|
The
allegations against Musk were filed Wednesday in a federal court
in California as a counterclaim to the Tesla CEO's lawsuit
against OpenAI, which is heading to a jury trial next year.
Musk, an early OpenAI investor who now runs his own AI firm, xAI,
along with Tesla, SpaceX, social media platform X and President
Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, began a
legal offensive against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman more than
a year ago.
He first sued for breach of contract over what he said was the
betrayal of its founding aims as a nonprofit research
laboratory, and later expanded his claims.
A federal judge in March denied Musk’s request for a court order
blocking OpenAI from converting itself to a for-profit company
but said she could expedite a trial to consider Musk’s claims.
She offered to hold a trial later this year, but it has been
pushed back to March 2026.
In this week's counterclaim, OpenAI accuses Musk of making a
“sham bid” in February to buy a controlling stake in the
nonprofit.
Musk and a group of investors offered $97.4 billion for OpenAI's
assets, a number that OpenAI said Musk pulled from the character
974 Praf in the science fiction novel “Look to Windward” by
Scottish writer Iain Banks. Musk has also named some of his
SpaceX machinery after ships in the book.
OpenAI said it “recognized the bid as a feint” but has
repeatedly had to divert resources and “suffered harm as a
result of Musk’s unlawful campaign of harassment, interference,
and misinformation.”
Musk attorney Marc Toberoff responded in an email late Wednesday
and said that if OpenAI's board of directors had “genuinely
considered the bid, as they were obligated to do, they would
have seen how serious it was.”
"It’s telling that having to pay fair market value for OpenAI’s
assets allegedly ‘interferes’ with their business plans,”
Toberoff wrote.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|
|
