Trump officials want to ban junk food from SNAP. Past efforts show it's 
		not easy to do
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [February 20, 2025]  
		By JONEL ALECCIA 
		
		A push to ban sugary drinks, candy and more from the U.S. program that 
		helps low-income families pay for nutritious food has been tried before 
		— but it may soon get a boost from new Trump administration officials. 
		 
		Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the newly confirmed health and human services 
		secretary, and Brooke Rollins, the new agriculture secretary, have both 
		signaled that they favor stripping such treats from SNAP, the 
		Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. 
		 
		Kennedy has been most vocal, calling for the government to stop allowing 
		the nearly $113 billion program that serves about 42 million Americans 
		to use benefits to pay for “ soda or processed foods.” 
		 
		“The one place that I would say that we need to really change policy is 
		the SNAP program and food stamps and in school lunches,” Kennedy told 
		Fox News host Laura Ingraham last week. “There, the federal government 
		in many cases is paying for it. And we shouldn't be subsidizing people 
		to eat poison.” 
		 
		In one of her first interviews after being confirmed, Rollins said she 
		looked forward to working with Kennedy on the issue. 
		 
		“When a taxpayer is putting money into SNAP, are they OK with us using 
		their tax dollars to feed really bad food and sugary drinks to children 
		who perhaps need something more nutritious?” Rollins said. “These are 
		all massive questions we're going to be asking and working on in the 
		coming months and years.” 
		
		
		  
		
		But removing certain foods from SNAP — known for years as food stamps — 
		isn't as simple as it sounds. 
		 
		The program is run by the USDA, not HHS, and is administered through 
		individual states. It is authorized by the federal Food and Nutrition 
		Act of 2008, which says SNAP benefits can be used for “any food or food 
		product intended for human consumption,” except alcohol, tobacco and hot 
		foods, including those prepared for immediate consumption. 
		 
		Excluding any foods would require Congress to change the law — or for 
		states to get waivers that would let them restrict purchases, said Katie 
		Bergh, a senior policy analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy 
		Priorities, a nonpartisan research group. Over the past 20 years, 
		lawmakers in several states have proposed stopping SNAP from paying for 
		bottled water, soda, chips, ice cream, decorated cakes and “luxury 
		meats” like steak. 
		 
		“None of those requests have ever been approved under either Republican 
		or Democratic presidents,” Bergh said. 
		 
		In the past, Agriculture Department officials rejected the waivers, 
		saying in a 2007 paper that no clear standards exist to define foods “as 
		good or bad, or healthy or not healthy.” In addition, the agency said 
		restrictions would be difficult to implement, complicated and costly. 
		And they might not change recipients' food purchases or reduce 
		conditions such as obesity. 
		 
		Anti-hunger advocates point to research that shows SNAP recipients are 
		no more likely than other low-income Americans to buy sugary drinks or 
		snack foods. And they say that limiting food choices undermines the 
		autonomy and dignity of people who receive, on average, about $187 per 
		month — or about $6.16 per day, according to latest figures. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Jaqueline Benitez, who depends on California's SNAP benefits to help 
			pay for food, shops for groceries at a supermarket in Bellflower, 
			Calif., on Feb. 13, 2023. (AP Photo/Allison Dinner, File) 
            
			
			
			  
            “This is just another way to cut benefits,” said Gina Plata-Nino, a 
			deputy director at the Food Research and Action Center, a nonprofit 
			advocacy group. “It's like, how do we restrict people more? How do 
			we stigmatize them more?” 
			 
			Bills are pending in Congress and in several states to restrict SNAP 
			benefits from paying for soda, candy and other items. 
			 
			Rep. Josh Breechan, an Oklahoma Republican, sponsored the Healthy 
			SNAP Act. 
			 
			“If someone wants to buy junk food on their own dime, that’s up to 
			them,” he said. “But what we’re saying is, ‘Don’t ask the taxpayer 
			to pay for it and then also expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab 
			for the resulting health consequences.’” 
			 
			One SNAP recipient said she uses her monthly $291 benefit to buy 
			necessities such as meat, oil, milk and coffee. Martina Santos, 66, 
			of New York City, supplements those foods with fresh vegetables and 
			fruits from a pantry run by the West Side Campaign Against Hunger, 
			where she's also a volunteer. Because she has diabetes and other 
			health conditions, she said she understands the importance of using 
			the benefits only for nutritious options. 
			 
			“For me, SNAP is to be used toward healthy food to get people to 
			avoid all the disease they’re having around right now: obesity, 
			diabetes, high blood pressure,” Santos said. 
			 
			In Kansas and elsewhere, bills that would ban soft drinks and candy 
			highlight some of the challenges of such changes. 
			 
			Several pending bills seek to keep SNAP from paying for soft drinks, 
			but they would continue to allow drinks containing milk, milk 
			alternatives like soy or almond milk, or drinks with more than 50% 
			vegetable or fruit juice. Candy is characterized as any 
			unrefrigerated, flourless preparation of “sugar, honey or other 
			natural or artificial sweeteners in combination with chocolate, 
			fruits, nuts or other ingredients or flavorings in the form of bars, 
			drops or pieces.” 
			 
			By that definition, Kit Kat and Twix bars, which contain flour, 
			wouldn't be banned. And juices that contain high amounts of sugar, 
			but are more than half fruit juice by volume, would be allowed. 
			 
			Such conundrums have stymied changes to the SNAP program for 
			decades. But this moment could be different, said Dr. Anand Parekh, 
			chief medical officer of the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank 
			based in Washington, D.C. 
			 
			The momentum behind Kennedy's “Make America Healthy Again” movement 
			could spur a new focus on solutions to poor diets that account for 
			leading risk factors for early disease and death. 
            
			  
			“When we talk about the SNAP program, we have to remind people that 
			the ‘N’ stands for nutrition,” Parekh said. “It's about time that 
			both parties can come together and see what are the innovations here 
			to improve diet quality and nutrition.” 
			___ 
			 
			Associated Press video journalist Mary Conlon contributed to this 
			report. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |