Trump hush money sentencing delayed until after election
Send a link to a friend
[September 07, 2024]
By Luc Cohen
NEW YORK (Reuters) -A New York judge on Friday delayed former U.S.
President Donald Trump's sentencing in his hush money criminal case
until after the Nov. 5 election, writing that he wants to avoid the
unwarranted perception of a political motive.
Trump, the Republican nominee for president, had previously been
scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 18. His lawyers in August asked
Justice Juan Merchan to push back his sentencing date until after the
vote, citing "naked election-interference objectives." Manhattan
District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the charges against Trump, is
a Democrat.
Merchan said on Friday he now planned to sentence Trump on Nov. 26,
unless the case is dismissed before then.
"The imposition of sentence will be adjourned to avoid any appearance -
however unwarranted - that the proceeding has been affected by or seeks
to affect the approaching Presidential election in which the Defendant
is a candidate," the judge wrote. "The Court is a fair, impartial and
apolitical institution."
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he appreciated that
Merchan noted the sentencing would only take place if the judge denies a
pending motion by his lawyers to toss out the jury's verdict.
"This case should be rightfully terminated, as we prepare for the Most
Important Election in the History of our Country," Trump wrote.
In the first-ever criminal trial of a former or current U.S. president,
Trump was convicted on May 30 on 34 felony counts of falsifying business
records to cover up his then-lawyer's $130,000 payment to porn star
Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual
encounter she says she had with Trump a decade earlier.
Trump denies the encounter and has vowed to appeal the verdict once he
is sentenced.
A spokesperson for Bragg said, "The Manhattan D.A.'s Office stands ready
for sentencing on the new date set by the court."
'THREADED THE NEEDLE'
In his four-page ruling, Merchan wrote that he would rule Trump's
request to overturn the conviction due to the U.S. Supreme Court's
landmark decision on presidential immunity on Nov. 12.
He had previously planned to rule on Sept. 16.
[to top of second column]
|
Donald Trump, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, August 17, 2024. REUTERS/Jeenah
Moon
The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling, which related to a separate criminal
case Trump faces, found that presidents cannot be criminally
prosecuted for their official acts, and that evidence of presidents'
official actions cannot be used to help prove criminal cases
involving unofficial actions.
Prosecutors with Bragg's office argued their case involved Trump's
personal conduct, not official acts, so there was no reason to
overturn the verdict.
But they took no position on Trump's request to delay sentencing,
saying in an Aug. 16 filing they deferred to Merchan on the
question. The prosecutors said an appellate court could delay the
sentencing anyway to give itself time to consider Trump's arguments,
a move they said would be "disruptive."
In declining to advocate for a sentencing date before the election,
Bragg may have been conscious of Trump's oft-repeated claim of
election interference, said George Grasso, a retired New York state
judge who attended Trump's trial.
"He's probably appropriately sensitive to opening himself up to
charges from Trump and Trump supporters that he's being too
political," Grasso said. "He threaded the needle."
Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years in
prison, though punishments such as fines or probation are more
common.
If Trump wins the White House, he could potentially order the
Department of Justice to drop federal election interference charges
against him. He would not have the authority to end the New York
state case or an election interference case in Georgia.
(Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne and
Jonathan Oatis)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]This material
may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|