| 
		Amazon and Elon Musk's SpaceX challenge labor agency's constitutionality 
		in federal court
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 19, 2024]  By 
		HALELUYA HADERO 
		Attorneys for Amazon and Elon Musk’s SpaceX argued in a federal appeals 
		court Monday that the National Labor Relations Board’s structure is 
		unconstitutional, advancing a legal fight that may last into the Trump 
		administration where Musk is expected to oversee bureaucratic 
		cost-cutting.
 A panel of three judges at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New 
		Orleans heard separate oral arguments in the SpaceX and Amazon lawsuits, 
		which the two companies initiated after the labor agency filed 
		complaints against them in disputes about workers’ rights and union 
		organizing.
 
 A ruling in favor of the companies could immensely diminish – or 
		paralyze - the nearly century-old agency, which is tasked with enforcing 
		labor laws and settling labor-related complaints workers lodge against 
		their employers. The issue may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, 
		which has a conservative majority and has issued rulings curbing the 
		power of government agencies,
 
 The three appellate judges who heard Monday's arguments questioned the 
		legal maneuvering by Amazon and SpaceX to get their cases to the 5th 
		Circuit, where jurists nominated by Republican presidents dominate the 
		appeals court.
 
		
		 
		A lawyer for the NLRB emphasized during the hearing that both companies 
		filed their appeals after lower courts did not give rulings by requested 
		deadlines.
 Michael E. Kenneally, an attorney for SpaceX, retorted that the 
		government was “relying so much on the procedural objections” because of 
		the alleged weakness of its legal argument, a claim that elicited some 
		pushback from the panel.
 
 “That sounds to me like the argument ‘procedure doesn’t matter if I win 
		on the merits,’” Judge James E. Graves Jr., an appointee of former 
		President Barack Obama, said.
 
 SpaceX, Musk's space technology company, filed its lawsuit against the 
		NLRB in January after the labor agency accused the company of unlawfully 
		firing employees who wrote an open letter critical of Musk and of 
		creating the impression worker activities were being surveilled.
 
 Among other claims, the company argued in its complaint that agency 
		proceedings deprived it of the right to a trial by a jury.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Elon Musk speaks after President-elect Donald Trump spoke during an 
			America First Policy Institute gala at his Mar-a-Lago estate, 
			Thursday, Nov. 14, 2024, in Palm Beach, Fla. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) 
            
			
			
			 Musk, the world’s richest person, 
			has become more influential in the past few months after pumping an 
			estimated $200 million through his political action committee to 
			help elect Donald Trump as president.
 After he was elected, Trump tapped Musk and former GOP presidential 
			candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a new efficiency commission 
			focused on cutting costs across the federal government. Musk has 
			said the new administration will have a “mandate to delete the 
			mountain of choking regulations that do not serve the greater good.”
 
 Amazon's lawsuit against the NLRB is tied to the company’s 
			objections to a union election that took place at a warehouse in New 
			York City in April 2022. The retail giant has accused the agency of 
			improperly interfering in that election, partly by bringing a 
			lawsuit against the company to reinstate a fired organizer close to 
			when voting began.
 
 The Amazon Labor Union ultimately won the election to represent 
			workers, but Amazon has refused to come to the negotiating table.
 
 The company’s attorneys argued in the lawsuit that the NLRB board 
			members who authorized the agency’s complaint later “acted as 
			judges” by denying a review of Amazon's objections, which also came 
			before them. Amazon's lawyers maintained the agency’s structure was 
			unconstitutional because board members are shielded from removal by 
			the U.S. president, among other things.
 
 In a statement issued before Monday's hearing, NLRB General Counsel 
			Jennifer Abruzzo said it was “nothing new for big companies to 
			challenge the authority of the NLRB to enforce workers’ rights so as 
			not to be held accountable for their violations" of labor law.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			 |