The USAID shutdown is upending livelihoods for nonprofit workers, 
		farmers and other Americans
						
		 
		
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [February 19, 2025]  By 
		ELLEN KNICKMEYER and HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH 
						
		WASHINGTON (AP) — There's the executive in a U.S. supply-chain company 
		whose voice breaks while facing the next round of calls telling 
		employees they no longer have jobs. 
		 
		And a farmer in Missouri who grew up knowing that a world with more 
		hungry people is a world that’s more dangerous. 
		 
		And a Maryland-based philanthropy, founded by Jews who fled pogroms in 
		Eastern Europe, is shutting down much of its more than 120-year-old 
		mission. 
		 
		Beyond the impact of the Trump administration’s dismantling of the U.S. 
		Agency for International Development, some 14,000 agency employees and 
		foreign contractors as well as hundreds of thousands of people receiving 
		aid abroad — many American businesses, farms and nonprofits— say the 
		cutoff of U.S. money they are owed has left them struggling to pay 
		workers and cover bills. Some face financial collapse. 
		 
		U.S. organizations do billions of dollars of business with USAID and the 
		State Department, which oversee more than $60 billion in foreign 
		assistance. More than 80% of companies that have contracts with USAID 
		are American, according to aid data company DevelopmentAid. 
						
		  
						
		President Donald Trump stopped payment nearly overnight in a Jan. 20 
		executive order freezing foreign assistance. The Trump administration 
		accused USAID's programs of being wasteful and promoting a liberal 
		agenda. 
		 
		USAID Stop-Work, a group tracking the impact, says USAID contractors 
		have reported that they laid off nearly 13,000 American workers. The 
		group estimates that the actual total is more than four times that. 
		 
		Here are stories of some Americans whose livelihoods have been upended: 
		 
		Crop innovation work facing closures 
		 
		At the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, a lab that works with 
		processers, food manufacturers and seed and fertilizer companies to 
		expand soybean usage in 31 countries, is set to close in April unless it 
		gets a last-minute reprieve. 
		 
		Peter Goldsmith, director and principal investigator at the Soybean 
		Innovation Lab, said the group has helped open international markets to 
		U.S. farmers and made the crop more prevalent in Africa. 
		 
		For Goldsmith, that kind of steady partnership built on trade and U.S. 
		foreign aid offers the best way to wield U.S. influence, he said. 
		 
		Goldsmith said innovation labs at other land grant universities also are 
		closing. Without them, Goldsmith worries about what will happen in the 
		countries where they worked — what other actors may step in, or whether 
		conflict will result. 
		 
		“It’s a vacuum," he said. "And what will fill that vacuum? It will be 
		filled. There’s no doubt about it.” 
		 
		A refugee mission is imperiled 
		 
		For nonprofits working to stabilize populations and economies abroad, 
		the United States was not only the biggest humanitarian donor but an 
		inextricable part of the whole machinery of development and humanitarian 
		work. 
		 
		Among them, HIAS, a Jewish group aiding refugees and potential refugees, 
		is having to shut down “almost all” of its more than 120-year-old 
		mission. 
		 
		The Maryland-based philanthropy was founded by Jews fleeing persecution 
		in Eastern Europe. Its mission in recent decades has broadened to 
		include keeping vulnerable people safe in their home country so they 
		don’t have to flee, said HIAS President Mark Hetfield. 
						
		
		  
						
		Hetfield said the first Trump administration saw the wisdom of that 
		effort. Hias experienced some of its biggest growth during Trump’s first 
		term as a result. 
		 
		But now, Trump’s shutdown of foreign assistance severed 60% of HIAS's 
		funding, overnight. The group immediately started furloughs among its 
		2,000 direct employees, operating in 17 states and 20 countries. 
		 
		The administration calls it a "suspension,” rather than a termination, 
		Hetfield said. “But we have to stop paying our leases, stop paying our 
		employees.” 
		 
		“It’s not a suspension,” Hetfield said. “That’s a lie.” 
		 
		Tracking USAID's effectiveness may fall by the wayside 
		 
		Keith Ives, a Marine veteran who fell in love with data, has a small 
		Denver-area nonprofit that brought a numbers-crunching relentlessness to 
		his USAID-funded mission of testing the effectiveness of the agency's 
		programs. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            Dr. Brian Diers works with soybean plants at the Soybean Innovation 
			Lab, Thursday, Feb. 13, 2025, in Champaign, Ill. (AP Photo/Craig 
			Pessman) 
            
			
			
			  For Ives' teams, that's included 
			weighing and measuring children in Ethiopia who are getting USAID 
			support, testing whether they're chunkier and taller than kids who 
			aren't. (On average they are.) 
			 
			Last week, Ives was planning to tell half his full-time staff of 28 
			that they would be out of a job at the end of the month. Ives' 
			Causal Design nonprofit gets 70% of its work from USAID. 
			 
			At first, “it was an obsession over how can I fix this,” said Ives, 
			who described his anxiety in the first days of the cutoff as almost 
			paralyzing. “There must be a magic formula. ... I'm just not 
			thinking hard enough, right?'' 
			 
			Now, Ives goes through all-staff call after call, breaking bad news 
			on the impact of USAID's shutdown. Being transparent with them, it 
			turned out, was the best he could do. 
			 
			He looks at the U.S. breaking partnerships and contracts in what had 
			been USAID's six-decade aim of boosting national security by 
			building alliances and crowding out adversaries. 
			 
			For the U.S. now, “I think for years to come, when we try to flex, I 
			think people are going to go, ‘Yeah, but like, remember 2025?'" Ives 
			said. “'You could just be gone tomorrow.'” 
			 
			A supplier faces ruin 
			 
			It takes expertise, cash flow and hundreds of staff to get USAID-funded 
			food and goods to remote and often ill-regulated places around the 
			globe. 
			 
			For U.S. companies doing that, the administration's only follow-up 
			to the stop-work orders it sent out after the money freeze have been 
			termination notices — telling them some contracts are not only 
			paused, but ended. 
			 
			Almost all of those companies have been kept silent publicly, for 
			fear of drawing the wrath of the Trump administration or endangering 
			any court challenges. 
			 
			Speaking anonymously for those reasons, an executive of one 
			supply-chain business that delivers everything from hulking 
			equipment to food describes the financial ruin facing those 
			companies. 
			 
			While describing the next round of layoff calls to be made, the 
			executive, who is letting hundreds of workers go in total, sobs. 
			
			
			  
			Farmers may lose market share 
			 
			Tom Waters, a seventh-generation farmer who grows corn, soybean and 
			wheat near Orrick, Missouri, thinks about his grandfather when he 
			reads about what is happening with USAID. 
			 
			“I’ve heard him say a hundred times, ’People get hungry, they’ll 
			fight,'" Waters said. 
			 
			Feeding people abroad is how the American farmer stabilizes things 
			across the world, he says. “Because we’re helping them keep people’s 
			bellies full.” 
			 
			USAID-run food programs have been a dependable customer for U.S. 
			farmers since the Kennedy administration. Legislation mandates U.S. 
			shippers get a share of the business as well. 
			 
			Even so, American farm sales for USAID humanitarian programs are a 
			fraction of overall U.S. farm exports. And politically, U.S. farmers 
			know that Trump has always taken care to buffer the impact when his 
			tariffs or other moves threaten demand for U.S. farm goods. 
			 
			U.S. commodity farmers generally sell their harvests to grain silos 
			and co-ops, at a per bushel rate. While the impact on Waters' farm 
			is not yet clear, farmers worry any time something could hit demand 
			and prices for their crops or give a foreign competitor an opening 
			to snatch away a share of their market permanently. 
			 
			Still, Waters doesn’t think the uncertainty is eroding support for 
			Trump. 
			 
			“I really think people, the Trump supporters are really going to 
			have patience with him, and feel like this is what he’s got to do," 
			he said. 
			 
			___ 
			 
			Hollingsworth reported from Kansas City, Missouri. 
			
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved 
			
			   |