Amazon's Whole Foods asks agency to set aside the results of a union win
at a Philadelphia store
Send a link to a friend
[February 06, 2025] By
HALELUYA HADERO
Amazon-owned Whole Foods is asking the National Labor Relations Board to
set aside the results of a union election in which the first group of
the company’s employees voted in favor of collective bargaining.
In a filing submitted to the agency this week, attorneys for Whole Foods
Market argued the union involved with the election, held last week at a
store in Philadelphia, interfered in the process by promising employees
a 30% wage increase if they unionized and providing free transportation
to them the day of the vote.
The company also accused The United Food and Commercial Workers
International Union – which worked to unionize workers through a local
chapter – of intimidating employees who supported Whole Foods. The
company did not provide specific details on its allegations, which the
union disputes.
Pro-union workers prevailed last week after 130 employees in the store –
or about 57% of the ballots cast – voted in favor of organizing. The
election results still need be certified by a regional director of the
NLRB, which Whole Foods says can't lawfully be done since the agency
currently does not have a third board member in Washington. Gynne A.
Wilcox, one of the agency's board members, was fired last week by the
Trump administration.
In a statement, UFCW Local 1776, the local union that pulled off the
labor win, called the company’s allegations baseless. It also said the
objections filed by Whole Foods was a legal maneuvering done to delay
the bargaining process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b464a/b464a0714a53a492827fd7fc89ceebab58593061" alt=""
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec3ae/ec3ae8b677862c0a0371485c020a78a616e2fce7" alt=""
A Whole Foods Market grocery store is in the Harlem neighborhood of
New York City on March 3, 2023. (AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey, file)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8748/d8748d23f38244d7747025773e554b0f23e9f447" alt="" “We fully expected Whole Foods to
try to stall this process," said Wendell Young IV, the president of
the local union. "Amazon has a well-documented history of using
baseless objections to undermine the rights of workers seeking
representation, and this case is no different.”
In its objection to the election, the upscale grocery chain also
accused the NLRB of tainting the process by restraining the company
from communicating its views on unionization to employees through
required meetings held during work hours.
In November, the agency’s board had issued a decision that found
these meetings – commonly known as captive audience meetings – were
unlawful because they forced employees to attend gatherings that
they may otherwise choose to skip. Companies typically use these
meetings to deter employees from unionizing.
The board said employers may still hold meetings about unions for
their workers. But they must make attendance voluntary with no
adverse consequences for employees who fail to show up.
The union election in Philadelphia marked the first successful entry
of organized labor into Amazon’s grocery business, which includes
Whole Foods, Amazon Fresh and the Amazon Go convenience stores.
Amazon, which purchased Whole Foods in 2017 for $13.7 billion, has
tried to fend off organizing efforts by delivery drivers and
warehouse workers.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |