underdog
— and its wealthy allies — the confidence to stay in the fight.
In the second year, which was punctuated by Ukraine's devastating loss
of Bakhmut and its failed counteroffensive, the armies essentially
fought to a standstill along a 1,000 kilometer (620 mile) front line.
Toward the end of that year, the U.S. Congress delayed the approval of a
$61 billion package of aid for weapons, and economic and humanitarian
assistance.
With Ukraine's ammunition dwindling, its outlook deteriorated
significantly as the war’s third year began. In February 2024, the town
of Avdiivka fell after months of airstrikes by Russia, which used highly
destructive Soviet-era bombs retrofitted with navigation systems.
The fall of Avdiivka created a major breach in Ukraine’s defenses. When
Russia later mounted an assault on the northeastern city of Kharkiv,
Ukrainian troops were stretched further.
A bright spot for Ukraine came in August, when it launched a surprise
incursion into Russia. It took — and still holds — hundreds of square
kilometers in the Kursk region. While this could be an important chip in
any cease-fire negotiations, it hasn't stopped Russian forces from
taking more land in Ukraine's east.
“The Russians have paid a very high price to keep advancing, but they’re
willing to pay that price in lives to gain a few more meters of
territory each day,” said Justin Crump, head of the British strategic
advisory firm Sibylline.
Tens of thousands of soldiers from both countries have been killed since
the start of the war in 2022, according to estimates, and the U.N. says
at least 11,700 Ukrainian civilians have been killed.
While the amount of land Russia has gained in 2024 — about 2,455 square
kilometers (948 square miles)— is equal to less than 1% of Ukraine’s
pre-war territory, it is having a psychological impact.
With Ukraine in retreat, “we’ve now returned to a period reminiscent of
the (war's) first months,” said Mykola Bielieskov, an analyst at CBA
Initiatives Center in Kyiv. “This strengthens Russia’s position — not so
much militarily, but in terms of morale.”
A war of attrition requires both sides to seek outside resources
To keep its war machine going, Russia — like Ukraine — has turned to
allies for help.
[to top of second column]
|
An explosion is seen in an apartment building after Russian's army
tank fires in Mariupol, Ukraine, Friday, March 11, 2022. (AP Photo/Evgeniy
Maloletka, File)
Iran supplies Russia with drones and possibly missiles, and North
Korea has sent ammunition — and even troops, who have been deployed
to Russia's Kursk region.
Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed this year that 700,000 of
his troops are fighting in Ukraine. Analysts say Putin would need a
much larger force to accelerate Russia’s advance, but that he is
unlikely to mobilize more troops because it could stoke internal
discontent.
Ukraine’s foothold in Kursk is another complicating factor for
Putin, and it could be used as a bargaining chip in any future
cease-fire negotiations.
Captain Yevhen Karas, a Ukrainian commander in Kursk, said the
fighting inside Russia is highly dynamic, but he believes it will
prove effective in diverting Russia's attention and resources.
“Even a creeping, retreating front exhausts the enemy
significantly,” Karas said.
Ukraine has asked the West for longer range missiles and its
blessing to fire at air bases deep inside Russia. But its allies
have so far resisted, wary of escalating tensions with a
nuclear-armed Russia.
The U.S. has provided more than $64 billion in military aid to
Ukraine since the war began 1,000 days ago. Soldiers worry about
what would happen without sustained American support.
“Bravery, heroism, and spirit alone are not enough,” said a
Ukrainian soldier in the eastern Donetsk region who spoke on
condition of anonymity, in line with military rules.
The soldier estimated that where he is stationed Russian infantry
outnumber Ukrainian troops 10 to 1. As the war drags on and the
death toll rises, it has become increasingly difficult for Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to keep replacing troops.
The US will play a vital role in determining the war's next
direction
What direction the war takes next will depend in large part on how
the incoming Trump administration plays its hand.
Trump, who has touted his good relationship with President Vladimir
Putin and called the Russian leader “pretty smart” for invading
Ukraine, has repeatedly criticized American backing of Ukraine.
During his only campaign debate with Vice President Kamala Harris,
Trump twice refused to directly answer a question about whether he
wanted Ukraine to win — raising concerns that Kyiv could be forced
to accept unfavorable terms in any negotiations.
Without security guarantees from the West, Ukraine could find itself
vulnerable to future Russian aggression. Analysts say a cease-fire
based on the current state of the battlefield would set a dangerous
precedent, implying that Europe's borders are up for grabs through
military action — something that hasn’t happened since World War II.
“This would also have a lot of traction in countries like China,
India, and elsewhere,” said Richard Connolly, a Russia expert at the
Royal United Services Institute in London. “They could present that
as a strategic defeat not only for Ukraine, but also for the West.”
As another winter of war approaches, Ukrainian soldiers say they
remain resolute.
“We are standing strong, giving it our all, and we won’t surrender,”
said a battalion chief of staff in the southern region of
Zaporizhzhia. “The most important thing now is not to lose more
land.”
___
Associated Press journalist Volodymyr Yurchuk contributed to this
report.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |