Fourth federal judge blocks Trump’s birthright citizenship order
Send a link to a friend
[February 14, 2025]
By MICHAEL CASEY and MIKE CATALINI
BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston on Thursday blocked an executive
order from President Donald Trump that would end birthright citizenship
for the children of parents who are in the U.S. illegally, becoming the
fourth judge to do so.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin came three days after
U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante in New Hampshire blocked the
executive order and follows similar rulings in Seattle and Maryland.
Sorokin said in a 31-page ruling that the “Constitution confers
birthright citizenship broadly, including to persons within the
categories described” in the president’s executive order.
The Boston case was filed by the Democratic attorneys general of 18
states and is one of at least 10 lawsuits challenging the birthright
citizenship order.
“President Trump may believe that he is above the law, but today’s
preliminary injunction sends a clear message: He is not a king, and he
cannot rewrite the Constitution with the stroke of a pen," the attorneys
general said in a statement.
In the case filed by four states in Seattle, U.S. District Judge John C.
Coughenour said the Trump administration was attempting to ignore the
Constitution, with the president trying to change it with an executive
order.
A federal judge in Maryland issued a nationwide pause on the order in a
separate but similar case involving immigrants rights groups and
pregnant women whose soon-to-be-born children could be affected. The
Trump administration said Tuesday that it would appeal that ruling to
the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d06/00d0689d4838aea0af01d56fd1d74549ad9da4ca" alt=""
In the Boston case, the attorneys general from 18 states, along with the
cities of San Francisco and Washington, D.C., asked Sorokin to issue a
preliminary injunction. That means the injunction will likely remain in
place while the lawsuit plays out.
They argue that the principle of birthright citizenship is “enshrined in
the Constitution,” and that Trump does not have the authority to issue
the order, which they called a “flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip
hundreds of thousands of American-born children of their citizenship
based on their parentage.”
They also argue that Trump’s order would cost states funding they rely
on to “provide essential services” — from foster care to health care for
low-income children, to “early interventions for infants, toddlers, and
students with disabilities.”
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60ff3/60ff301588454745e8cfc4155972c93411869744" alt=""
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright
citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington,
Jan. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eda9/5eda97e94b26ecae705b010d913538134cea2e3d" alt=""
One of the newest lawsuits was filed Thursday in the Southern District
of New York, brought by the New York Immigration Coalition and a
31-year-old pregnant Venezuelan national who has a pending petition for
asylum. They say the ban discriminates against people based on their
national origin and alien status, and that it will render the woman's
child “a stateless nomad without a home country.”
At the heart of the lawsuits is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution,
which was ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the Dred Scott
Supreme Court decision. That decision found that Scott, an enslaved man,
wasn’t a citizen despite having lived in a state where slavery was
outlawed.
The Trump administration has asserted that children of noncitizens are
not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not
entitled to citizenship.
Attorneys for the states argue that it does and that it has been
recognized since the amendment’s adoption, notably in an 1898 U.S.
Supreme Court decision. That decision, United States v. Wong Kim Ark,
held that the only children who did not automatically receive U.S.
citizenship upon being born on U.S. soil were the children of diplomats,
who have allegiance to another government; enemies present in the U.S.
during hostile occupation; those born on foreign ships; and those born
to members of sovereign Native American tribes.
The U.S. is among about 30 countries where birthright citizenship — the
principle of jus soli or “right of the soil” — is applied. Most are in
the Americas, and Canada and Mexico are among them.
Sorokin's order applies to another similar case brought in Boston as
well by Lawyers for Civil Rights on behalf of expectant mothers whose
children would be affected by the president's executive order.
___
Catalini contributed from Trenton, New Jersey.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |