‘You shouldn’t be talking like that’: Madigan scolded
alderman-turned-FBI mole for bringing up ‘quid pro quo’
Send a link to a friend
[November 27, 2024]
By Hannah Meisel
CHICAGO – Then-Chicago Ald. Danny Solis had already been cooperating
with the FBI for a little more than a year in June 2017 when he received
an unexpected voicemail from powerful Illinois House Speaker Michael
Madigan.
“Danny, it’s Mike Madigan,” began the brief message, which included none
of what the speaker wanted from Solis, who was at the time a 21-year
veteran of Chicago City Council and the chair of the council’s
influential Zoning Committee.
In a federal courtroom on Monday, Solis testified that his call back to
the speaker two minutes later opened a whole new avenue of focus for the
feds’ still-unfolding corruption investigation, and added Madigan to the
list of people he would surreptitiously record and lure into the FBI’s
trap.
After a brief wait on hold with the speaker’s law office, during which
the phone system played the orchestral “In the Hall of the Mountain
King,” a movie soundtrack favorite for characters devolving into
madness, Madigan picked up.
After pleasantries – including the speaker dryly joking that he “never
had it so good” even as his protracted battle with Republican Gov. Bruce
Rauner meant the state was nearing two years without a budget – Madigan
said he’d just read about a proposed real estate development in
Chicago’s booming West Loop neighborhood.
“Do you think that’s gonna go forward?” the speaker asked in the June
12, 2017 call.
Solis explained that he was waiting to put things on the agenda of his
zoning committee until the conclusion of a study that would give
guidelines for further development in the West Loop. The neighborhood
had in recent years seen unprecedented levels of residential
construction and a vibrant food scene after more than a century as
merely an industrial corridor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6386/b6386f02df486f23cc7a9d27dfef17cd31bfd299" alt=""
“Do you know the developer?” Solis asked Madigan.
“No, but I’d like to,” the speaker replied.
The alderman said he’d “see what I can do to get you an introduction.”
On the witness stand, Solis said he knew Madigan was trying to solicit
business for his law firm, which specialized in real estate, including
property tax appeals.
Nearly two weeks later, Solis called Madigan back at the FBI’s
direction, telling him that once he met with a representative from the
Union West development project the following week, he’d set up a meeting
between them and Madigan.
“I think they understand – they’ve got some issues that they still have
to deal with me in terms of zoning,” Solis said before explaining the
timing of the meetings. “I think they understand how this works, you
know, the quid pro quo.”
“Yeah, okay,” Madigan said.
On Monday, nearly 7 ½ years after that conversation, Assistant U.S.
Attorney Diane MacArthur asked Solis why he’d used the phrase “quid pro
quo” in the call.
“I don’t know,” Solis said after a pause. “It was dumb.”
“Say that again, please?” MacArthur asked, one of many times she asked
Solis to keep his voice up during his hours on the stand Monday.
“I thought it was too blunt but basically what I was trying to say was
we could have this meeting and he could probably get business from them,
and I could work on the zoning,”
Solis testified that his FBI contacts hadn’t instructed him to use the
phrase. But according to testimony from Special Agent Ryan McDonald last
week, Solis was carrying out directions to give Madigan the impression
that the alderman’s approval of necessary zoning changes was contingent
on the developers hiring the speaker’s law firm.
But it wasn’t true. In a secret video recording Solis made of a meeting
between himself and Union West developer Andrew Cretal a week later,
Solis pushed the idea of Madigan’s law firm handling property tax
appeals for the project, but didn’t tie any zoning approval to that
hiring. In fact, Solis referenced having already committed to approving
the zoning changes and was only held up by waiting for the results of
the West Loop development study.
A few weeks later, Solis brought Cretal and his colleague to Madigan’s
downtown Chicago law office to meet with the speaker and his law
partner, Vincent “Bud” Getzendanner. In the meeting, which lasted a
little over half an hour, Madigan was mostly silent, letting
Getzendanner explain how the firm usually handled property tax appeals
for large developments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a8b1/6a8b1f975bb559f699886865e658e4d5324a8a1b" alt=""
But prosecutors were most interested in what happened before the
meeting, when Madigan pulled Solis into his office and closed the door,
admonishing the alderman in a near-whisper.
“Over the phone, you made a comment that there, that there was a quid
pro quo,” a visibly younger Madigan said in the video – the only time in
the entire recording the speaker’s face could be seen for more than a
brief flash via the shaky body camera.
“Oh, I’m sorry. Yeah,” Solis said.
“You shouldn’t be talking like that,” Madigan said. “You’re just
recommending our law firm because if they don’t get a good result on the
real estate taxes, the whole project would be in trouble. Which is not
good for your ward. So you want high quality representation.”
Since prosecutors first highlighted this exchange in pre-trial motions
more than two years ago, the feds have characterized it as Madigan
providing a false story for Solis. The former speaker’s lawyers played
the clip in their opening arguments, with attorney Tom Breen remarking
that “I guess the government thinks Madigan should’ve punched him
(Solis) out or something.”
“No, Mike doesn’t talk that way, he doesn’t act that way,” Breen said
last month, previewing what’s likely to be an intense cross-examination
of Solis.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f02b/8f02b8b1e30ad4ce7ae5d29334cea5afb7de11b4" alt=""
The parking lot along Wentworth Ave. In Chicago’s Chinatown
neighborhood in October 2024. In 2017, then-Illinois House Speaker
Michael Madigan directed his close ally Mike McClain to work on
getting the state-owned land transferred to developers who were
interested in building on a portion of the lot. (Capitol News
Illinois photo by Andrew Adams)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6052/f605284de502bb4016c86e33daef130beb884f5c" alt=""
But MacArthur on Monday noted that Madigan still went forward with
scheduling the meeting even after Solis made his “quid pro quo” remark,
and that it was the speaker who had contacted Solis in the first place
to make an introduction.
“Did you have concerns at that point that a bad result on real estate
taxes would not be good for your ward?” MacArthur asked regarding the
Union West project.
“No,” Solis said.
The alderman also asked Madigan if they could talk privately again after
the larger meeting about a separate proposed development project in
Chicago’s Chinatown neighborhood, which was also in Solis’ 25th Ward.
In their post-meeting chat, Solis explained that real estate investors
were lined up and gathering community support to build a mixed-use
development on a portion of a longstanding surface parking lot in the
heart of Chinatown. But the land was actually owned by the state of
Illinois and leased to a not-for-profit that ran the parking lot.
Solis explained that in order for the project to move forward, the state
would need to transfer the land to the city of Chicago, which could in
turn sell it to the developers.
A couple months later, Solis called Madigan on both matters. The
alderman asked if the speaker’s law firm had ultimately contracted with
the Union West developers, and Madigan responded that he was “almost
positive the answer is yes” but said he’d check with Getzendanner.
When Solis asked about the contract again when the two connected nearly
a week later in September 2017, Madigan didn’t directly answer.
“You were contemplating processing something,” Madigan said. “You should
go ahead and process that.”
As the wiretapped calls played in the courtroom Monday, Madigan faced
away from Solis toward his defense table, temple of his reading glasses
between his lips as he listened intently.
MacArthur made much of the speaker’s cryptic language, asking what Solis
understood Madigan meant by “process that.”
“The support and passage of the Union West zoning change,” Solis said.
MacArhur also led Solis through a series of questions Monday about the
personally embarrassing circumstances that led to the FBI’s interest in
the alderman in 2014.
Solis’ money problems began during the Great Recession; he and his wife
were upside down on the mortgage on their home near the University of
Illinois at Chicago’s Circle Campus. In 2009, Solis began an affair with
a translator he met on a trip to China with other city officials to see
the aftermath of the 2008 Beijing Olympics as Chicago was pursuing a
2016 summer Olympic bid.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20a12/20a12bd44607bc9d917f733504fd826f6dd51b5c" alt=""
That translator introduced him to a Chinese-based developer who had
interest in building in Chicago, Solis testified. In one memorable
episode, the developer left a briefcase full of cash — equivalent to
$10,000 USD — on a bed in a hotel room. Solis said the woman he was with
took the cash back to Chicago, where she spent most of it on furniture
to outfit an apartment Solis would eventually live in once his wife
kicked him out.
“I think he (Li) was giving it to me to influence me in the work he was
trying to do in the States,” Solis testified.
Some of that work included a visa program Solis was involved with in
partnership with his sister Patti Solis Doyle and Brian Hynes, a
politically connected businessman whom Solis counted as a close friend.
The EB-5 visa program granted residency to foreign nationals who
invested in economic development projects that led to American jobs,
Solis testified.
But Solis’ financial situation continued to deteriorate during his
separation from his wife, as the bank foreclosed on his home. To make
ends meet, Solis used a credit card belonging to his 25th Ward Regular
Democratic Organization, of which he was the chairman and 25th Ward
committeeman, and a series of private loans.
Solis also testified that Hynes and another friend, Juan Gaytan,
provided him with Viagra. Asked why Solis didn’t just pursue a
prescription, he said it was “more convenient and quicker than
contacting my doctor.” But he also acknowledged the Viagra was meant to
influence him; Gaytan’s security firm held contracts with the city and
was looking for Solis to connect him with other governments for
additional contracts.
Hynes also arranged for massages for Solis — the kind that end with a
sexual act, the former alderman testified. That too, was meant to
influence him, as was a 2015 trip to Las Vegas Gaytan paid for, in
addition to the lavish party developer Fred Latsko paid for on an
Indiana farm for Solis’ son’s graduation. Solis said he only paid for
the tips to the servers hired for the party.
Hynes and Gaytan also provided Solis with tickets to Chicago sporting
events, though Solis said he often gave those away to constituents or
family. When MacArthur asked why none of those gifts ever showed up on
Solis’ campaign disclosure or statements of financial interest, Solis
said it was “a mistake.”
“I thought they were friends and I was wrong,” Solis said. “I made a
mistake.”
Capitol News Illinois is
a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government
coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily
by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f872e/f872e405f57e943336c648f37a2baa671d4ebdb3" alt="" |