Which candidate is better for tech innovation? Venture capitalists
divided on Harris or Trump
Send a link to a friend
[September 16, 2024] By
SARAH PARVINI and MATT O'BRIEN
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Being a venture capitalist carries a
lot of prestige in Silicon Valley. Those who choose which startups to
fund see themselves as fostering the next big waves of technology.
So when some of the industry’s biggest names endorsed former President
Donald Trump and the onetime VC he picked for a running mate, JD Vance,
people took notice.
Then hundreds of other VCs -- some high profile, others lesser-known --
threw their weight behind Vice President Kamala Harris, drawing battle
lines over which presidential candidate will be better for tech
innovation and the conditions startups need to thrive. For years, many
of Silicon Valley's political discussions took place behind closed
doors. Now, those casual debates have gone public — on podcasts, social
media and online manifestos.
Venture capitalist and Harris backer Stephen DeBerry says some of his
best friends support Trump. Though centered in a part of Northern
California known for liberal politics, the investors who help finance
the tech industry have long been a more politically divided bunch.
“We ski together. Our families are together. We’re super tight,” said
DeBerry, who runs the Bronze Venture Fund. “This is not about not being
able to talk to each other. I love these guys -- they’re almost all
guys. They’re dear friends. We just have a difference of perspective on
policy issues.”
It remains to be seen if the more than 700 venture capitalists who've
voiced support for a movement called “VCs for Kamala” will match the
pledges of Trump's well-heeled supporters such as Elon Musk and Peter
Thiel. But the effort marks “the first time I’ve seen a galvanized group
of folks from our industry coming together and coalescing around our
shared values," DeBerry said.
“There are a lot of practical reasons for VCs to support Trump,"
including policies that could drive corporate profits and stock market
values and favor wealthy benefactors, said David Cowan, an investor at
Bessemer Venture Partners. But Cowan said he is supporting Harris as a
VC with a “long-term investment horizon” because a “Trump world reeling
from rampant income inequality, raging wars and global warming is not an
attractive environment” for funding healthy businesses.
Several prominent VCs have voiced their support for Trump on Musk's
social platform X. Public records show some of them have donated to a
new, pro-Trump super PAC called America PAC, whose donors include
powerful tech industry conservatives with ties to SpaceX and Paypal and
who run in Musk’s social circle. Also driving support is Trump's embrace
of cryptocurrency and promise to end an enforcement crackdown on the
industry.
Although some Biden policies have alienated parts of the investment
sector concerned about tax policy, antitrust scrutiny or overregulation,
Harris' bid for the presidency has reenergized interest from VCs who
until recently sat on the sidelines. Some of that excitement is due to
existing relationships with Silicon Valley that are borne out of Harris'
career in the San Francisco area and her time as California's attorney
general.
“We buy risk, right? And we’re trying to buy the right type of risk,”
Leslie Feinzaig, founder of “VCs for Kamala” said in an interview. “It’s
really hard for these companies that are trying to build products and
scale to do so in an unpredictable institutional environment.”
The schism in tech has left some firms split in their allegiances.
Although venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, founders
of the firm that is their namesake, endorsed Trump, one of their firm’s
general partners, John O’Farrell, pledged his support for Harris.
O’Farrell declined further comment.
Doug Leone, the former managing partner of Sequoia Capital, endorsed
Trump in June, expressing concern on X “about the general direction of
our country, the state of our broken immigration system, the ballooning
deficit, and the foreign policy missteps, among other issues.” But
Leone’s longtime business partner at Sequoia, Michael Moritz, wrote in
the Financial Times that tech leaders supporting Trump “are making a big
mistake.”
Shaun Maguire, a partner at Sequoia, posted on X that he donated
$300,000 to Trump’s campaign after supporting Hilary Clinton in the 2016
presidential election. Federal Election Commission records show that
Maguire donated $500,000 to America PAC in June; Leone donated $1
million.
[to top of second column] |
Stephen DeBerry, Founder & Managing Partner of the Bronze Venture
Fund, poses for photos in Mill Valley, Calif., Thursday, Aug. 8,
2024. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
“The area where I disagree with Republicans the most is
on women’s rights. And I’m sure I’ll disagree with some of Trump’s
policies in the future,” Maguire wrote. “But in general I think he was
surprisingly prescient.”
Feinzaig, managing director at venture firm Graham & Walker, said that
she launched “VCs for Kamala” because she felt frustrated that “the
loudest voices” were starting to “sound like they were speaking for the
entire industry.”
Much of the VC discourse about elections is in response to a July
podcast and manifesto in which Andreessen and Horowitz backed Trump and
outlined their vision of a “Little Tech Agenda” that they said
contrasted with the policies sought by Big Tech.
They accused the U.S. government of increasing hostility toward startups
and the VCs who fund them, citing Biden's proposed higher taxes on the
wealthy and corporations and regulations they said could hobble emerging
industries involving blockchain and artificial intelligence.
Vance, a U.S. senator from Ohio who spent time in San Francisco working
at Thiel's investment firm, voiced a similar perspective about “little
tech” more than a month before he was chosen as Trump’s running mate.
“The donors who were really involved in Silicon Valley in a pro-Trump
way, they’re not big tech, right? They’re little tech. They’re starting
innovative companies. They don’t want the government to destroy their
ability to innovate," Vance said in an interview on Fox News in June.
Days earlier, Vance had joined Trump at a San Francisco fundraiser at
the home of venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks,
a longtime conservative. Vance said Trump spoke to about 100 attendees
that included “some of the leading innovators in AI.”
DeBerry said he doesn’t disagree with everything Andreesen Horowitz
founders espouse, particularly their wariness about powerful companies
controlling the agencies that regulate them. But he objects to their
“little tech” framing, especially coming from a multibillion-dollar
investment firm that he says is hardly the voice of the little guy. For
DeBerry, whose firm focuses on social impact, the choice is not between
big and little tech but “chaos and stability," with Harris representing
stability.
Complicating the allegiances is that a tough approach to breaking up the
monopoly power of big corporations no longer falls along partisan lines.
Vance has spoken favorably of Lina Khan, who Biden picked to lead the
Federal Trade Commission and has taken on several tech giants.
Meanwhile, some of the most influential VCs backing Harris -- such as
LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman; and Sun Microsystems co-founder Vinod
Khosla, an early investor in ChatGPT-maker OpenAI -- have sharply
criticized Khan’s approach.
U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat whose California district encompasses
part of Silicon Valley, said Trump supporters are a vocal minority
reflecting a “third or less” of the region’s tech community. But while
the White House has appealed to tech entrepreneurs with its investments
in clean energy, electric vehicles and semiconductors, Khanna said
Democrats must do a better job of showing that they understand the
appeal of digital assets.
“I do think that the perceived lack of embrace of Bitcoin and the
blockchain has hurt the Democratic Party among the young generation and
among young entrepreneurs,” Khanna said.
Naseem Sayani, a general partner at Emmeline Ventures, said Andreessen
and Horowitz's support of Trump became a lightning rod for those in tech
who do not back the Republican nominee. Sayani signed onto "VCs for
Kamala," she said, because she wanted the types of businesses that she
helps fund to know that the investor community is not monolithic.
“We’re not single-profile founders anymore,” she said. "There’s women,
there’s people of color, there’s all the intersections. How can they
feel comfortable building businesses when the environment they’re in
doesn’t actually support their existence in some ways?”
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All
rights reserved |