| 
		Judge blocks imports of some Chilean sea bass from Antarctica in fishing 
		feud at bottom of the world
		[April 01, 2025]  By 
		JOSHUA GOODMAN 
		MIAMI (AP) — A federal judge in Florida has blocked the imports of a 
		high-priced fish from protected waters near Antarctica, siding with U.S. 
		regulators who argued they were required to block imports amid a 
		diplomatic feud triggered by Russia's obstruction of longstanding 
		conservation efforts at the bottom of the world.
 Judge David Leibowitz, in a ruling Monday, dismissed a lawsuit filed in 
		2022 by Texas-based Southern Cross Seafoods that alleged it had suffered 
		undue economic harm by what it argued was the U.S. government's 
		arbitrary decision to bar imports of Chilean sea bass.
 
 The case, closely watched by conservation groups and the fishing 
		industry, stems from Russia’s rejection of catch limits for marine life 
		near the South Pole.
 
 Every year for four decades, 26 governments banded together in the 
		Commission on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, or 
		CCAMLR, to set catch limits for Patagonia toothfish, as Chilean sea bass 
		is also known, based on the recommendations of a committee of 
		international scientists.
 
 But in 2021, and ever since, Russian representatives to the treaty 
		organization have refused to sign off on the catch limits in what many 
		see as a part of a broader push by President Vladimir Putin's government 
		to stymie international cooperation on a range of issues. Russia's 
		refusal was an effective veto because the commission works by consensus, 
		meaning any single government can hold up action.
 
 The U.K.’s response to Russia's gambit was to unilaterally set its own 
		catch limit for Chilean sea bass — lower than the never-adopted 
		recommendation of the scientific commission — and issue its own licenses 
		to fish off the coast of South Georgia, an uninhabited island it 
		controls in the South Atlantic. That drew fire from environmentalists as 
		well as U.S. officials, who fear it could encourage even worse abuse, 
		undermining international fisheries management.
 
		
		 
		Leibowitz in his ruling sided with the U.S. government's interpretation 
		of its treaty obligations, warning that the U.K.'s eschewing of the 
		procedures established by CCAMLR risked overfishing in a sensitive part 
		of the South Atlantic and undermining the very essence of the treaty.
 “Unlimited fishing would by no means further the goals of CCAMLR to 
		protect the Antarctic ecosystem,” he wrote. “Allowing one nation to 
		refuse to agree on a catch limit for a particular fish only to then be 
		able to harvest that fish in unlimited quantities would contravene the 
		expressed purposes of CCAMLR.”
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            Fillets of Chilean sea bass caught near the U.K.-controlled South 
			Georgia island are displayed for sale at a Whole Foods Market in 
			Cleveland, Ohio on June 17, 2022. (AP Photo/Joshua Goodman, file) 
            
			
			 The ruling effectively extends an 
			existing ban on imports from all U.K.-licensed fishing vessels 
			operating near South Georgia, which is also claimed by Argentina. 
			However, the fish is still available in the U.S. from suppliers 
			authorized by Australia, France and other countries in areas where 
			Russia did not object to the proposed catch limits.
 Chilean sea bass from South Georgia was for years some of the 
			highest-priced seafood at U.S. supermarkets and for decades the 
			fishery was a poster child for international cooperation, bringing 
			together global powers like Russia, China and the U.S. to protect 
			the chilly, crystal blue southern ocean from the sort of fishing 
			free-for-all seen elsewhere on the high seas.
 
 Southern Cross originally filed it lawsuit in the U.S. Court of 
			International Trade but it was moved last year to federal court in 
			Ft. Lauderdale, where the company received two shipments of seabass 
			from a British-Norwegian fishing company in 2022.
 
 An attorney for Southern Cross, which doesn't have a website and 
			lists as its address a waterfront home in a Houston suburb, declined 
			to comment.
 
 Environmental groups praised the ruling.
 
 “Allowing any country to sidestep agreed limits and fish freely 
			undermines decades of hard-won international cooperation and 
			threatens one of the last intact marine ecosystems on the planet,” 
			said Andrea Kavanagh, who directs Antarctic and Southern Ocean work 
			for Pew Bertarelli Ocean Legacy.
 
 But some fishing industry executives said caving to Russia's 
			geopolitical posturing unnecessarily hurts American consumers and 
			businesses.
 
 “Blocking access to the resource will not improve the fishery’s 
			sustainability but could very well cost U.S. jobs and exacerbate 
			food inflation,” said Gavin Gibbons, the chief strategy officer for 
			The National Fisheries Institute, America’s largest seafood trade 
			association.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			 |