Jury selection begins in trial of former AT&T Illinois boss accused of
bribing Madigan
Send a link to a friend
[September 11, 2024]
By HANNAH MEISEL
Capitol News Illinois
hmeisel@capitolnewsillinois.com
CHICAGO – Jury selection is set to begin Tuesday in the trial of former
AT&T Illinois president Paul La Schiazza, who federal prosecutors allege
bribed once-powerful Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan in exchange
for favorable legislation in Springfield.
It’s the last in a series of related trials that have played out in
Chicago’s Dirksen Federal Courthouse over the last 18 months leading up
to Madigan’s own bribery and racketeering trial, which is scheduled to
begin Oct. 8. A jury last year convicted four former executives and
lobbyists for electric utility Commonwealth Edison on charges that they
bribed Madigan with jobs and contracts for his allies over a nine-year
period to help the utility win its legislative battles.
La Schiazza is accused of a similar scheme, albeit much smaller in
scale. Instead of dozens of jobs and contracts for Madigan allies,
AT&T’s alleged bribery involved the utility funneling payments to one
man: former Democratic state Rep. Eddie Acevedo, who was also a
subcontractor lobbyist for ComEd for nearly a decade.
Acevedo, who allegedly did little to no work for either utility, already
served a brief stint in prison for tax evasion connected to the larger
federal probe of Madigan’s world and is expected to testify in the
former speaker’s trial.
La Schiazza approved AT&T’s retention of Acevedo in the spring of 2017,
when the utility was making another run at crucial legislation that had
failed twice. AT&T wanted out from under an Illinois law that mandated
the telecom giant provide traditional landline service. The utility said
it was costing millions of dollars to maintain an aging wire system and
was preventing greater investment in more future-oriented technologies,
like cellular and internet service.
AT&T got its win in July of that year, with the General Assembly
overriding then-Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto of the legislation, which
centered around a hike in 911 service fees included in the bill.
Less than a week later, La Schiazza received an email from Madigan’s son
Andrew requesting that he sponsor a nonprofit event, according to a
filing from prosecutors this spring. In the email, Andrew Madigan said
his request was “at the suggestion of our good friend Mike McClain,”
referring to the speaker’s close confidant who’d helped to arrange
Acevedo’s lobbying contract earlier that year.
McClain, who in 2017 had recently retired from his decadeslong career as
ComEd’s top outside lobbyist, was convicted last year as part of the
“ComEd Four” and is also Madigan’s co-defendant in next month’s
racketeering trial. Prosecutors have relied heavily on McClain’s own
words in wiretapped phone calls, in which he describes himself as “an
agent” of Madigan, both before and after officially retiring from
lobbying.
La Schiazza forwarded Andrew Madigan’s request to a colleague with the
note “this will be endless.”
“I suspect the ‘thank you’ opportunities will be plentiful,” the
colleague replied, which the feds contend was a reference to the
landline legislation’s passage.
“Yep … we are on the friends and family plan now,” La Schiazza quipped
in his response.
Prosecutors claim that exchange, which is expected to be shown at trial,
“demonstrates that defendant knew AT&T’s responses to Madigan’s requests
played a role in their legislative success.”
[to top of second column]
|
The Dirksen Federal Courthouse is pictured in Chicago. (Capitol News
Illinois photo by Hannah Meisel)
But La Schiazza claims the request from Andrew Madigan for the nonprofit
event sponsorship is exactly the type of “gratuity” the U.S. Supreme
Court earlier this summer ruled does not fall under the federal bribery
statute.
Defendants in all the Madigan-related cases, including the
already-convicted “ComEd Four,” have sought to use the high court’s
decision to undermine the feds’ charges, arguing the decision makes
clear that bribery must involve a clear quid pro quo agreement before
any “official acts.”
But while the judge in the ComEd case is reviewing arguments for
overturning those convictions, the judges overseeing both Madigan’s and
La Schiazza’s cases have not yet been convinced by arguments to nix some
of the feds’ bribery charges. In La Schiazza’s case, prosecutors point
to emails in which high-ranking AT&T Illinois employees were discussing
their strategy around retaining Acevedo in spring 2017.
According to the feds, La Schiazza said he had no objection to the plan
to pay Acevedo $2,500 a month “as long as you are sure we will get
credit and the box checked.” An email sent by AT&T’s legislative affairs
director asked two utility executives if they were “100% certain” the
utility would “would get credit from the powers that be,” which the feds
claim was a “veiled reference to Madigan.”
“I would hope that as long as we explain the approach to McClain and
(Acevedo) gets the money then the ultimate objective is reached,” one of
the executives wrote back, according to the feds.
But in reply, the legislative affairs director responded that “hope” was
not enough for La Schiazza: “I don’t think Paul wants this based on
‘hope,’” the email said. “We need to confirm prior to executing this
strategy.”
According to prosecutors, McClain cooked up a cover story for Acevedo’s
hiring: the former representative was to prepare a report on “the
political dynamics of the Latino Caucus of the General Assembly and the
Chicago City Council.” In a May filing, prosecutors said the
intermediary lobbyist who handled payments to Acevedo is expected to
testify at trial that reasoning was completely made up “and merely gave
AT&T cover if it ever had to explain why (Acevedo) was hired.”
That lobbyist, Tom Cullen, was a longtime Madigan staffer whose name
appeared on handwritten notes shown in last year’s ComEd trial, which
McClain had dubbed the “Magic Lobbying List” in an email printout seized
by the feds during a raid of his home in 2019.
Cullen, who has not been charged with anything, also testified at last
summer’s trial of longtime Madigan chief of staff Tim Mapes, who was
convicted of perjury and attempted obstruction of justice for lying to a
grand jury about what he knew about Madigan and McClain’s friendship.
According to the feds, Cullen is expected to testify that “there was
never a real expectation that (Acevedo) would do any work for (Cullen)
or for AT&T,” and that he never “even asked for an assignment.”
Capitol News Illinois is
a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is
distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide.
It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert
R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the
Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial
Association. |