His country trained him to fight. Then he turned against it. More like 
		him are doing the same
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [October 17, 2024]  
		By JASON DEAREN, MICHELLE R. SMITH and AARON KESSLER 
		
		MOUNT OLIVE, N.C. (AP) — The U.S. military trained him in explosives and 
		battlefield tactics. Now the Iraq War veteran and enlisted National 
		Guard member was calling for taking up arms against police and 
		government officials in his own country. 
		 
		Standing in the North Carolina woods, Chris Arthur warned about a coming 
		civil war. Videos he posted publicly on YouTube bore titles such as “The 
		End of America or the Next Revolutionary War.” In his telling, the U.S. 
		was falling into chaos and there would be only one way to survive: kill 
		or be killed. 
		 
		Arthur was posting during a surge of far-right extremism in the years 
		leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. He wrote warcraft 
		training manuals to help others organize their own militias. And he 
		offered sessions at his farm in Mount Olive, North Carolina, that taught 
		how to kidnap and attack public officials, use snipers and explosives 
		and design a “fatal funnel” booby trap to inflict mass casualties. 
		 
		While he continued to post publicly, military and law enforcement 
		ignored more than a dozen warnings phoned in by Arthur’s wife’s 
		ex-husband about Arthur’s increasingly violent rhetoric and calls for 
		the murder of police officers. This failure by the Guard, FBI and others 
		to act allowed Arthur to continue to manufacture and store explosives 
		around young children and train another extremist who would attack 
		police officers in New York state and lead them on a wild, two-hour 
		chase and gun battle. 
		 
		Arthur isn’t an anomaly. He is among more than 480 people with a 
		military background accused of ideologically driven extremist crimes 
		from 2017 through 2023, including the more than 230 arrested in 
		connection with the Jan. 6 insurrection. 
		 
		At the same time, while the pace at which the overall population has 
		been radicalizing increased in recent years, people with military 
		backgrounds have been radicalizing at a faster rate. Their extremist 
		plots were also more likely to involve weapons training or firearms than 
		plots that didn’t include someone with a military background, according 
		to an Associated Press analysis of domestic terrorism data obtained 
		exclusively by the AP. This held true whether or not the plots were 
		executed. 
		 
		While the number of people involved remains small, the participation of 
		active military and veterans gave extremist plots more potential for 
		mass injury or death, according to data collected and analyzed by the 
		National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to 
		Terrorism, or START, at the University of Maryland. START researchers 
		found that more than 80% of extremists with military backgrounds 
		identified with far-right, anti-government or white supremacist 
		ideologies, with the rest split among far-left, jihadist or other 
		motivations. 
		 
		In the shadow of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — led in part by 
		veterans — and a closely contested presidential election, law 
		enforcement officials have said the threat from domestic violent 
		extremists is one of the most persistent and pressing terror threats to 
		the United States. However, despite the increasing participation in 
		extremist activity by those with military experience, there is still no 
		force-wide system to track it. And the AP learned that Defense 
		Department researchers developed a promising approach to detect and 
		monitor extremism that the Pentagon has chosen not to use. 
		
		
		  
		
		As part of its investigation, the AP vetted and added to the data and 
		analyses provided by START, and collected thousands of pages of records 
		and hours of audio and video recordings through public records requests. 
		 
		Free of scrutiny in Mount Olive, Arthur stockpiled weapons, some with 
		the serial numbers scratched off to make them untraceable. He trained a 
		pack of Doberman pinschers as guard dogs. He rigged his old farmhouse, 
		where he lived with his wife, their three kids and two children from her 
		previous marriage, with improvised explosives, including a bomb hidden 
		on the front porch and wired to a switch inside. 
		 
		As early as 2017, his wife’s former husband had reported concerns about 
		his children's safety to military, federal and local authorities, 
		according to call records and police reports. 
		 
		All the while, Arthur continued growing his business and connecting with 
		more like-minded individuals. 
		 
		In early 2020, a man with a raging hatred for police and an interest in 
		building a militia in Virginia came to the farm, eager to learn. 
		 
		A festering problem 
		 
		Service members and veterans who radicalize make up a tiny fraction of a 
		percentage point of the millions and millions who have honorably served 
		their country. 
		 
		However, when people with military backgrounds “radicalize, they tend to 
		radicalize to the point of mass violence,” said START’s Michael Jensen, 
		who leads the team that has spent years compiling and vetting the 
		dataset. 
		 
		His group found that among extremists “the No. 1 predictor of being 
		classified as a mass casualty offender was having a U.S. military 
		background – that outranked mental health problems, that outranked being 
		a loner, that outranked having a previous criminal history or substance 
		abuse issues.” 
		 
		The data tracked individuals with military backgrounds, most of whom 
		were veterans, involved in plans to kill, injure or inflict damage for 
		political, social, economic or religious goals. While some violent plots 
		in the data were unsuccessful, those that succeeded killed and hurt 
		dozens of people. Since 2017, nearly 100 people have been killed or 
		injured in these plots, nearly all in service of an anti-government, 
		white supremacist or far-right agenda. 
		 
		A month after people in tactical gear stormed up the U.S. Capitol steps 
		in military-style stack formation on Jan. 6, the new defense secretary, 
		Lloyd Austin, addressed the long-festering problem. He ordered a 
		force-wide “stand down” to give time to local military commanders to 
		discuss the issue with personnel. He empaneled the Countering Extremist 
		Activity Working Group to study and recommend solutions. Among the 
		group’s eventual recommendations was to clarify what was prohibited 
		under the military’s ban on extremist activity. The revised policy, 
		released in December 2021, now specifies that anti-government or 
		anti-democratic actions are violations of the Uniform Code of Military 
		Justice, federal laws that apply to all service members. 
		 
		Some applauded the changes, but military and political leaders had been 
		concerned about extremism in the ranks for years after a wakeup call in 
		1995 when Army veteran and white supremacist Timothy McVeigh killed 168 
		people in the Oklahoma City bombing. And the Pentagon, Department of 
		Homeland Security and a research arm of the U.S. Justice Department have 
		all funded START’s research. 
		 
		Bishop Garrison, a U.S. Army veteran and former senior advisor to 
		Austin, led the working group to address extremism following Jan. 6 and 
		the widespread unrest in 2020 amid the COVID pandemic and a racial 
		reckoning. 
		 
		“We believe the vast majority of people who serve do so honorably, and 
		this is a small group of individuals having an outsized impact,” 
		Garrison told the AP. “But we also still need to analyze data to ensure 
		that our hypothesis is correct and supported by fact.” 
		 
		Yet a chief hurdle cited by Pentagon officials has been a lack of data – 
		how to understand the scope of extremism in the ranks when there are 
		millions of active-duty service members across all of the branches? 
		
		
		  
		
		“What’s vexing about this is we don’t have a great sense of the scope of 
		the problem,” then-Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told CNN in the weeks 
		after Jan. 6. “Many of these people … work very hard to conceal their 
		beliefs. We can’t be the thought police.” 
		 
		The Pentagon did develop at least one way to detect extremist incidents 
		across military branches and among civilian defense contractors. But it 
		isn’t using it. 
		 
		The method was revealed in a research memo published the summer after 
		Jan. 6 that, until now, has not been released publicly. American 
		Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group, obtained the memo through a 
		Freedom of Information Act lawsuit it brought against the Pentagon and 
		shared it with the AP. 
		 
		In a project that began in September 2020 and lasted into 2021, DoD 
		researchers studying “insider threats” and other security issues in the 
		workforce developed a way to mine data from a DoD security clearance 
		database to identify white supremacist and extremist incidents. This 
		database included details from security incident reports filed about 
		people who held security clearances — a wide swath of the military 
		population, civilians and contractors included. 
		 
		The operation identified hundreds of reported incidents of white 
		supremacy and anti-government and other extremist activity over 20 years 
		— the kinds of internal red flags that could identify issues with 
		service members. 
		 
		The researchers, whose names were redacted, wrote that the results were 
		a first step toward developing a way to identify incidents of extremism, 
		and that the method could be used in other DoD databases. 
		 
		And while the research was shared among some departments in the DoD 
		after Jan. 6, it never made it to Garrison, who was leading the 
		Pentagon’s extremism working group, he told the AP. He called the 
		oversight “problematic” given his, and the working group’s, mission. 
		 
		“I am very surprised by the existence of the report.” 
		 
		A defense official did not address why the report was not sent directly 
		to the working group. In a statement, the official said the DoD is 
		“committed to understanding the root causes of extremism and ensuring 
		such behavior is promptly and appropriately addressed and reported to 
		the proper authorities,” and that the department has enhanced its 
		ability to track extremism allegations. 
		 
		‘Very violent and very ugly’ 
		 
		Arthur’s young children sat atop a blue plastic tub on his farmhouse’s 
		porch in Mount Olive, their feet dangling as their older sister tied 
		their shoes. In the tub was an improvised bomb that Arthur had wired to 
		a switch inside the house, according to evidence presented at Arthur’s 
		trial. 
		 
		“They would swing their feet as kids do and pop holes in it. I wasn’t 
		very careful around (the explosives),” the older sister, the daughter of 
		Arthur’s wife and her ex-husband, told the AP. The AP is not naming the 
		children interviewed for this story because they are minors. 
		 
		As an Army cavalry scout who served two tours in Iraq, Arthur learned 
		more specialized skills than an average soldier, such as how to rig 
		improvised explosives. He left the National Guard in 2019 to focus 
		full-time on Tackleberry Solutions, his military tactics business where 
		he sold access to this deadly expertise. Tackleberry was Arthur’s 
		nickname in the Army, after the gun-loving veteran in the “Police 
		Academy” films known for using inappropriately aggressive military 
		tactics in civilian contexts. 
		 
		After leaving the Guard, he also turned his attention to local politics. 
		Arthur, a former deputy sheriff himself, backed a “constitutional 
		sheriff” candidate who believed sheriffs, not federal or state law 
		enforcement, held ultimate authority in the U.S. He tried to enlist 
		county officials, according to court documents, to aid in creating a 
		militia to guard against the “tyrannical government.” 
		
		  
		
		“You’re gonna have to secure your smallest municipality and governing 
		body first, that means townships or cities will have to be conquered 
		immediately through force,” Arthur said in a video posted just after he 
		left the Guard. 
		 
		“Whatever you do, it has to be very violent and very ugly.” 
		 
		Arthur’s videos had become increasingly unhinged, said Ben Powell, who 
		was hearing from his children that there were explosives hidden 
		throughout the farm. Powell’s son said he often used a hand-cranked 
		wringer in the “bomb shed” to dry his clothes. The wringer sat near a 
		barrel of the explosive Tannerite and Arthur’s storage area for his 
		homemade grenades and pipe bombs. 
		 
		“The older I get, the more screwed up I see the stuff is,” the son, now 
		in his teens, said. 
		 
		Powell drove a truck as a civilian DoD contractor at the Tooele Army 
		Depot in Utah. He said he felt a professional responsibility to report 
		Arthur after watching the videos, and hearing stories from his kids 
		about the goings on at the farm. 
		 
		“That’s kind of what I’m supposed to do, is report if there’s issues, 
		especially if it’s an inside threat, like a guy in the military,” he 
		said. 
		 
		He called an Army “I Salute” hotline set up to receive “suspicious 
		activity” reports, and an intelligence hotline. 
		 
		“I called and said, ‘You guys need to do something before somebody gets 
		hurt. He’s talking about killing cops. He’s talking about killing the 
		FBI.’” 
		 
		He’d called the North Carolina National Guard previously with his 
		concerns, and not seen any action. So Powell told his supervisor at the 
		Utah Army depot about Arthur, and showed some of the videos. Still, 
		there was no response. The North Carolina National Guard and the U.S. 
		Army said they did not have any records of discipline involving Arthur. 
		Heather J. Hagan, an Army spokeswoman, would not comment on the 
		particulars of Arthur’s case but said “we do forward all information to 
		our law enforcement partners when appropriate.” 
		 
		Things continued to escalate quickly. Arthur and his wife pulled the 
		kids from the public school and began home-schooling them, with no input 
		from Powell. 
		
		In March 2020 Powell spoke with the Duplin County Sheriff’s Department, 
		where Arthur had worked briefly as a deputy in the 2000s before he 
		joined the Army. Powell had not spoken with his children since 
		Christmas, and was worried. 
		  
		 He asked for officers to make contact with the children to check their 
		welfare. The sheriff did not respond to a request for comment, but 
		provided records showing that a deputy reported seeing the children at 
		the farm in March 2020. The deputy determined the children “appear to be 
		well taken care of” and took no further action. 
		
		
		  
		
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            The Livingston County Sheriff’s Office works at the scene of a 
			tractor trailer after driver Joshua Blessed was killed during a 
			shootout with law enforcement officers on Rt. 20A in Geneseo, N.Y., 
			on Thursday, May 28, 2020. The incident started in LeRoy, N.Y., when 
			police stopped the tractor trailer for speeding. Blessed took off 
			and drove into Livingston County, leading law enforcement on a 
			chase. (Tina MacIntyre-Yee/Democrat & Chronicle via AP, File) 
            
			  
            That same month, a man came for an extended stay at Arthur’s farm. 
			 
			Joshua Blessed slept on a cot in the kitchen and refused to talk to 
			Arthur’s wife or children. During the day, he would disappear with 
			Arthur for long training sessions in wartime tactics. 
			 
			The fatal funnel 
			 
			Weeks later, Blessed raced his tractor trailer down a rural highway 
			between Buffalo and Rochester in upstate New York, firing a pistol 
			out his window at the parade of police cars behind him. 
			 
			The sleepy evening in LeRoy, New York, in May 2020 had been 
			disrupted when an officer pulled Blessed over for speeding. After a 
			brief verbal exchange, Blessed drove away with the officer still 
			standing on the truck’s running boards, forcing him to jump off the 
			moving rig. 
			 
			Blessed, a 58-year-old truck driver and former security guard from 
			Virginia, had spent years posting conspiracy-laden videos that 
			vilified law enforcement. 
			 
			Now he was leading more than 40 officers on a high-speed chase and 
			gun battle, ramming multiple squad cars that tried to slow him down. 
			 
			The FBI’s office in Richmond, Virginia, had looked before at 
			Blessed, who also went by Sergei Jourev. In April 2018, they’d 
			learned that he was attempting to organize a militia extremist group 
			in preparation for “The Army of God, for the upcoming Civil War.” 
			 
			Blessed eventually found Arthur and traveled to his farm to learn 
			about improvised explosives and other deadly warfare tactics. The 
			two had continued texting in the weeks before Blessed’s trip to New 
			York about the technical details of gunpowder, igniters and how to 
			make Claymore mines, which spray shrapnel. 
			 
			“Unfortunately, he knew what he was doing,” said Livingston County 
			Undersheriff Matthew Bean, who was among those involved in the 
			response. 
			 
			Midway through the chase, Blessed stopped his rig, blocking a narrow 
			highway onramp and trapping pursuing vehicles behind him. He’d also 
			turned the truck’s cab at a slight angle to see the patrol cars 
			behind him. 
			 
			Then he opened fire, his bullets pelting the pursuing cruisers. 
			 
			It was a “fatal funnel,” the tactic Arthur taught that was meant to 
			make single combatants facing a much larger force more deadly. 
			 
			However, during the gunfire an officer managed to make their way 
			around to the truck’s passenger side, surprising Blessed, who drove 
			off. Police vehicles forced him from the interstate onto a road that 
			crossed through farms. Officers waiting there fired their weapons as 
			Blessed’s truck roared by. 
			 
			Finally, the truck crashed into a ditch off the road. The 
			bullet-scarred cab pulsed with police lights as rattled officers 
			approached cautiously on foot. Inside, Blessed was slumped over 
			dead, shot in the head. 
			 
			It was “divine intervention” that no officers were hit by the truck 
			or Blessed’s bullets, Bean said. Ammo struck at least five law 
			enforcement vehicles, according to police reports; a forensics 
			report found a bullet lodged in an officer’s backpack on the 
			passenger seat next to him. 
			 
			“All 40 men and women who responded had some kind of post-traumatic 
			stress disorder from that incident,” said Bean. Two left law 
			enforcement because of it, he said. 
			 
			Investigators figured that Blessed had been planning a much larger 
			attack. 
			 
			A few months later, on Jan. 6, Arthur’s apocalyptic visions of the 
			future began to play out when many like-minded men and women stormed 
			the U.S. Capitol. Arthur wasn’t in Washington, D.C., he said, but 
			the aftermath found him almost immediately. 
			 
			Federal agents were knocking on the doors of his fellow militia 
			members in North Carolina, he said, and his own actions would come 
			under tighter scrutiny. 
			 
			In Blessed’s truck, investigators had found two how-to explosives 
			and military tactics manuals for which he had paid $850 from 
			Arthur’s Tackleberry Solutions. They would find $125,000 in cash, 14 
			live pipe bombs, an AK-47 with a scope, a .50-caliber rifle, a 
			sniper rifle and tens of thousands of dollars in ammunition. 
			 
			Years had passed since Powell reported Arthur to multiple military, 
			local and federal law enforcement agencies. Powell said he called 
			the U.S. Army, FBI, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 
			and others so many times that he lost count. 
			 
			“And there was nothing,” Powell said. “There was no response.” 
            
			  
			When asked about Powell’s reports, an FBI spokesperson in Charlotte 
			said the agency would not provide information beyond what was 
			published in court records. An ATF spokesperson in North Carolina 
			said there was no record of them opening a case. 
			 
			Indeed, federal law enforcement agencies have a questionable recent 
			history assessing domestic terrorism threats accurately. The FBI 
			assessment of domestic violent extremists written before the Jan. 6 
			attacks reported, incorrectly, the participants’ “low willingness to 
			take action in response to a disputed election result” and “those 
			who are interested lack the capability to carry out anything beyond 
			a simple attack.” 
			 
			And before the white supremacist “Unite the Right” violence in 
			Charlottesville in 2017 that killed a woman and left others severely 
			injured, the Department of Homeland Security had focused much of its 
			threat assessment on the dangers posed by far-left counterprotesters. 
			 
			After years of missed opportunities, the FBI was investigating 
			Arthur. “It takes over 100 rounds and Joshua Blessed is shot and 
			killed,” Powell said. “It takes cops getting shot at on public 
			roadways during a high-speed chase with a 40,000-pound truck. That’s 
			what it takes before anybody even looked into this.” 
			 
			‘Buckshot’ 
			 
			On May 5, 2021, Michael Thompson drove to a wartime tactics training 
			session in Mount Olive. He pulled his truck up to the small, 
			single-story farmhouse Arthur’s grandfather had built. 
			 
			It was a year after Blessed’s rampage in upstate New York and just a 
			few months after Jan.6. Thompson had contacted Arthur through the 
			Tackleberry webpage. 
			 
			They approached each other warily. 
			 
			With a chuckle, Arthur assured Thompson that he wasn’t a cop. 
			 
			“You never know man, these days,” Thompson said. 
			 
			“No you don’t.… And the thing is, that half the cops are good guys, 
			and half are the bad guys,” Arthur said. “But if I don’t know who’s 
			good and who’s bad, I’m just gonna walk in and clean house.” 
			 
			As the two men became acquainted, Arthur claimed to have built a 
			local militia with other highly trained veterans including a Navy 
			SEAL, an Army Ranger and a couple of Marine veterans in the area. 
			One of his military buddies he called “Priest” stayed at the farm 
			and trained too, according to both children who spoke to the AP. 
			 
			“Every night at about 10:30, (Arthur) would go out into the shed and 
			open up his radios and would just call out and touch bases with a 
			whole bunch of other people. To kind of bring together the militia 
			that come together and exchange information,” said Powell’s 
			daughter, who often sat with Arthur during these communications when 
			she couldn’t sleep. 
			 
			Thompson had contacted Arthur saying he needed to prepare for battle 
			against federal agents. ATF agents confiscated some of his guns 
			while he was out and his wife was home with their children alone, he 
			said. They were coming back. This time he wanted to be ready. 
			 
			Arthur and Thompson discussed using hidden, improvised explosive 
			devices, and how Thompson could transform his house into a “spider 
			web” of fatal booby traps meant to kill raiding federal agents. 
			 
			Thompson was wearing a wire for the FBI under the code name 
			“Buckshot.” 
			 
			“I want to show you something called a spider web,” Arthur said. 
			“This was something I built for a fellow recon buddy of mine.” 
			 
			“It is a freakin’ death box.” 
			 
			Thompson and Arthur talked for hours, eventually settling into seats 
			in the house with Arthur’s kids swirling around. Then talk turned to 
			assassination; using snipers and hidden explosives against 
			well-guarded politicians, according to the recordings. 
			 
			Arthur said such killings will be necessary in the coming civil war 
			— and that snipers are most effective, in many cases. 
			 
			“I know if I can put a round right there in the base of the 
			windshield where it meets the dashboard. I’ll hit him. So is the 
			sniper hit better? Yes. 
			 
			“Say it’s a whole walled-off gated house … The governor’s mansion. 
			Alright, how do I attack him? Well, he’s going to have to leave to 
			go to the Capitol at some point, right?” Arthur said, his wife and 
			children nearby talking about school and working in the garden. 
			 
			It is these targeted attacks that the data show people with military 
			backgrounds are making more successful. Those include the 2020 
			murders of a federal security officer and a sheriff’s deputy in 
			California by an active-duty Air Force staff sergeant and the 2018 
			attack by a former Army soldier who shot six women at a Florida hot 
			yoga studio, killing two, before he killed himself. 
            
			  
			When military members are involved, the plots are more likely to 
			seek and inflict mass casualties — and in an election year it is 
			this kind of attack that worries people who are studying how 
			military expertise is influencing extremist action. A mass casualty 
			attack is defined as one that kills or injures four or more people. 
			 
			“My primary concern is not a march on the Capitol or any other 
			government building. It’s that somebody with the skills that were 
			imparted on them by the military to be extremely lethal uses those 
			skills,” said START’s Jensen. 
			 
			“And they go out and attack civilians and have a real impact on 
			public safety.” 
			 
			Armed with Thompson’s recordings, FBI agents planned for a way to 
			arrest Arthur safely — a threat assessment of the farm had 
			determined it was too dangerous to try it there. 
			 
			The informant told Arthur to meet him at a gun show in Raleigh. He 
			said he had contacts there who would buy some Tackleberry manuals. 
			 
			Arthur met Thompson at the event entrance and the two passed through 
			metal detectors — Arthur wasn’t armed. A SWAT team waiting inside 
			surprised Arthur, who initially resisted attempts to restrain him, 
			agents said. Officers then forced Arthur to the ground, and arrested 
			him. 
			 
			At the same time, bomb disposal teams were searching Arthur’s home. 
			They found sandbags and cans filled with Tannerite — which, if hit 
			by gunfire from afar, can explode. The teams also discovered the 
			pipe bomb wired to a switch on the porch. 
			 
			‘You took the oath’ 
			 
			In May, U.S. District Judge James C. Dever III sentenced Arthur to 
			25 years in federal prison after a jury convicted him on charges 
			related to teaching the FBI’s informant how to make bombs meant to 
			kill federal law enforcement officers, as well as illegal weapons 
			possession. 
			 
			Prosecutors said they’d found improvised grenades and other “mass 
			casualty” and “indiscriminate” weapons on Arthur’s farm. 
			 
			A psychological workup found no evidence of mental illness, but did 
			cite likely war trauma as a factor in Arthur’s paranoia. Still, the 
			conclusion was that Arthur did not need “acute mental health 
			treatment.” 
            
			  
			Dever, also a veteran, told Arthur that his specialized military 
			training in explosives and other warfare techniques made his conduct 
			that much more serious. 
			 
			“You took the oath that all of us who served took,” Dever told 
			Arthur. “You know better.” 
			 
			But Arthur is unrepentant. 
			 
			In messages to AP from a federal prison in Tennessee, he said he is 
			a target of “political warfare.” 
			 
			“I’m a political prisoner,” he wrote, echoing the language former 
			President Donald Trump and others have used to minimize the crimes 
			committed in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. 
			 
			In Arthur’s view, the imprisonment of “vets and patriots” like 
			himself and the attempted assassination of Trump in Pennsylvania 
			prophesy the civil war he has long argued is coming. 
			 
			“This is happening,” he wrote. “All the signs are there.” 
			 
			___ 
			 
			Kessler reported from Washington, D.C. Contributing to this story 
			were Rhonda Shafner, Michael Rezendes and Marshall Ritzel in New 
			York, Serginho Roosblad in San Francisco, Allen G. Breed in Mount 
			Olive, N.C., Rick Bowmer in Salt Lake City, and Michael Kunzelman, 
			Lolita Baldor and Tara Copp in Washington, D.C. 
			___ 
			 
			The Associated Press receives support from several private 
			foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and 
			democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is 
			solely responsible for all content. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |