Judge to rule swiftly on effort to block DOGE from assessing data and
firing federal employees
Send a link to a friend
[February 18, 2025]
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday questioned the
authority of billionaire Elon Musk and his Department of Government
Efficiency but was skeptical of a request to block DOGE from accessing
sensitive data and firing employees at half a dozen federal agencies.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan held a hearing on a request from 14
states for a temporary restraining order seeking to curtail Musk's power
in President Donald Trump's quest to downsize the federal government.
Chutkan said she would rule within 24 hours.
Trump appointed Musk to lead DOGE in a push to slash the federal
workforce and reduce or end disfavored programs. The administration
dismissed probationary employees and Trump in an executive order told
agency leaders to plan for “large-scale reductions.”
Democratic attorneys general from 14 states had filed a lawsuit
challenging what they called Musk's “unchecked power.” The states are
seeking to block DOGE from firing employees and accessing data at the
federal Office of Personnel Management along with six federal agencies
that oversee health and human services, education, energy,
transportation, labor, and commerce.
During the hourlong hearing held over Zoom, Chutkan said she didn't
think the states had shown necessary evidence of imminent harm to merit
court intervention at this stage.
The attorneys general argued that Musk's actions at the helm of DOGE can
only be taken by a nominated and Senate-confirmed official under the
Constitution. They also said citizens have concerns about the secure
handling of sensitive information. The federal government countered that
DOGE is acting in an advisory role, they don’t need Senate confirmation
to access data, and that the states hadn’t shown Musk’s hunt for waste
and fraud had harmed them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e7f/b4e7f238df528836ae21868ba1791721e000e7b6" alt=""
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7851/e78515074441a3e5db475f72908ba38c1ec9f04f" alt=""
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump, left,
claps as Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk prepares to depart after
speaking at a campaign event at the Butler Farm Show, on Oct. 5,
2024, in Butler, Pa. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5046a/5046acb2626bc921fc02f8cb840186788da8b266" alt=""
“Nowhere have my friends offered a shred of anything, nor could
they, to show that Elon Musk has any formal or actual authority to
make any government decision himself,” Justice Department lawyer
Harry Graver said.
The judge appeared to question that assertion.
“I think you stretch too far. I disagree with you there,” Chutkan
replied but added that was what the merits of the case were about.
While Chutkan seemed skeptical if a temporary restraining order was
merited, she seemed sympathetic to some of the states’ claims
“One of the challenges in plaintiff’s motion is that this is
essentially a private citizen directing an organization that’s not a
federal agency to have access to the entire workings of the federal
government, fire, hire, slash, contract, terminate programs all
without apparently any congressional oversight,” the judge said in
describing the states' claim.
She noted that DOGE doesn’t seem to be moving in any kind of orderly
or predictable fashion, making it difficult for states to know what
is coming next. Chutkan asked for the Justice Department to submit
information about past and upcoming employment terminations.
“DOGE’s actions in this arena have been very unpredictable and
scattershot, and I have no idea whether that is by design or simply
by virtue of the scope of their remit,” Chutkan said.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |