Hegseth says he fired the top military lawyers because they weren't well
suited for the jobs
Send a link to a friend
[February 25, 2025]
By LOLITA C. BALDOR
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that he was
replacing the top lawyers for the military services because he didn't
think they were “well-suited” to provide recommendations when lawful
orders are given.
Speaking at the start of a meeting with Saudi Arabia's defense minister,
Hegseth refused to answer a question about why the Trump administration
has selected a retired general to be the next Joint Chiefs chairman,
when he doesn't meet the legal qualifications for the job.
President Donald Trump on Friday abruptly fired the chairman, Air Force
Gen. CQ Brown Jr., and Hegseth followed that by firing Navy Adm. Lisa
Franchetti, the chief of naval operations, and Air Force Gen. James
Slife, the vice chief of the Air Force. He also said he was “requesting
nominations” for the jobs of judge advocate general, or JAG, for the
Army, Navy and Air Force.
He did not identify the lawyers by name. The Navy JAG, Vice Adm.
Christopher French, retired about two months ago, and there was already
an ongoing effort to seek a replacement. The Army JAG, Lt. Gen. Joseph
B. Berger III, and Air Force JAG, Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer, were fired.

The removals — which came without any specified reasons in terms of
their conduct — sent a new wave of apprehension through the Pentagon.
And they added to the broader confusion over the changing parameters of
Elon Musk’s demand that federal employees provide recent job
accomplishments by the end of Monday or risk getting fired, even though
government officials later said the edict is voluntary.
Throughout the Pentagon on Monday, military and civilian workers juggled
their routine national security duties with a growing unease that anyone
could be next on the firing block.
Hegseth has defended Trump's firing of Brown, saying it was not unusual
and the president deserves to pick his own team. The defense chief
argued that other presidents made changes in military personnel.
Trump's choice of retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan Caine is unusual. Caine
would have to come back onto active duty, but he does not meet the legal
requirements for the top post. According to law, a chairman must have
served as a combatant commander or service chief.
[to top of second column]
|

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, right, participates in a welcome
ceremony with Saudi Arabia's Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin
Salman, Monday, Feb. 24, 2025, at the Pentagon in Washington. (AP
Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Those requirements can be waived by the president. Historically,
Pentagon leaders have deliberately shifted top admirals and generals
into a job as service chief for even a brief period of time in order
to qualify them for the chairman's post.
In recent decades, a number of three-star and four-star officers
have been fired, but Pentagon leaders have routinely made clear why
they were ousted. Those reasons included disagreements over the
conduct of the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, problems with the oversight
of America's nuclear arsenal and public statements critical of the
president and other leaders.
Brown, a history-making fighter pilot and only the second Black
general to serve as chairman, is the first in that post to be fired
in recent history. Hegseth made it clear before he took the
secretary's job that he thought Brown should be fired, and he
questioned whether Brown got the job because he was Black.
Hegseth has also repeatedly argued that military officers would be
reviewed “based on meritocracy." It's unclear, however, how
Franchetti, Slife and the lawyers were evaluated and what
meritocracy they were found to lack.
As a result, Pentagon workers are left to decipher whether the
officers were fired due to political reasons or because of their
race or gender. Hegseth has laid out a campaign to rid the military
of leaders who support diversity and equity in the ranks. And there
have been persistent threats from the Trump administration that
military officers advocating diversity and equity — or so-called
“wokeism” — could be targeted.
Hegseth has said that efforts to expand diversity and equity have
eroded the military's
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |