Treasury watchdog begins audit of Musk DOGE team's access to the US
government's payment system
Send a link to a friend
[February 15, 2025]
By FATIMA HUSSEIN and JOSH BOAK
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Treasury Department's Office of Inspector General
on Friday said it was launching an audit of the security controls for
the federal government's payment system, as Democratic lawmakers raised
red flags about the access provided to Trump aide Elon Musk's Department
of Government Efficiency team.
The audit will also review the past two years of the system's
transactions as it relates to Musk's assertion of “alleged fraudulent
payments,” according to a letter from Loren J. Sciurba, Treasury’s
deputy inspector general, that was obtained by The Associated Press.
The audit marks part of the broader effort led by Democratic lawmakers
and federal employee unions to provide transparency and accountability
about DOGE's activities under President Donald Trump's Republican
administration. The Musk team has pushed for access to the government's
computer systems and sought to remove tens of thousands of federal
workers.
“We expect to begin our fieldwork immediately,” Sciurba wrote. “Given
the breadth of this effort, the audit will likely not be completed until
August; however, we recognize the danger that improper access or
inadequate controls can pose to the integrity of sensitive payment
systems. As such, if critical issues come to light before that time, we
will issue interim updates and reports.”
Treasury's inspector general began the audit before Democratic lawmakers
asked for it. A. J. Altemus, acting counsel to the inspector general,
said “our work is independently initiated” and standards dictate that
the audit “must be non-partisan and objective. These standards remain
unchanged.”
Tech billionaire Musk, who continues to control Tesla, X and SpaceX
among other companies, claims to be finding waste, fraud and abuse while
providing savings to taxpayers. Many of his claims are so far
unsubstantiated. But there is a risk that his team's aggressive efforts
could lead to the failure of government computer systems and enable Musk
and his partners to profit off private information maintained by the
government.
The audit would overlap with increased pressure that the Trump
administration is placing on inspectors general, presidential appointees
who are supposed to serve as an independent check against mismanagement
and abuse of government power. In January, the administration fired
several independent inspectors general at government agencies, a move
that some members of Congress said violated federal oversight laws. The
firings prompted a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in federal court in
Washington that seeks to return the inspectors general to their jobs.
Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Ron Wyden of
Oregon led the push in the Senate for the inspector general office's
inquiry at the Treasury.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e9ff/9e9ff4adfc1d5a4fbcaffec2338b61033256d06d" alt=""
On Wednesday, Warren, Wyden and Sen. Jack Reed, D-Rhode Island, sent a
letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noting the inconsistencies in
the accounts provided by his department about DOGE.
“Your lack of candor about these events is deeply troubling given the
threats to the economy and the public from DOGE’s meddling, and you need
to provide a clear, complete, and public accounting of who accessed the
systems, what they were doing, and why they were doing it,” the
Democratic lawmakers wrote in their letter.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5908/b5908dfbb096a2e6a6b89d3e2e82ad00e105a375" alt=""
People listen to speakers during a rally against Elon Musk outside
the Treasury Department in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2025. (AP
Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe88a/fe88ac75b2e438fbbac77a147464f13b2adeb953" alt=""
Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
also called on inspectors general to investigate DOGE and welcomed
the Treasury audit.
“Elon Musk and DOGE can't be allowed to creep on Americans’ most
sensitive data as they operate in the shadows," said Rep. Gerry
Connolly, D-Va., the committee's ranking member. “This is an
important step, and inspectors general must be free to pursue their
investigations without interference.”
The Treasury Department provided conflicting information about
DOGE's access to the payment system. Initially, it claimed the
access was read only, only to then acknowledge that a DOGE team
member briefly had the ability to edit code, and then to say in an
employee-sworn statement that the ability to edit was granted by
accident.
The 25-year-old employee granted the access, Marko Elez, resigned
this month after racist posts were discovered on one of his social
media accounts, only for Musk to call for his rehiring with the
backing of Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
Earlier this week, the Treasury declined to brief a pair of the
highest-ranking lawmakers on the Senate Finance Committee, including
Wyden, on the controversy related to DOGE’s use of Treasury payment
systems, citing ongoing litigation.
Advocacy groups and labor unions have filed lawsuits over DOGE’s
potentially unauthorized access to sensitive Treasury payment
systems. Five former treasury secretaries have sounded the alarm on
the risks associated with Musk’s DOGE access.
A federal judge in Manhattan on Friday heard arguments in a lawsuit
brought by Democratic state attorneys general seeking to prevent
DOGE from accessing Treasury Department data.
Judge Jeannette Vargas said she’d issue a decision at a later date
and a temporary restraining order imposed by a prior judge would
remain in place until then.
Lawyers for the federal government argued that Treasury and DOGE
staffers were acting appropriately.
“There was nothing unlawful about Treasury carrying out the
priorities of a new administration using Treasury employees,” said
Jeffrey Oestericher, of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern
District of New York. “They were perfectly within their lawful
duties.”
But Vargas at times pushed back at the federal government’s
arguments that adequate protections were in place, noting that the
plans were set in motion only in a matter of weeks. “Why so rushed?”
she asked.
Lawyers for the Democratic attorneys general argued there was no
effort to remove or redact private individual information and no
evidence that DOGE staff were given proper training on how to handle
such sensitive data.
“States have had their bank account information accessed by people
with no reason to access it,” said Andrew Amer of the New York
attorney general’s office.
___
Associated Press writer Philip Marcelo in New York contributed to
this report.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |