Katy Perry testifies that she's seeking 'justice' at trial over $15
million mansion
[August 27, 2025]
By ANDREW DALTON
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A lawyer asked Katy Perry on Tuesday whether she
stood to gain money or anything else from a trial in a long legal fight
over a California mansion.
“Justice” was the one-word answer from the singing superstar, former
“American Idol” judge and recent astronaut, part of an hour of remote
testimony she gave in a Los Angeles courtroom.
In her tense, careful testimony, Perry wouldn't concede directly that
she stood to gain money if she won, but did say, “I stand to lose money
if it doesn’t work in my favor.”
She spoke during the second trial in a dispute over a $15 million
mansion in upscale Montecito near Santa Barbara that she and former
partner Orlando Bloom bought in 2020.
The seller, 85-year-old Carl Westcott, said he was not mentally
competent to make the deal and sued to undo it.
Perry's side — technically the defendant was her business manager,
Bernie Gudvi — prevailed in the first trial in 2023. Then Gudvi,
representing Perry, countersued over lost rental income brought on by
the legal fight and millions in maintenance the house allegedly
required. That brought on the current sequel trial.
Westcott's lawyer, Andrew J. Thomas, often tried to steer the
conversation toward Bloom. Superior Court Judge Joseph Lipner ruled that
the “Pirates of the Caribbean” and “Lord of the Rings” actor does not
have to testify because it would be redundant and unnecessary, even
though the house is officially owned by a company he set up.
Asked if she had any role in a remodel of the house Bloom oversaw, Perry
replied that she acted as “partner and adviser.”
The couple, who split up in July, have a daughter together whose fifth
birthday was Tuesday.
When asked about the nature of their partnership, Perry replied, “We're
family for life.”
Perry's attorney, Eric Rowen, objected to nearly every question by
Thomas as irrelevant, including most of the queries about Bloom, which
Lipner kept to a minimum.
Rowen objected especially angrily when Perry was asked if she knew that
Westcott had entered a mental institution earlier in the legal fight,
apparently suggesting the question was an attack for the sake of the
media present.
“This is, I don’t want to say unethical, but this is simply an effort to
drive a narrative to parties outside this courtroom," Rowen said. The
judge sustained his objection and the question was not allowed.
[to top of second column]
|
Katy Perry arrives at the 11th Breakthrough Prize Ceremony on April
5, 2025, in Los Angeles. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP, File)
 The judge and lawyers referred to
Perry as “Miss Hudson.” Her legal name is Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson.
She's currently in the middle of an international tour, and has
recently been tied to former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
It wasn't clear where she was during Tuesday's questioning.
Thomas asked Perry repeatedly whether she had had enough cash on
hand to buy the $15 million mansion outright.
“I could have," she eventually said, "but I wanted to do a mortgage
instead.”
Perry conceded that in the previous trial, she said she intended to
live in the mansion, not to rent it out. But renters including the
family of actor Chris Pratt are central to this trial. There was
discussion of having Pratt testify, but he was not on the final
witness list.
There was one light moment at the end of Perry's testimony when she
described some dealings with Westcott and said, “I was pregnant at
the time.”
She couldn't be heard clearly and Lipner said he had heard, “It was
private.”
“No, pregnant!” Perry said with a laugh.
Perry's own lawyer declined to cross-examine her and the judge
excused her.
Like the previous trial, this one has no jury, and Lipner will
decide the outcome. Perry's testimony came on the fourth day of
proceedings that are expected to go on for two more days.
It's not the first long public fight Perry has had over a property.
She previously sparred in court with an order of nuns who fought to
stop the sale of a convent she had bought. She prevailed in that
case.
She also testified in a lawsuit that alleged she and her co-writers
had stolen key elements of her hit song “Dark Horse” from a
Christian musician. She lost at trial, but won on appeal.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
