Russia flaunts its many doomsday weapons to keep the West from ramping
up support for Ukraine
Send a link to a friend
[October 18, 2024]
By The Associated Press
This year has seen President Vladimir Putin repeatedly brandish the
nuclear sword, reminding everyone that Russia has the world’s largest
atomic arsenal to try to deter the West from ramping up support for
Ukraine.
He ordered his military to hold drills involving battlefield nuclear
weapons with ally Belarus.
He announced Russia will start producing ground-based intermediate range
missiles that were outlawed by a now-defunct U.S.-Soviet treaty in 1987.
And last month, he lowered the threshold for unleashing his arsenal by
revising the country’s nuclear doctrine.
Putin is relying on those thousands of warheads and hundreds of missiles
as an enormous doomsday machine to offset NATO's massive edge in
conventional weapons to discourage what he sees as threats to Russia’s
sovereignty and territorial integrity.
A look at Russia's atomic arsenal and the issues surrounding it:
Russia's strategic weapons
The Federation of American Scientists estimated this year that Russia
has an inventory totaling 5,580 deployed and non-deployed nuclear
warheads, while the U.S. has 5,044. Together, that’s about 88% of the
world’s nuclear weapons.
Most of these are strategic, or intercontinental-range weapons. Like the
U.S., Russia has a nuclear triad of ground-based intercontinental
ballistic missiles, long-range bombers and ICBM-armed submarines.
Since Putin came to power in 2000, the Kremlin has worked to upgrade the
Soviet-built components of the triad, deploying hundreds of new
land-based missiles, commissioning new nuclear submarines and
modernizing nuclear-capable bombers. Russia's effort to revamp its
nuclear forces has helped prompt the U.S. to launch a costly
modernization of its arsenal.
Russia has reequipped its land-based strategic missile forces with
mobile Yars ICBMs and recently began deploying the heavy, silo-based
Sarmat ICBMs — designated “Satan II” missiles in the West — to gradually
replace about 40 Soviet-built R-36M missiles. Sarmat has had only one
known successful test, and reportedly suffered a massive explosion
during an abortive test last month.
The navy commissioned seven new Borei-class atomic-powered submarines,
each with 16 Bulava nuclear-tipped missiles, and plans to build five
more. They are intended to form the core of the triad’s naval component
alongside a few Soviet-era nuclear subs still operating.
Russia still relies on Soviet-built Tu-95 and Tu-160 strategic bombers
carrying nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. Moscow has restarted production
of the supersonic Tu-160 that was halted after the 1991 Soviet collapse,
aiming to build several dozen modernized aircraft with new engines and
avionics.
Russia's non-strategic nuclear weapons
The U.S. estimates that Russia has between 1,000 and 2,000
non-strategic, or tactical, nuclear weapons intended for use on the
battlefield that typically are far less powerful than the strategic
warheads capable of destroying entire cities.
Russia has high-precision ground-launched Iskander missiles with a range
of up to 500 kilometers (310 miles), which can be fitted with either a
conventional or a nuclear warhead.
The air force has a fleet of MiG-31 fighter jets that carry a hypersonic
Kinzhal missile, which can be equipped with a nuclear or conventional
warhead. Russia has widely used conventional versions of both Iskander
and Kinzhal against Ukraine.
As part of the Kremlin’s nuclear messaging, Russia and ally Belarus held
drills to train their troops with the battlefield nuclear weapons in
May, shortly after Putin began his fifth term.
MAD and Russia’s nuclear doctrine
Moscow and Washington have relied for decades on nuclear deterrence
under the concept of mutually assured destruction — MAD for short —
based on the assumption that an overwhelming retaliation would
discourage either side from launching an attack.
Russia’s nuclear doctrine adopted in 2020 envisaged using such ultimate
weapons in response to a nuclear strike or an attack with conventional
weapons that threatens “the very existence of the Russian state.” Moscow
hawks criticized that document as too vague, urging Putin to toughen it.
Last month, he warned the U.S. and NATO allies that allowing Ukraine to
use Western-supplied longer-range weapons for strikes deep inside Russia
would put NATO at war with his country.
[to top of second column]
|
In this image taken from video released by Russian Defense Ministry
Press Service on Oct. 26, 2022, a Yars intercontinental ballistic
missile is test-fired as part of Russia's nuclear drills from a
launch site in Plesetsk, northwestern Russia. (Russian Defense
Ministry Press Service via AP, File)
He reinforced the message by announcing a new version of the nuclear
doctrine that considers a conventional attack on Russia by a
nonnuclear nation that is supported by a nuclear power to be a joint
attack on his country — a clear warning to the U.S. and other allies
of Kyiv.
Putin also declared the revised document envisages possible nuclear
weapons use in case of a massive air attack, holding the door open
to a potential nuclear response to any aerial assault — an ambiguity
intended to deter the West.
Changes in the doctrine suggest Russia “is doubling down on its
strategy of relying on nuclear weapons for coercive purposes” in the
war in Ukraine, said Heather Williams, director of the Project on
Nuclear Issues at the Center for Strategic and International
Studies, in a commentary.
The future for arms control
The 2010 New START U.S.-Russian arms reduction treaty, the last
remaining arms control pact between Moscow and Washington that
expires in 2026, limits each country to no more than 1,550 deployed
nuclear warheads and 700 deployed missiles and bombers.
In February 2023, Putin suspended Russia’s participation in New
START, but vowed that Russia would abide by its limits.
In July, Putin declared Russia will launch production of
ground-based intermediate range missiles that were banned under the
now-defunct U.S. Soviet INF Treaty. The 1987 pact banned missiles
with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,410 miles). He
said Moscow will respond in kind to the planned deployment of U.S.
intermediate-range missiles to Germany, taking steps to “mirror”
Washington’s move.
Even as U.S.-Russian tensions soared to their highest point since
the Cold War amid fighting in Ukraine, Washington has urged Moscow
to resume dialogue on nuclear arms control. Putin rejected the
offer, saying such negotiations are meaningless while the U.S. is
openly seeking to inflict a strategic defeat to Russia in Ukraine.
Resuming nuclear testing
Russian hawks are calling for a resumption of nuclear tests to
demonstrate Moscow’s readiness to use its atomic arsenal and force
the West to limit aid for Kyiv.
Putin said Russia could resume testing if the U.S. does so first, a
move that would end a global ban in place after the demise of the
USSR.
Last month, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said the nuclear
test range on the Arctic archipelago of Novaya Zemlya is ready to
resume tests if the U.S. does so.
Prospective new weapons
In 2018, Putin revealed an array of new weapons, claiming they would
render any prospective U.S. missile defenses useless.
They include the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle, capable of
flying 27 times faster than the speed of sound and making sharp
maneuvers to dodge an enemy’s missile shield. The first such units
have already entered service.
Putin also mentioned the nuclear-armed and atomic-powered Poseidon
underwater drone, designed to explode near coastlines and cause a
radioactive tsunami. Earlier this year, he said Poseidon tests are
nearing completion, without giving details.
Also under development is an atomic-powered cruise missile, a
concept that dates to the Cold War. But the missile, called the
Burevestnik, or Petrel, has raised skepticism among experts, who
cite technological obstacles and radiation safety concerns. During
tests in 2019, an explosion at a naval range on the White Sea
reportedly involving the Burevestnik killed five engineers and two
servicemen, and caused a brief spike in radiation.
Putin said this year its development was in the final stages and the
military has reportedly built a base for the missiles in the Vologda
region of northwestern Russia.
—
The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage
from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation.
The AP is solely responsible for all content.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |