| 
		FTC sues LA Fitness operators for 'exceedingly difficult' gym 
		cancellation policies
		[August 21, 2025]  By 
		WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS 
		NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is suing the operators 
		of LA Fitness, over allegations that they make it “exceedingly 
		difficult” for consumers to cancel gym memberships and other related 
		services offered in their clubs nationwide.
 In a Wednesday complaint, the FTC accused Fitness International and its 
		subsidiary Fitness & Sports Clubs of illegally charging consumers 
		“hundreds of millions of dollars in unwanted recurring fees” as a result 
		of cumbersome cancellation processes. The agency said that tens of 
		thousands of customers have reported difficulties with these policies to 
		date.
 
 “The FTC’s complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have 
		experienced — a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,” 
		Christopher Mufarrige, director of the agency’s Bureau of Consumer 
		Protection, said in a statement.
 
 Beyond LA Fitness, California-based Fitness International operates 
		brands like Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club, and Club Studio — 
		spanning across more than 600 locations with over 3.7 million members 
		nationwide. And the FTC pointed to two “unfair and unlawful” 
		cancellation processes that it says these gyms have used for years: 
		in-person cancellation or cancellation by mail.
 
		
		 
		Both of these options require consumers to print out a form on the gym’s 
		website, which includes logging in with credentials that the agency says 
		some customers don’t have or remember. And if a customer opts for 
		in-person cancellation, there’s limited hours and often difficulty 
		finding a manager to process the forms, the complaint notes — while 
		mailing the form comes with additional costs.
 “Each of these cancellation methods is opaque, complicated, and 
		demanding — far from simple,” the FTC writes in its complaint. It also 
		alleges that the company doesn’t adequately disclose cancellation 
		offerings when consumers sign up for memberships, and that some will be 
		signed up for additional services with recurring charges without 
		realizing there may be different cancellation requirements.
 
		According to the FTC, Fitness International now offers website 
		cancellations for subscriptions “with stand-alone agreements” — but the 
		agency said the process “still imposes unnecessary burdens” on customers 
		and claims that that option is buried online. It’s also still not 
		possible to cancel memberships on the company’s mobile apps, the FTC 
		added.
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            A vehicle drives near the side of the building of an LA Fitness gym, 
			on April 19, 2018, in Secaucus, N.J. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File) 
            
			
			
			 Jill Hill, president of club 
			operations at Fitness International, expressed disappointment in the 
			FTC’s decision to pursue litigation — and said that the allegations 
			were “without merit” and that the company was confident that it 
			would prevail in court.
 In a statement, Hill noted that the statute that the FTC relied “was 
			designed to address only online retail transactions, does not 
			require any specific method of cancellation, and has never before 
			been applied to the health club industry.” She added that Fitness 
			International “proactively launched” its online cancellation process 
			18 months before the FTC’s “click to cancel rule” was set to take 
			effect.
 
 “With just a few clicks, members may cancel online — a step we 
			voluntarily implemented well ahead of regulatory deadlines,” Hill 
			said, adding that the company chose to keep this offering in effect 
			“to provide members with yet another simple way to cancel.”
 
 This isn’t the first time that federal regulators have accused gym 
			operators — and other companies with subscription services — of 
			making their cancellation processes too difficult for consumers.
 
 Under the Biden administration, the FTC adopted a “click to cancel” 
			rule, which would have made it easier for consumers to end unwanted 
			subscriptions. But last month, days before that rule was poised to 
			go into effect, a federal appeals court blocked the proposed 
			changes.
 
 In its litigation against Fitness International, the FTC says it’s 
			seeking a court order prohibiting the allegedly unfair conduct and 
			money back for consumers who were harmed by difficult cancellation 
			processes.
 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			 |