Sweeping restrictions on semiautomatic firearms move forward in Colorado
Send a link to a friend
[February 19, 2025]
By JESSE BEDAYN
DENVER (AP) — A Colorado proposal requiring a criminal background check
and safety course for people who want to buy semiautomatic guns with
detachable magazines passed the state Senate on Tuesday, clearing a
major legislative hurdle in a state that’s experienced some of the worst
mass shootings in the U.S.
If passed, Colorado would join roughly a dozen other states that require
some kind of safety training or exam to purchase a firearm.
Colorado Democrats’ yearslong campaign to ban semiautomatic firearms, in
line with other blue states such as California and New York, has been
framed by the mass killings at Columbine High School in 1999, the movie
theater in Aurora, Colorado, in 2012 and the LGBTQ+ nightclub in
Colorado Springs in 2022.
But those past attempts floundered under the state's streak of
libertarianism, including in its Democratic governor, Jared Polis, even
as the party seized and held large majorities in the statehouse.
When first introduced, the bill banned the sale and manufacture of
several types of guns made with detachable magazines, including
semiautomatics and some shotguns and pistols. Proponents argued that
allowing only permanently attached magazines would limit the damage a
would-be shooter could cause by forcing them to reload bullet-by-bullet.
But in a concession to Polis and some wary lawmakers in their own party,
the bill was further watered down last week, allowing people to purchase
guns with detachable magazines if they pass a background check and
state-sanctioned safety course. This version of the bill now goes to the
House, which is expected to pass it, and is more likely to get the
governor's approval.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dec05/dec05196288a772b1ef2fd84aec0972b13dbe2e3" alt=""
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0a4c/a0a4c682fec56fc7f0f696b85362bef39375362b" alt=""
In this July 20, 2014 photo, with guns displayed for sale
behind her, a gun store employee helps a customer at Dragonman's,
east of Colorado Springs, Colo. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bccb/5bccb64660802d0687f942127db6f63b3cfa4984" alt=""
One of the bill's sponsors is Democratic state Sen. Tom Sullivan,
whose son was killed in the Aurora movie theater shooting.
“This is the high-capacity magazine that my son’s killer brought
into the movie theater,” Sullivan said as he thrust a photo toward
Senate Republicans during the chamber's first floor debate on the
bill last week. “When this magazine jammed after 72 shots, the dying
stopped.”
Republicans have decried the proposal as a severe violation of
Second Amendment rights and framed it as an effective ban on the
weapons. Their arguments pushed last week's debate into the wee
hours of the morning.
“The founders recognized that self-defense is a fundamental, natural
right that predates government itself," said Republican Sen. Paul
Lundeen, the chamber's minority leader, before the vote Tuesday.
"The burden is on the government to justify restrictions, not on you
to prove eligibility.”
A slew of caveats exempts different classes of firearms from the
restrictions, including common hunting rifles and certain guns that
fire .22 or lower caliber ammunition. The bill would allow those who
already have the affected guns to keep them.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |