US nuclear weapon production sites violated environmental rules, federal
judge decides
Send a link to a friend
[October 04, 2024]
By MORGAN LEE
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — The National Nuclear Security Administration
failed to properly evaluate its expansion of plutonium pit production at
sites in South Carolina and New Mexico in violation of environmental
regulations, a federal judge has ruled.
Plaintiffs challenged a plan consummated in 2018 for two pit production
sites — at South Carolina's Savannah River and New Mexico's Los Alamos
National Laboratory — that they say relied on an outdated environmental
impact study. They also say it didn't truly analyze simultaneous
production, and undermined safety and accountability safeguards for a
multibillion-dollar nuclear weapons program and related waste disposal.
“Defendants neglected to properly consider the combined effects of their
two-site strategy and have failed to convince the court they gave
thought to how those effects would affect the environment,” Judge Mary
Geiger Lewis said in her ruling.
The decision arrives as U.S. authorities this week certified with a
“diamond stamp” the first new plutonium pit from Los Alamos for
deployment as a key component to nuclear warheads under efforts to
modernize the nation’s weapons.
Hollow, globe-shaped plutonium pits are placed at the core of nuclear
warheads. Plutonium is one of the two key ingredients used to
manufacture nuclear weapons, along with highly enriched uranium.
The new ruling from South Carolina's federal court says nuclear weapons
regulators violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to
properly analyze alternatives to production of the nuclear warhead
component at Savannah River and Los Alamos.
“These agencies think they can proceed with their most expensive and
complex project ever without required public analyses and credible cost
estimates," said Jay Coghlan, director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico,
which is a co-plaintiff to the lawsuit, in a statement Thursday that
praised the ruling.
The court order gives litigants two weeks to “reach some sort of
proposed compromise” in writing.
[to top of second column]
|
This undated file photo shows the Los Alamos National Laboratory in
Los Alamos, N.M. (The Albuquerque Journal via AP, File)
A spokesperson for the the National Nuclear Security Administration
said the agency is reviewing the court’s ruling and consulting with
the Department of Justice.
“We will confer with the plaintiffs, as ordered,” spokesperson Milli
Mike said in an email. “At this point in the judicial process, work
on the program continues.”
The ruling rejected several additional claims, including concerns
about the analysis of the disposal of radioactive materials from the
pit-making process.
At the same time, the judge said nuclear weapons regulators at the
Department of Energy “failed to conduct a proper study on the
combined effects of their two-site strategy” and “they have
neglected to present a good reason.”
Plutonium pits were manufactured previously at Los Alamos until
2012, while the lab was dogged by a string of safety lapses and
concerns about a lack of accountability.
Proposals to move production to South Carolina touched off a
political battle in Washington, D.C., as New Mexico senators fought
to retain a foothold for Los Alamos in the multibillion-dollar
program. The Energy Department is now working to ramp up production
at both Savannah River and Los Alamos to an eventual 80 pits per
year, amid timeline extensions and rising cost estimates.
Plaintiffs to the plutonium pit lawsuit include environmental and
nuclear-safety advocacy groups as well as a coalition of Gullah-Geechee
communities of Black slave descendants along the coasts of Georgia
and South Carolina.
Outside Denver, the long-shuttered Rocky Flats Plant was capable of
producing more than 1,000 war reserve pits annually before work
stopped in 1989 due to environmental and regulatory concerns. In
1996, the Department of Energy provided for limited production
capacity at Los Alamos, which produced its first war reserve pit in
2007. The lab stopped operations in 2012 after producing what was
needed at the time.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |