Appeals court reinstates Indiana lawsuit against TikTok alleging child
safety, privacy concerns
Send a link to a friend
[October 02, 2024]
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — The Indiana Court of Appeals has
reinstated a lawsuit filed by the state accusing TikTok of deceiving its
users about the video-sharing platform's level of inappropriate content
for children and the security of its consumers’ personal information.
In a 3-0 ruling issued Monday, a three-judge panel of the state appeals
court reversed two November 2023 decisions by an Allen County judge
which dismissed a pair of lawsuits the state had filed in December 2022
against TikTok.
Those suits, which have been consolidated, allege the app contains
“salacious and inappropriate content” despite the company claiming it is
safe for children 13 years and under. The litigation also argues that
the app deceives consumers into believing their sensitive and personal
information is secure.
In November's ruling, Allen Superior Court Judge Jennifer L. DeGroote
found that her court lacked personal jurisdiction over the case and
reaffirmed a previous court ruling which found that downloading a free
app does not count as a consumer transaction under the Indiana Deceptive
Consumer Sales Act.
But in Monday's ruling, Judge Paul Mathias wrote on behalf of the
appeals court that TikTok’s millions of Indiana users and the $46
million in Indiana-based income the company reported in 2021 create
sufficient contact between the company and the state to establish the
jurisdiction of Indiana’s courts over TikTok, The Times of Northwest
Indiana reported.
Mathias also wrote that TikTok’s business model of providing access to
its video content library in exchange for the personal data of its
Indiana users counts as a “consumer transaction” under the law, even if
no payment is involved.
[to top of second column]
|
“The plain and ordinary definition of the word ‘sale,’ which is not
otherwise defined in the DCSA, includes any consideration to effectuate
the transfer of property, not only an exchange for money,” Mathias
wrote.
“It is undisputed that TikTok exchanges access to its app’s content
library for end-user personal data. That is the bargain between TikTok
and its end-users. And, under the plain and ordinary use of the word,
that is a ‘sale’ of access to TikTok’s content library for the
end-user’s personal data. TikTok’s business model is therefore a
consumer transaction under the DCSA.”
A spokesperson for the Indiana Attorney General's office said Tuesday in
a statement that the appeals court “took a common sense approach and
agreed with our office’s argument that there’s simply no serious
question that Indiana has established specific personal jurisdiction
over TikTok.”
“By earning more $46 million dollars from Hoosier consumers in 2021,
TikTok is doing business in the state and is therefore subject to this
lawsuit,” the statement adds.
The Associated Press left a message Tuesday afternoon for a lead
attorney for TikTok seeking comment on the appeals court's ruling.
TikTok is owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company that moved its
headquarters to Singapore in 2020. The app has been a target over the
past year of state and federal lawmakers who say the Chinese government
could access the app’s users’ data.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita has repeatedly personally urged
Hoosiers to ”patriotically delete″ the TikTok app due to its supposed
ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |