Trump once again slaps taxes on foreign steel, aluminum, a move that
proved costly in his first term
Send a link to a friend
[February 11, 2025] By
PAUL WISEMAN
WASHINGTON (AP) —
President Donald Trump is hitting foreign steel and aluminum with a 25%
tax. If that sounds familiar, it’s because he did pretty much the same
thing during his first term.
Trump’s original metals tariffs gave America’s struggling steel and
aluminum producers some relief from intense global competition, allowing
them to charge higher prices. In anticipation of the new tariffs, shares
of steel and aluminum producers climbed Monday. Nucor rose 5.6%,
Cleveland-Cliffs jumped 17.9% and Alcoa ticked up 2.2%.
But the tariffs took a toll last time, too, damaging U.S. relations with
key allies and driving up costs for “downstream’’ U.S. producers that
buy steel and aluminum and use them to manufacture goods.
Timothy Zimmerman is CEO of one of those downstream companies: Mitchell
Metal Products in Merrill, Wisconsin. And he still has bad memories of
those times.
“We were significantly impacted,’’ he said. “The challenges we faced
were unprecedented -- rapid inflationary impacts from domestic steel
producers. We saw steel prices rise within a few months about 70% over
what they had been ... Our (steel) suppliers simply broke contracts and
gave us an option: Take this or take nothing.’’
But Mitchell Metal Products was locked into contracts with its own
customers — a wide range of businesses from furniture makers to
telecommunications firms -- that didn’t allow it to pass along all or
part of the higher cost. His company’s profit margins were squeezed, and
it ended up losing business to European rivals that didn’t have to
contend with the fallout from Trump’s steel tariffs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f5bc/3f5bc4c1a24e7437375337206ac4a7508f0ffc23" alt=""
The overall economic impact on the United States was limited then – and
is likely to be limited again -- because steel and aluminum imports
amount to barely a ripple in the almost $30 trillion U.S. economy.
Still, the new taxes on foreign steel and aluminum and Trump’s other
import tax plans – including his promise to raise American tariffs to
match those charged by other countries -- are likely “to boost U.S.
inflation and weigh on global growth this year,’’ Jennifer McKeown and
Hamad Hussain of Capital Economics wrote Monday.
Tariffs would hit American allies — again
The steel and aluminum tariffs would hit U.S. allies. Canada is the No.
1 supplier of foreign steel and aluminum to the United States. Mexico is
the No. 3 steel supplier, and Japan and South Korea are also major steel
exporters to the U.S.
China is widely seen as source of the world steel industry’s problems.
Chinese overproduction has flooded the world with steel and kept prices
low, hurting steelmakers in the United States and elsewhere. But the
U.S. already uses trade barriers to keep out all but a trickle of
Chinese steel. China accounted for less than 2% of U.S. steel imports
last year, making it the No. 10 supplier of steel to the U.S., according
to the American Iron and Steel Institute, a trade group.
In slapping duties on steel and aluminum nearly seven years ago, Trump
reached into the federal government’s tariff toolkit and pulled out
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Section 232 gives the
president the power to impose tariffs on other countries national
security grounds.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28e63/28e63edb6b66a9c0b2fa87a1f75dbfc66475d9c6" alt=""
A mural depicting steel workers stands at the Stelco steel
production facility in Hamilton, Ontario, on Monday, Feb. 10, 2025.
(Nick Iwanyshyn/The Canadian Press via AP)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20b5e/20b5e731c6d9113acd064161e9bc7d565f779e5d" alt="" The 2018 tariffs — 25% on steel and
10% on aluminum — provoked outrage in Canada and Mexico, U.S.
neighbors and allies that resented being hit with trade sanctions
and labeled as threats to U.S. national security.
The steel and aluminum tariffs also drew retaliation as U.S. trading
partners hit back with taxes on U.S. exports from Kentucky bourbon
to Levi’s jeans.
Trump's first-term tariffs proved costly
By making foreign steel costlier, the tariffs allowed U.S.
steelmakers to raise prices and encouraged them to keep mills
running and to invest in new capacity.
But the tariffs hammered downstream businesses like Zimmerman’s that
had to pay the higher prices. In 2021, production at downstream
companies dropped by nearly $3.5 billion because of the tariffs,
canceling out the $2.3 billion uptick in production that year by
aluminum producers and steelmakers, according to a 2023 study by the
U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent federal agency
that investigates trade disputes.
In 2020, researchers from Harvard University and the University of
California, Davis, found that the tariffs created 1,000 jobs – but
reduced employment elsewhere by 75,000. When the tariffs hit seven
years ago, Mitchell Metal Products employed a peak of 102 workers.
It had to cut its payrolls by leaving openings unfilled and weeding
out some workers. The company now employs about 75 people.
Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for
International Economics, said that Trump’s first-term trade wars,
including his tariffs on most Chinese imports, were costly to
American industry.
“The net effect of all these tariffs at that time — on China,
aluminum, steel, plus retaliation — was to reduce U.S. manufacturing
unemployment,’’ he said. “I’m expecting the same thing this time
around.’’
The 2018 metals tariffs were partially eased. For some countries,
they were dropped. For some, they were replaced with import quotas.
On Monday, Trump removed all exceptions and exemptions on the
original tariffs and upped the levy on aluminum from 10% to 25%.
Zimmerman is bracing for the new tariffs to hit. “Already last week
several large (steel) mills operating in the United States announced
price increases in anticipation of the tariffs, not due to increased
demand,’’ he said. “I think the domestic producers will work to do
the same thing, or very close to the same thing, as what happened in
2018.’’
This time, he said, Mitchell Metal Products will seek to be more
pro-active in getting its customers to absorb some of the higher
costs. Otherwise, he said, “It’s not a healthy place to be as a
company.’’
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73231/732313521431c22379a63243b3f1a25e01865df2" alt="" |