Wisconsin Supreme Court says Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s name will remain on
swing state's ballot
Send a link to a friend
[September 28, 2024]
By SCOTT BAUER and TODD RICHMOND
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Friday that
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s name will remain on the state's presidential
ballot, upholding a lower court's ruling that candidates can only be
removed from the ballot if they die.
The unanimous decision from the liberal-controlled court marks the
latest twist in Kennedy’s quest to get his name off ballots in key
battleground states where the race between Republican Donald Trump and
Democratic nominee Kamala Harris is close. Kennedy’s attorney in
Wisconsin, Joseph Bugni, declined to comment on the ruling.
The decision came after more than 418,000 absentee ballots have already
been sent to voters. As of Thursday, nearly 28,000 had been returned,
according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
Kennedy suspended his campaign in August and endorsed Trump. Earlier
this month a divided North Carolina Supreme Court kept him off the
ballot there while the Michigan Supreme Court reversed a lower court
decision and kept him on.
Kennedy filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin on Sept. 3 seeking a court order
removing him from the ballot. He argued that third-party candidates are
discriminated against because state law treats them differently than
Republicans and Democrats running for president.
He pointed out that Republicans and Democrats have until 5 p.m. on the
first Tuesday in September before an election to certify their
presidential nominee but that independent candidates like himself can
only withdraw before an Aug. 6 deadline for submitting nomination
papers.
Dane County Circuit Judge Stephen Ehlke ruled Sept. 16 that Wisconsin
law clearly states that once candidates file valid nomination papers,
they remain on the ballot unless they die. The judge added that many
election clerks had already sent ballots out for printing with Kennedy’s
name on them.
Bugni had argued that clerks could cover his name with stickers, the
standard practice when a candidate dies. Ehlke rejected that idea,
saying it would be a logistical nightmare for clerks and that it is not
clear whether the stickers would gum up tabulating machines. He also
predicted lawsuits if clerks failed to completely cover Kennedy's name
or failed to affix a sticker on some number of ballots.
[to top of second column]
|
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., speaks before Republican presidential
nominee former President Donald Trump at a campaign event, Friday,
Sept. 27, 2024 in Walker, Mich. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
The Supreme Court's four liberal justices along with conservative
Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that Kennedy's arguments weren't
developed enough for them to decide whether Ehlke erroneously
exercised his discretion in keeping Kennedy on the ballot. They
noted that Kennedy didn't argue that Ehlke misinterpreted the law
that says only dead candidates can be removed from the ballot.
“We emphasize that we are not making any legal determinations on our
own regarding the claims made by Kennedy and we are not agreeing
with the circuit court’s legal conclusions on those claims. We
simply are unable to make such determinations, given the inadequate
briefing presented to us,” the five justices wrote in six-page
opinion.
Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in a one-page concurrence
that while she doesn't disagree with the five other justices that
Kennedy's arguments were underdeveloped, keeping Kennedy on the
ballot will confuse voters and could tilt the outcome of the
election.
“Voters may cast their ballots in favor of a candidate who withdrew
his candidacy, thereby losing their right to cast a meaningful
vote," she wrote. “Ballots listing a non-candidate mislead voters
and may skew a presidential election. In this case, the damage to
voter participation in electoral democracy is real.”
The court's third conservative, Annette Ziegler, joined Bradley's
concurrence.
The presence of independent and third-party candidates on the ballot
could be a key factor in Wisconsin, where four of the past six
presidential elections have been decided by between about 5,700 to
23,000 votes.
In 2016, Green Party nominee Jill Stein got just over 31,000 votes
in Wisconsin — more than Trump’s winning margin of just under 23,000
votes. Some Democrats blamed her for helping Trump win the state and
the presidency that year.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|