The first presidential election since the Jan. 6 attack will test new
guardrails from Congress
Send a link to a friend
[October 29, 2024]
By LISA MASCARO
WASHINGTON (AP) — This presidential election, the first since the Jan.
6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol, will be a stress test of the new
systems and guardrails that Congress put in place to ensure America’s
long tradition of the peaceful transfer of presidential power.
As Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris race toward the
finish, pro-democracy advocates and elected officials are preparing for
a volatile period in the aftermath of Election Day, as legal challenges
are filed, bad actors spread misinformation and voters wait for Congress
to affirm the results.
“One of the unusual characteristics of this election is that so much of
the potential danger and so many of the attacks on the election system
are focused on the post-election period,” said Wendy Weiser, vice
president for democracy at the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice.
After the Jan. 6 attack, Congress set out to shore up the process and
prevent a repeat of that unprecedented period when Trump, joined by some
GOP allies in Congress, refused to concede defeat to President Joe
Biden. Trump spent months pushing dozens of failed legal cases before
sending his supporters to the U.S. Capitol, where they disrupted the
electoral count with a bloody riot. He faces a federal indictment for
the scheme, which included slates of fake electors from states falsely
claiming he won.
While the new Electoral Count Reform Act approved by Congress has
clarified the post-election processes — to more speedily resolve legal
challenges and reinforce that the vice president has no ability to
change the election outcome on Jan. 6 — the new law is by no means
ironclad.
Much depends on the people involved, from the presidential winners and
losers to the elected leaders in Congress and the voters across America
putting their trust in the democratic system that has stood for more
than 200 years.
Voters are worried about post-election strife
A poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research
found that American voters are approaching the election with deep unease
about what could follow.
Dick Gephardt, the former House leader, now serves on the executive
board of the nonpartisan Keep our Republic, which has been working to
provide civic education about the process in the presidential
battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
“We are concerned about one thing and one thing only: Can Americans
still have valid trust in elections and can we have consistently a
peaceful transfer of power in all offices, including the presidency?”
Gephardt said in a briefing earlier this month.
“January 6th in 2021 was really a wake-up call, I think, for all of us,”
he said.
It’s not just the onslaught of legal challenges that worries democracy
groups, as dozens of cases already have been filed by both Republicans
and Democrats even before Election Day. They say the sheer volume of
cases has the potential to sow doubt in the election tally and give rise
to disinformation, both domestic and foreign, as happened in 2020 when
Trump's legal team unfurled far-flung theories that proved to be wildly
inaccurate.
As Trump runs to retake the White House, he is already setting the stage
for challenges to the election he wants to be “too big to rig.” The
Republican National Committee has made legal strategy a cornerstone of
its Election Integrity program.
[to top of second column]
|
Trump is backed by Republicans on Capitol Hill, including House
Speaker Mike Johnson, who has adopted similar language, saying he
would accept the results only if the election is free and fair.
“We’re going to have the peaceful transition of power,” said
Johnson, who led one of Trump's 2020 legal challenges, on CBS. “I
believe President Trump’s going to win, and this will be taken care
of.”
One specific line of attack from House Republicans has been to
suggest there will be illegal voting by noncitizens, even though it
is a crime to do so, and state and federal reviews have found it to
be extremelyrare. Johnson has pointed to past House races, including
one in Iowa in 2020 that was won by six votes, to bolster his
concerns.
Rep. Joseph Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the Committee
on House Administration, said Johnson is “saying the quiet part out
loud," signaling the way Republicans may challenge the outcome.
That “troubles me,” he said.
What comes between election and inauguration?
At the Brennan Center, they’ve conducted war-game-like scenarios for
what could happen after the election, at a time when state election
officials are facing a resurgence in conspiracy theories and
misinformation about voting.
A series of deadlines between Election Day on Nov. 5 and
Inauguration Day on Jan. 20 are built into the process, once routine
steps that are now important milestones that can be met — or missed.
States are required to certify their electors by Dec. 11 in advance
of a meeting of the Electoral College, which is set this year on
Dec. 17.
The new Congress convenes Jan. 3 to elect a House speaker and swear
in lawmakers. Then, on Jan. 6, Congress holds a joint session to
accept the electoral count from the states — a typically ceremonial
session presided over by the vice president.
To fortify the process in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack, the
Electoral Count Reform Act instituted several changes intended to
shore up the process and make sure the disputes are resolved by the
time the Congress meets. Legal challenges to the results are to be
more quickly resolved, under an expedited timeline for judicial
review, all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. If a county
refuses to certify its results, as some did during the 2022 midterm
elections, the governor has more authority to certify the state's
tally.
On Jan. 6, the law now requires 20% of the House and Senate to
challenge a state's electors to force a vote on rejecting them,
rather than a single member threshold from each chamber.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who had been a chief architect of the
new law with Republican Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said they did
“the best we could” to protect the process.
“You know people have a right, if they have a problem with the
election, to go to court and be heard,” Lofgren said. “The thing is,
once that's over, it's over.”
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|