Federal judge to hear arguments in suit aiming to stop Trump's
birthright citizenship order
Send a link to a friend
[February 05, 2025]
By MICHAEL KUNZELMAN and MIKE CATALINI
GREENBELT, Md. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday is set to hear
arguments over temporarily pausing President Donald Trump's executive
order seeking to end birthright citizenship for anyone born in the U.S.
to someone in the country illegally.
Trump's inauguration week order is currently on temporary hold
nationally because of a separate suit brought by four states in
Washington state, where a judge called the order “blatantly
unconstitutional." In total, 22 states, as well as other organizations,
have sued to try to stop the executive action.
U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman is set to hear arguments in
Maryland federal court. Bringing the suit before Boardman are
immigrant-rights advocacy groups CASA and Asylum Seeker Advocacy
Project, and a handful of expectant mothers.
At the heart of the lawsuits is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution,
ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the Dred Scott Supreme Court
decision that determined Scott, a slave, wasn't a citizen.
“The principle of birthright citizenship is a foundation of our national
democracy, is woven throughout the laws of our nation, and has shaped a
shared sense of national belonging for generation after generation of
citizens,” the plaintiffs argue in the suit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f57d/0f57d9fd4eb5d3294dabaad16fd484c181ba37e9" alt=""
The Trump administration asserts that children of noncitizens are not
“subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not
entitled to citizenship.
“The Constitution does not harbor a windfall clause granting American
citizenship to, inter alia: the children of those who have circumvented
(or outright defied) federal immigration laws,” the government argued in
reply to the Maryland plaintiffs' suit.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483ae/483ae45c8a09fa53e607b96551204d540ef43dc0" alt=""
In this Sept. 16, 2015, photo, a woman in Sullivan City,
Texas, who said she entered the country illegally, walks with her
daughter who was born in the United States, but was denied a birth
certificate. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20649/206492e7746b544d286e8566e1fe76940802a811" alt=""
The 14th Amendment was added in the aftermath of the Civil War to
ensure citizenship for former slaves and free African Americans. It
states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside.”
In addition to the 22 states with Democratic attorneys general
seeking to stop the order, 18 Republican attorneys general announced
this week that they're seeking to defend the president's order by
joining one of the federal suits brought in New Hampshire.
The U.S. is among about 30 countries where birthright citizenship —
the principle of jus soli or “right of the soil” — is applied. Most
are in the Americas, and Canada and Mexico are among them.
During his first week in office, Trump signed 10 executive orders on
immigration and issued edicts to carry out promises of mass
deportations and border security.
Some actions were felt immediately. Others face legal challenges. If
they happen at all, other orders may take years to happen but have
led to fear in immigrant communities.
Whether Trump can enact his agenda could come down to money.
Congress is expected to consider funding support soon. Trump may use
emergency powers to tap the Defense Department, as he did for a
border wall during his first term.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |