Republican-led states keep adding school voucher programs even as
critics worry about cost
[April 28, 2025]
By GEOFF MULVIHILL and KIMBERLEE KRUESI
State lawmakers across the U.S. are pushing to use more taxpayer dollars
to pay for private school tuitions and homeschooling expenses even as
they try to figure out how to budget in a time of economic uncertainty.
A $1 billion-per-year voucher program the Texas Legislature sent to the
governor last week and a longshot push in Congress to expand vouchers
nationally, including to states that have rejected them, are focusing
attention on the issue.
In states that already have programs to pay private education costs for
most students, the expense has quickly gobbled up more of their budgets
as revenue growth has slowed or stalled. Besides Texas, Tennessee
adopted a program this year, and North Dakota gave serious consideration
to one before a veto last week likely ended its prospects this year.
States are required to produce annual spending plans that don't exceed
what they bring in. With pandemic-era federal money mostly phased out,
voucher opponents fear the programs will come at the expense of other
priorities, including public schools.
“Even if they’re being funded by separate revenue sources, it can feel
like school choice programs and public schools are competing for the
same slice of an increasingly smaller pie,” said Page Forrest, who
analyzes state finances at the nonpartisan think tank Pew.
Scholarship and savings account costs have risen quickly
Until five years ago, the boldest school choice programs were limited to
lower-income and special-needs students. More recently, scholarships and
state-funded savings accounts open to most or all families have been
catching on, especially in Republican-controlled states.
This approach costs far more, at least in the short term. That is partly
because studies of the efforts in several states have found most of the
first students to enroll were already attending private schools, and not
receiving taxpayer subsidies at all before the choice programs' launch.
In the coming school year, voucher programs are expected to cost Florida
taxpayers almost $3.9 billion, or about $1 in every $13 from the state’s
general revenue fund. In Arizona, it’s nearly 5% of the general budget.
An analysis by The Associated Press found the costs in Iowa, Ohio and
Oklahoma are over 3% of state general spending this year, or are
projected to be in the coming budget year.
Spending is a smaller portion of the budget in states where the
scholarship programs are still ramping up. Those include Arkansas,
Indiana, North Carolina, Utah and West Virginia.
Scholarships are catching on in more states
A flood of campaign money from voucher proponents has been a key factor
in convincing previously resistant Republican lawmakers to endorse
school choice plans, particularly as advocates have called for more
school options coming out of the COVID pandemic.
Programs were approved last year in Alabama and Louisiana and this year
in Tennessee, where Republican Gov. Bill Lee has said the $447 million
program will be available for the upcoming school year.
A New Hampshire bill raising income limits on an existing program has
been moving through the legislature.
In Texas on Thursday, lawmakers sent the governor a bill that would
allot more than $10,000 per year for students in accredited private
schools. The cost would be capped at $1 billion in the 2026-27 school
year, which is a little over 1% of the annual state general funding. But
by 2030, a legislative analysis found, it could cost $4.5 billion a
year. That could partially be offset by a little over $800 million in
savings, because there would be fewer public school students to
subsidize.
[to top of second column]
|
Students and parents rally at the Ohio Statehouse in support of
possible changes that would increase eligibility for taxpayer-funded
school vouchers to K-12 students statewide, May 17, 2023, in
Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Samantha Hendrickson, file)
The Texas House also approved a nearly $8 billion boost to the
public education system, which advocates say doesn't cover extra
expenses due to inflation.
In energy-dependent North Dakota, GOP Gov. Kelly Armstrong vetoed an
education savings account program, saying it wouldn't expand options
for all students and there were implementation problems. He has
since said the concept remains a priority for him.
Erin Oban, an organizer with North Dakotans for Public Schools, said
the program's costs and unknowns about the state's financial outlook
make it a bad time to start a voucher program.
"I think it would be a very long-term challenge to fund something in
the short term you think might be a good idea or that somehow we can
afford right now,” she said.
Congressional Republicans are looking to extend an assortment of tax
cuts passed in President Donald Trump’s first term, plus enact new
tax cuts for overtime, tips and Social Security benefits. Proponents
of the school choice credit will face stiff competition when it
comes to getting included in that mix.
Vouchers draw more ire when traditional funding lags
In Ohio, under a budget proposed by House Republicans, vouchers
would see a bigger funding increase than public schools starting in
July 2026. The plan, which was passed this month, also calls for a
way for the state to take back some property tax money already
collected by school districts.
Democratic state Rep. Bride Rose Sweeney said she doesn’t have a
problem with vouchers, so long as public schools are fully funded.
But she says the budget plan falls short of that.
It also would continue to increase the amount available for
scholarships to private schools, including for the first time making
a portion of them available to institutions that operate without any
state oversight.
“Ninety percent of Ohio’s kids are still in the public schools,”
Sweeney said. “They are increasing still more into vouchers while
still not giving the public schools what they need — even though
that’s where the bulk of the money is coming from.”
Rachel Brady, a mother of four in Wake Forest, North Carolina, was a
leader in a successful push last year for lawmakers to fully fund
scholarships after one of her children, and thousands of others,
were put on a waiting list after the initial allocation was
exhausted.
Lawmakers should look to cut costs elsewhere if they have to in
order to keep the programs going, she said.
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein — like Arizona's Katie Hobbs, another
Democratic governor — has proposed scaling back the scholarships.
But there is no indication the GOP-controlled legislatures will pump
the brakes in either state.
The budget advanced this month by the North Carolina House includes
scholarship funding and a smaller raise for public school teachers
than Stein proposed.
“This is a great investment in the future of our kids,” Brady said.
“It’s giving them what they need to be successful in life. I can’t
think of a better way to invest in the future of our state.”
___
Associated Press writers Collin Binkley, Jack Dura, Kevin Freking
and Nadia Lathan contributed.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
