| 
		Trump administration freezes $2.2 billion in grants to Harvard over 
		campus activism
		[April 15, 2025]  
		By MICHAEL CASEY 
		BOSTON (AP) — The federal government says it’s freezing more than $2.2 
		billion in grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard University, 
		after the institution said it would defy the Trump administration’s 
		demands to limit activism on campus.
 The hold on Harvard's funding marks the seventh time President Donald 
		Trump's administration has taken the step at one of the nation’s most 
		elite colleges, in an attempt to force compliance with Trump's political 
		agenda. Six of the seven schools are in the Ivy League.
 
 In a letter to Harvard Friday, Trump's administration had called for 
		broad government and leadership reforms at the university, as well as 
		changes to its admissions policies. It also demanded the university 
		audit views of diversity on campus, and stop recognizing some student 
		clubs.
 
 The federal government said almost $9 billion in grants and contracts in 
		total were at risk if Harvard did not comply.
 
 On Monday, Harvard President Alan Garber said the university would not 
		bend to the government's demands.
 
 “The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its 
		constitutional rights,” Garber said in a letter to the Harvard 
		community. “No government — regardless of which party is in power — 
		should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit 
		and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”
 
 Hours later, the government froze billions in Harvard's federal funding.
 
 The first university targeted by the Trump administration was Columbia, 
		which acquiesced to the government’s demands under the threat of 
		billions of dollars in cuts. The administration also has paused federal 
		funding for the University of Pennsylvania, Brown, Princeton, Cornell 
		and Northwestern.
 
		 
		Trump's administration has normalized the extraordinary step of 
		withholding federal money to pressure major academic institutions to 
		comply with the president's political agenda and to influence campus 
		policy. The administration has argued universities allowed antisemitism 
		to go unchecked at campus protests last year against Israel's war in 
		Gaza.
 Harvard, Garber said, already has made extensive reforms to address 
		antisemitism. He said many of the government's demands don't relate to 
		antisemitism, but instead are an attempt to regulate the “intellectual 
		conditions” at Harvard.
 
 Withholding federal funding from Harvard, one of the nation's top 
		research universities in science and medicine, “risks not only the 
		health and well-being of millions of individuals but also the economic 
		security and vitality of our nation.” It also violates the university's 
		First Amendment rights and exceeds the government's authority under 
		Title VI, which prohibits discrimination against students based on their 
		race, color or national origin, Garber said.
 
		
		 
		[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            Hundreds of demonstrators gather on Cambridge Common during a rally 
			at the historic park in Cambridge, Mass., Saturday, April 12, 2025, 
			calling on Harvard University to resist what organizers described as 
			attempts by President Trump to influence the institution. (Erin 
			Clark/The Boston Globe via AP, File) 
            
			
			
			 
            The government's demands included that Harvard institute what it 
			called “merit-based” admissions and hiring policies and conduct an 
			audit of the study body, faculty and leadership on their views about 
			diversity. The administration also called for a ban on face masks at 
			Harvard — an apparent target of pro-Palestinian campus protesters — 
			and pressured the university to stop recognizing or funding “any 
			student group or club that endorses or promotes criminal activity, 
			illegal violence, or illegal harassment.” 
            Harvard's defiance, the federal antisemitism task force said Monday, 
			"reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset that is endemic in our 
			nation’s most prestigious universities and colleges — that federal 
			investment does not come with the responsibility to uphold civil 
			rights laws.
 “The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent 
			years is unacceptable. The harassment of Jewish students is 
			intolerable.”
 
 Trump has promised a more aggressive approach against antisemitism 
			on campus, accusing former President Joe Biden of letting schools 
			off the hook. Trump's administration has opened new investigations 
			at colleges and detained and deported several foreign students with 
			ties to pro-Palestinian protests.
 
 The demands from the Trump administration had prompted a group of 
			Harvard alumni to write to university leaders calling for it to 
			“legally contest and refuse to comply with unlawful demands that 
			threaten academic freedom and university self-governance.”
 
 “Harvard stood up today for the integrity, values, and freedoms that 
			serve as the foundation of higher education,” said Anurima Bhargava, 
			one of the alumni behind the letter. "Harvard reminded the world 
			that learning, innovation and transformative growth will not yield 
			to bullying and authoritarian whims.”
 
 The government's pressure on Harvard also sparked a protest over the 
			weekend from the campus community and residents of Cambridge and a 
			lawsuit from the American Association of University Professors on 
			Friday challenging the cuts.
 
 In their lawsuit, plaintiffs argue that the Trump administration has 
			failed to follow steps required under Title VI before it starts 
			cutting funds, including giving notice of the cuts to both the 
			university and Congress.
 
 “These sweeping yet indeterminate demands are not remedies targeting 
			the causes of any determination of noncompliance with federal law. 
			Instead, they overtly seek to impose on Harvard University political 
			views and policy preferences advanced by the Trump administration 
			and commit the University to punishing disfavored speech,” 
			plaintiffs wrote.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |