Pennsylvania court rules against allowing misdated mail-in votes
Send a link to a friend
[September 14, 2024]
By Kanishka Singh
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Friday reversed
a lower court's ruling from almost two weeks ago that had said the two
most populous counties of the battleground state will not be able to
throw out mail-in votes over incorrect envelope dates. |
Mail-in ballots sit waiting to be processed at the Orange County
Registrar of Voters during a media tour showing ballot security at the
facility, in Santa Ana, California, U.S., November 1, 2022. REUTERS/Mike
Blake/File Photo |
KEY QUOTES
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Friday ruling said Commonwealth
Court of Pennsylvania "lacked subject matter jurisdiction to
review the matter," according to a court filing.
The Republican Party welcomed the ruling. Voting rights
advocates including the American Civil Liberties Union said they
will look at pursuing additional legal options and said the
ruling was a "setback for Pennsylvania voters."
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Pennsylvania is a key battleground state in a tight presidential
race for the Nov. 5 U.S. elections in which Democratic Vice
President Kamala Harris faces Republican former President Donald
Trump.
Battleground states are those where elections were won by a
narrow margin of 3 percentage points or less in the last
contest. Pennsylvania is one of seven such states.
The ruling will mean that state election officials will not be
counting misdated ballots in the election unless courts
intervened again before the elections.
CONTEXT
The late August ruling in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
applied to the Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties. It had said
that refusal to count undated or incorrectly dated but timely
mail ballots submitted by eligible voters violated the right to
vote.
Officials disqualified nearly 16,000 mail-in ballots for
irregularities during April's primary election. Almost half were
disqualified because of issues such as missing signatures and
wrong dates on outer envelopes, according to the New York Times.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; editing by Miral
Fahmy)
[© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All
rights reserved.]
Copyright 2022 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|
|