Hemp growers push back against proposed new regulations
Send a link to a friend
[November 26, 2024]
By Peter Hancock
SPRINGFIELD – A legislative committee and the Illinois Department of
Agriculture agreed recently to delay finalizing new regulations
governing hemp production amid an outcry of protests from small,
independent producers.
Those proposed rules have been in development for at least two years.
But the most recent draft, submitted in September, contained significant
changes from earlier versions that caught many in the industry by
surprise. That included provisions allowing unannounced inspections and
testing of hemp crops, restrictions on who could obtain a license to
produce the crop, and the possibility of criminal sanctions for
violations of certain rules.
Norma Fuentes, a lobbyist for the Illinois Hemp Business Association,
which represents small, independent and minority-owned hemp businesses,
said the rules threatened to put many of them out of business.
“It kind of fueled a second War on Drugs, disenfranchised social equity
licenses and also financially burdened local businesses through some of
the testing that they require,” she said of the latest proposed rules.
Industrial hemp was once a significant crop in the United States in the
19th century when it was used for making common products like rope and
textiles. But it came under strict government control in the 20th
century because of its close biological relationship to marijuana, first
with passage of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, and later with a complete
ban with passage of the 1970 Controlled Substances Act.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfdf8/dfdf8103b7424d1c2088a13d03c1086103a3693b" alt=""
Nearly half a century later, with the rise in popularity of certain
hemp-derived products like CBD oil that are thought to provide health
benefits, federal control over hemp finally began to loosen.
First, the 2014 federal Farm Bill allowed colleges, universities and
state departments of agriculture to engage in pilot programs producing
hemp for research purposes. Then in 2018, both the state and federal
governments passed laws legalizing large-scale commercial hemp
production, subject to regulation.
The 2018 federal Farm Bill reclassified hemp – defined as cannabis with
less than 0.3% of the intoxicating chemical THC – by removing it from
the list of controlled substances and making it eligible for traditional
farm programs like crop insurance and farm loans.
And the Illinois General Assembly that year passed the Industrial Hemp
Act, giving the state Department of Agriculture authority to regulate
the industry, including the licensing of growers and processors, in
accordance with federal laws and regulations.
Since then, the Illinois Department of Agriculture has worked to
promulgate rules consistent with both the state and federal hemp laws.
According to a timeline provided by IDOA, the agency implemented its
first set of rules in 2019, shortly after passage of the Industrial Hemp
Act, and those have been used as the basis for regulating the industry
in Illinois so far.
Later that year, however, USDA published “interim” federal rules that
spelled out details for how states were to carry out the law and
requiring states to submit their own individual “hemp plans” to the
federal agency for approval.
Since Illinois already had rules in place, IDOA merely drafted
amendments to those rules and submitted those to USDA as the state’s
plan. USDA approved that plan in October 2020.
Then in January 2021, USDA published “final” rules for hemp production
that contained significant changes from the interim rules of 2019, which
required the state to make major changes to its rules.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b56d/2b56d108b5961b96fa636e90e9af6e52794cc414" alt=""
David Lakeman, left, manager of the Department of Agriculture’s
Division of Cannabis Regulation, and Sam McGee, the agency’s
cannabis regulation attorney, answer questions about proposed new
regulations governing hemp production at a Nov. 12 meeting of the
legislative Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. (Capitol News
Illinois photo by Peter Hancock)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fad81/fad81af5681c552f8b71dfffb6b759a7a28a44d3" alt=""
In December 2021, IDOA submitted a revised hemp plan to USDA for
approval and, after that plan was approved at the federal level in April
2022, the agency began the process of submitting that plan through the
state rulemaking process.
That process has now taken more than two years, during which time the
proposed rules have undergone even more changes. But David Lakeman,
IDOA’S division manager for cannabis and hemp, told the legislative
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules at a Nov. 12 meeting that the
agency’s intent has never changed.
“To be clear, the department’s intent here is solely to align and
implement the United States Department of Agriculture’s rules on hemp as
implementing the 2018 Farm Bill,” he said.
Speaking in a separate interview, however, Fuentes said the latest draft
of the proposed rules contains significant changes from earlier drafts
that have alarmed many in the hemp industry.
For example, she pointed to one provision that would prohibit
individuals from obtaining a hemp license, or even holding a management
position within a licensed hemp company, if they have been convicted of
a drug-related felony within the previous 10 years.
She noted that under the state’s Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act – the
2019 law that legalized recreational marijuana – Illinois gives
preference to license applicants who were previously harmed by the war
on drugs.
Lakeman, however, told JCAR the proposed licensing restriction is needed
to comply with federal law.
“The federal government and USDA has been extremely rigid on that
section, for us and for every other state that is running its own hemp
program,” he said.
Fuentes also pointed to new provisions authorizing IDOA to conduct
random, unannounced inspections and testing of hemp facilities, whereas
earlier versions of the rule required the agency to give at least five
days’ notice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b666f/b666fade4bda3904b90cfd634cc4b17f49a60aae" alt=""
“It opens the gate for overpolicing and criminalization of some of this
industry, which is what we believe starts and fuels a second War on
Drugs,” she said.
The proposed rules also contain a provision allowing administrative
penalties or, in some cases, criminal referrals to law enforcement
agencies for violations of the rules.
Although the proposed rules were scheduled for final approval Nov. 12,
IDOA agreed to delay final action for 45 days to allow time for the
agency to hold additional meetings and answer questions from industry
representatives and other stakeholders.
The rules will come up for consideration at JCAR’s next scheduled
meeting on Tuesday, Dec. 10, in Chicago.
Capitol News Illinois is
a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government
coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily
by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick
Foundation. |