Federal prosecutors face challenges in Madigan's corruption trial
Send a link to a friend
[October 08, 2024]
By Brett Rowland | The Center Square
(The Center Square) – After investigating Illinois' former House Speaker
Michael Madigan for more than a decade, prosecutors need to convince a
jury that he is guilty of a multi-year racketeering and bribery scheme.
Federal prosecutors face at least two new challenges that didn't factor
into a string of recent corruption convictions related to the case
against Madigan.
Prosecutors have tied together a couple of corruption convictions in
northern Illinois in recent years with ties to Madigan. A jury in 2023
convicted four former ComEd lobbyists and leaders of paying out $1.3
million in jobs and contracts to associates of Madigan over nine years
to influence the former House speaker. Another jury that same year
convicted Madigan's longtime chief of staff of perjury and obstruction
of justice for lying to a grand jury investigating Madigan and others.
In a third Madigan-related case, a judge declared a mistrial last month
after a jury deadlocked 11-1 on charges alleging former AT&T Illinois
leader Paul La Schiazza bribed Madigan.
In the case set against Madigan and co-defendant Michael McClain set to
start Tuesday, prosecutors must contend with a key witness who lied
under oath and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what
constitutes bribery. The witness, Fidel Marquez, was caught lying on a
federal form to buy a gun, a blow for prosecutors and a surprise boon
for Madigan's defense team.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07860/078604afa573bd55c2e867b3b45754e92dabbd09" alt=""
Marquez, the former ComEd executive who cooperated with federal
investigators in the ComEd corruption probe, tried to buy a gun in March
in another state. When he filled out the federal form, he answered "no"
to the question that asked if he was "under indictment or information in
any court for a felony." Marquez also responded "no" to a question on
the form that asked if he had been convicted of a felony. Marquez
pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to commit bribery in
2020. That felony popped up during the gun purchase process.
Those lies could hurt the prosecution, the judge in the gun case warned.
"The thing that you have is your credibility – that's it," the judge
told Marquez during a hearing. "And you have now handed a gift to
Madigan's defense attorneys. It is a first-year law student's dream,
basically, to do a cross-examination like this."
Marquez served as a crucial witness for federal prosecutors during the
ComEd trial. He spent five days on the stand in that case, detailing
secret audio and video recordings he made of the defendants in that
case.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dee1/8dee1429892be1a04da24af854fb7a46a43d0c95" alt=""
Former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan leaves the Everett M.
Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in Chicago on Wednesday, Jan. 3, 2024.
By Brett Rowland | The Center Square
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b298c/b298ce91873696acf6ebe3c39c31b8cb77a4fe98" alt=""
The Supreme Court ruling in Snyder v. U.S. won't derail the charges
against Madigan, but could form the basis of a later appeal.
The judge overseeing Madigan's case, John Robert Blakey, has already
ruled – over objections from defense teams – that the Supreme Court
ruling in the Snyder case won't affect the charges prosecutors
brought against Madigan and McClain.
However, the high-court decision has the potential to draw an appeal
of any verdict.
Defense attorneys in the ComEd Four case asked for a new trial after
the Snyder ruling. The post-trial motions in that case related to
the ruling have delayed sentencing for more than a year.
Madigan served in the Illinois House from 1971 to 2021, as speaker
from 1983 to 1995 and again from 1997 to 2021. That made him one of
the state's most powerful politicians, especially given his role as
head of the Democratic party in the state. He faces 23 counts of
racketeering, bribery, and official misconduct. Madigan has pleaded
not guilty.
In March 2022, Madigan and McClain were charged with 22 counts of
racketeering and bribery for alleged improper dealings with the
state's largest utility, ComEd.
Prosecutors further allege that Madigan used his political power to
unlawfully steer business to his private law firm, Madigan &
Getzendanner. In October 2022, prosecutors filed a superseding
indictment that charged Madigan and McClain with conspiracy related
to an alleged corruption scheme involving AT&T Illinois.
The state's highest-profile corruption trial in years is set to
begin with jury selection at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Oct. 8, in Courtroom
1203 at the Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse in
Chicago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7264d/7264d71c73255406552b2c8887998328bef05458" alt="" |