Lawyers question whether a drugged French woman was truly unconscious
during alleged rapes
Send a link to a friend
[September 19, 2024]
By DIANE JEANTET and MARINE LESPRIT
AVIGNON, France (AP) — Lawyers for some of the men accused of raping an
unconscious French woman who had been drugged by her husband questioned
her Wednesday about her habits, personal life and sex life, and even
questioned whether she was truly unconscious during the encounters.
Gisèle Pelicot's testimony came a day after her ex-husband, Dominique
Pelicot, told the court that for nearly 10 years, he drugged her and
invited dozens of men to rape her as she lay defenseless. She fiercely
rejected any suggestion that she was anything but an unwitting victim.
“Since I’ve arrived in this courtroom, I’ve felt humiliated. I am
treated like an alcoholic, an accomplice. ... I have heard it all,” she
said at the start of the day's proceedings, breaking at times with the
remarkable calm and stoicism she has shown throughout the often
harrowing trial that has gripped France.
Gisèle Pelicot, who was married to her husband for 50 years and shares
three children with him, has become a hero to many rape victims and a
symbol of the fight against sexual violence in France for waiving her
anonymity in the case, letting the trial be public and appearing openly
in front of the media.
Her ex-husband and the 50 other men on trial, who range in age from 26
to 74, face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.
Many of the defendants deny having raped Gisèle Pelicot. Some claim they
were tricked by Dominique Pelicot, others say they believed she was
consenting, and others argue that her husband’s consent was sufficient.
Gisèle Pelicot and her lawyers say the preponderance of evidence --
thousands of videos and photos shot by her ex-husband of men having sex
with her while she appeared to be unconscious -- should be enough to
prove she was a victim and was entirely unaware of what Dominique
Pelicot was subjecting her to from at least 2011 until 2020.
But on Wednesday, defense lawyers focused their questions on the notion
of consent and whether she was aware of what was happening at any point
during some of the 90 sexual encounters that prosecutors believe were
rapes.
“Don’t you have tendencies that you are not comfortable with?” one
lawyer asked Gisèle Pelicot.
[to top of second column]
|
This courtroom sketch by Valentin Pasquier shows Gisèle Pelicot,
left, and her ex-husband Dominique Pelicot, right, during his trial,
at the Avignon court house, in Avignon, southern France, Tuesday,
Sept. 17, 2024. (AP Photo/Valentin Pasquier)
“I’m not even going to answer this question, which I find insulting,”
she responded, her voice breaking. “I understand why victims of rape
don’t press charges. We really spill everything out into the open to
humiliate the victim.”
Another lawyer asked whether she was indeed unconscious during one of
the encounters captured on video.
“I didn't give my consent to Mr. Pelicot or these men behind me for one
second,” she said, referring to her ex-husband's co-defendants. “In the
state I was in, I could not respond to anybody. I was in a state of coma
— the videos will attest to it.”
The line of questioning upset her. “Since when can a man decide for his
wife?” she said, stressing that only one of her ex-husband's 50 co-
defendants had refused his invitation to rape her. That man met
Dominique Pelicot online and invited him to rape his own wife, who was
also drugged, authorities contend.
“What are these men? Are they degenerates?" she said angrily. "They have
committed rapes. That's all I have to say.”
Another questioned the time and date stamps on the videos, and whether
she thought the sexual acts lasted as long as the stamps suggested.
“Rape is not a question of time,” she said.
“To talk of minutes, seconds. ... It does not matter how long they
spent. It’s so degrading, humiliating what I am hearing in this room,"
she said.
At one point, Dominique Pelicot, who already said during the trial that
all of the accusations against him are true, came out in support of his
ex-wife, saying, “Stop suspecting her all the time ... I did many things
without her knowing.”
On Tuesday, he testified that all of his co-defendants knew exactly what
they were doing when he had them over, saying, “They knew everything.
They can’t say otherwise.”
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |