Google's Privacy Sandbox adoption costs burden small ad-tech firms
Send a link to a friend
[September 09, 2024] By
Akash Sriram and Harshita Mary Varghese
(Reuters) - Smaller ad-tech firms are raising competition concerns over
Google's long-brewing cookies alternative, Privacy Sandbox, at a time
when the internet giant's digital ads business is already under U.S. and
UK scrutiny.
The U.S. and UK regulators suspect that Privacy Sandbox, which has been
in the making for five years, could give Google too much control over
the digital advertising market, harming competition.
Google's dominance through Chrome and Android platforms, which command
the lion's share of internet users, makes adapting to Privacy Sandbox a
critical necessity for ad-tech firms.
However, the investigations and potential technology development delays
are hurting smaller ad-tech firms, as the burgeoning costs due to
adoption delays for Privacy Sandbox will put them at a disadvantage
against well-heeled rivals.
At least 11 ad executives told Reuters that Privacy Sandbox may create
an uneven playing field that favors larger firms with greater funding
and technical prowess.
Privacy Sandbox is a set of technologies that aims to enhance user
privacy by anonymizing data, implementing stricter access controls, and
targeting groups of users rather than individuals. It was developed to
replace cookies, which are used for tracking and targeting individual
users.
Google's initial plan to phase out third-party cookies in Chrome and
replace them with the Privacy Sandbox met with significant opposition
from ad-tech companies and antitrust regulators, compelling the search
giant to backtrack.
"We've designed and implemented the Privacy Sandbox to support a
competitive and thriving marketplace," the internet giant said, adding
that Google has seen the ad industry investing in solutions to move away
from third-party cookies.
AN UNEVEN PLAYING FIELD
"Smaller ad-tech companies simply do not have the engineering teams or
financial resources to effectively build out functional Privacy Sandbox
platforms that can be used at scale - they are at a complete
disadvantage," said Drew Stein, CEO of ad-tech firm Audigent.
[to top of second column] |
The logo of Google is seen outside Google Bay View facilities during
the Made by Google event in Mountain View, California, U.S. August
13, 2024. REUTERS/Manuel Orbegozo/File Photo
The firms face greater financial risk as Privacy Sandbox's uncertain
timeline extends development costs beyond the initial $5 million to
$10 million investment they had expected.
Stein said Audigent, which helps advertisers improve ad targeting
and publishers boost ad revenue, has invested "several million
dollars" into Privacy Sandbox over the past few years, representing
a substantial investment considering its annual revenue of about
$150 million.
Meanwhile, large firms such as Raptive and Index Exchange have
invested less than 3% of their revenue towards engineering resources
for Privacy Sandbox, according to sources familiar with the matter.
"Having a whole developers' team, spending multiple years on a
project is a huge investment for a small-medium sized company," said
Luckey Harpley, staff product manager at Remerge.
Experts said while larger ad-tech firms such as Taboola and Index
Exchange might be less impacted by the introduction of the new
technologies, regulatory efforts to ensure fair competition will be
crucial in preventing Google from further consolidating its dominant
position.
"I don't think Google's going to wind up in the sort of kingpin
position that some people might say it will," said Dennis Buchheim,
CTO at ThinkMedium and former CEO of IAB Tech Lab.
"Don't think it's going to be allowed."
(Reporting by Akash Sriram and Harshita Mary Varghese in Bengaluru;
Additional reporting by Kenrick Cai in San Francisco; Editing by
Shinjini Ganguli)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|