Supreme Court allows Trump administration to cut teacher-training money,
for now
[April 05, 2025]
By MARK SHERMAN and LINDSAY WHITEHURST
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Trump
administration’s plea to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in
teacher-training money as part of its anti-DEI efforts, while a lawsuit
continues.
The justices split 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the
three liberal justices in dissent.
The emergency appeal is among several the high court is considering in
which the Justice Department argues that lower-court judges have
improperly obstructed President Donald Trump’s agenda.
Friday’s order was the first time, in three attempts, that the nation’s
highest court gave the administration what it wanted on an emergency
basis.
The Supreme Court previously sided against the administration in another
lawsuit over nearly $2 billion in foreign aid cuts in another divided
5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett in the majority in both
cases.
It remains to be seen whether Friday's decision marks a narrow win or a
broader shift in Trump's favor.
The Trump administration is facing some 150 lawsuits in lower courts
challenging his flurry of executive orders. That includes about two
dozen over federal funding cuts, some totaling billions of dollars.
The teaching training case deals with cuts to more than 100 programs.
They had been temporarily blocked by a federal judge in Boston, who
found that they were already affecting training programs aimed at
addressing a nationwide teacher shortage.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun issued a temporary restraining order
sought by eight Democratic-led states that argued the cuts were likely
driven by efforts from Trump’s administration to eliminate diversity,
equity and inclusion programs.
The federal appeals court in Boston turned away an appeal from the
administration to allow them to resume.
The Republican president also has signed an executive order calling for
the dismantling of the Education Department, and his administration has
already started overhauling much of its work, including cutting dozens
of contracts it dismissed as “woke” and wasteful.
The two programs at issue — the Teacher Quality Partnership and
Supporting Effective Educator Development — provide more than $600
million in grants for teacher preparation programs, often in subject
areas such as math, science and special education, the states have
argued. They said data has shown the programs had led to increased
teacher retention rates and ensured that educators remain in the
profession beyond five years.
[to top of second column]
|
Students help put away supplies at the end of a reading and writing
lesson at the Head Start program run by Easterseals, an organization
that gets about a third of its funding from the federal government,
Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025, in Miami. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell,
File)
Despite Joun's finding that the programs already were being
affected, the high court's conservative majority wrote that the
states can keep the programs running with their own money for now.
By contrast, the majority said in an unsigned opinion, the federal
government probably wouldn’t be able to recover the cash if it
ultimately wins the lawsuit.
Justice Elena Kagan wrote in dissent that there was no reason for
the court's emergency intervention.
“Nowhere in its papers does the Government defend the legality of
canceling the education grants at issue here,” Kagan wrote.
In a separate opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote, “It is
beyond puzzling that a majority of Justices conceive of the
government’s application as an emergency.”
Roberts joined neither dissent, noting only that he would have
denied the appeal.
The administration halted the programs without notice in February.
Joun, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, found that the
cancellations probably violated a federal law that requires a clear
explanation.
The appellate panel that rejected the administration’s request for a
stay also was made up of judges appointed by Democrats.
Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the ruling as a “significant
victory for President Trump and the rule of law.”
California is leading the ongoing lawsuit, joined by Massachusetts,
New Jersey, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York and Wisconsin.
Boston Public Schools have already had to fire several full-time
employees due to the loss of grant funding, and the College of New
Jersey has also canceled the rest of its teacher-residency program.
California State University has ended support for two dozen students
in a similar program, and eliminated financial assistance for 50
incoming students.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
