Judge rules Utah's congressional map must be redrawn for the 2026
elections
[August 26, 2025]
By HANNAH SCHOENBAUM
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — The Utah Legislature will need to rapidly redraw
the state’s congressional boundaries after a judge ruled Monday that the
Republican-controlled body circumvented safeguards put in place by
voters to ensure districts aren’t drawn to favor any party.
The current map, adopted in 2021, divides Salt Lake County — Utah's
population center and a Democratic stronghold — among the state’s four
congressional districts, all of which have since elected Republicans by
wide margins.
District Court Judge Dianna Gibson made few judgments on the content of
the map but declared it unlawful because lawmakers had weakened and
ignored an independent commission established by voters to prevent
partisan gerrymandering.
"The nature of the violation lies in the Legislature’s refusal to
respect the people’s exercise of their constitutional lawmaking power
and to honor the people’s right to reform their government,” Gibson said
in the ruling.

New maps will need to be drawn quickly, before candidates start filing
in early January for the 2026 midterm elections. The ruling gives
lawmakers a deadline of Sept. 24 and allows voting rights groups
involved in the legal challenge to submit alternate proposals to the
court.
But appeals expected from Republican officials could help them run out
the clock to possibly delay adopting new maps until 2028.
Redistricting battle could shift the balance in Congress
The ruling creates uncertainty in a state that was thought to be a clean
sweep for the GOP as the party is preparing to defend its slim majority
in the U.S. House. Nationally, Democrats need to net three seats next
year to take control of the chamber. The sitting president’s party tends
to lose seats in the midterms, as was the case for President Donald
Trump in 2018.
Trump has urged several Republican-led states to add winnable seats for
the GOP. In Texas, a plan awaiting Gov. Greg Abbott’s approval includes
five new districts that would favor Republicans. Ohio Republicans
already were scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan,
and Indiana, Florida and Missouri may choose to make changes. Some
Democrat-led states say they may enter the redistricting arms race, but
so far only California has taken action to offset GOP gains in Texas.
The U.S. Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene, and the Utah Supreme
Court may be hesitant to entertain an appeal of Monday’s ruling after it
had sent the case back to Gibson for her to decide.
The nation’s high court in 2019 ruled that claims of partisan
gerrymandering for congressional and legislative districts are outside
the purview of federal courts and should be decided by states.
Voting rights groups celebrate legal victory
David Reymann, an attorney for the voting rights advocates who
challenged the map, called the ruling a “watershed moment” for the
voices of Utah voters.
“The Legislature in this state is not king,” Reymann told reporters
Monday evening.
Leaders from the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee applauded the ruling as a victory for
democracy.

[to top of second column]
|

Republican Gov. Spencer Cox said he disagrees with the decision but
holds respect for Utah's judiciary. Meanwhile, the state’s GOP
Chairman, Robert Axson, dismissed the ruling as “judicial activism.”
Utah's Republican legislative leaders, Senate President Stuart Adams
and House Speaker Mike Schultz, said in a joint statement that they
are disappointed by the ruling and are carefully considering their
next steps.
In 2018, voters narrowly approved a ballot initiative that created
an independent redistricting commission to draw boundaries for
Utah’s legislative and congressional districts, which the
Legislature was required to consider. Lawmakers repealed the
initiative in 2020 and replaced it with a law that transformed the
commission into an advisory board that they could choose to ignore.
The following year, lawmakers disregarded a congressional map
proposal from the commission and drew one of their own that carved
up Salt Lake County among four reliably Republican districts.
Voting rights advocates sued, arguing the map drawn by lawmakers
constituted partisan gerrymandering that favored Republicans. They
also said the Legislature violated the rights of voters when it
repealed and replaced the 2018 initiative.
The case made its way to the Utah Supreme Court, which ruled that
the Legislature cannot change laws approved through ballot
initiatives except to reinforce them, or to advance a compelling
government interest. The five-member panel sent the case back to
Gibson in the lower court to decide whether lawmakers would have to
redraw boundaries set as part of a redistricting process that
happens every 10 years.
Lawmakers and voters clash over redistricting
The ruling Monday reinstates the voter-approved redistricting
standards that lawmakers had overturned.

Utah was one of four states where voters approved measures designed
to reduce partisan gerrymandering in 2018. As in Utah, Missouri’s
Republican-led Legislature quickly sought to repeal key provisions.
Missouri voters approved the Legislature’s revisions in 2020, before
the original plan was ever used. Independent commissions approved by
Colorado and Michigan voters remained in place and were used after
the 2020 census.
The redistricting measures aren’t the only instances where state
lawmakers have altered voter-approved measures.
Earlier this year, Missouri lawmakers repealed a paid sick leave law
passed by voters and referred a proposed repeal of an abortion
rights amendment to the ballot. In South Dakota, voters approved a
public campaign finance system, tightened lobbying laws and created
an ethics commission in 2016. Lawmakers repealed and replaced the
measure the next year with a narrower government watchdog board and
looser limits on lobbyist gifts to public officials.
___
Associated Press writer David Lieb contributed from Jefferson City,
Missouri.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |