Judge rejects immediately restoring AP's access to White House but urges
government to reconsider
Send a link to a friend
[February 25, 2025]
By MATT SEDENSKY
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Monday refused to immediately order
the White House to restore The Associated Press’ access to presidential
events, saying the news organization had not demonstrated it had
suffered any irreparable harm. But he urged the Trump administration to
reconsider its two-week-old ban, saying that case law “is uniformly
unhelpful to the White House.”
U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden’s decision was only for the
moment, however. He told attorneys for the Trump administration and the
AP that the issue required more exploration before ruling.
McFadden said the AP had not proven harm requiring an immediate
restraining order. But he cautioned the White House that the law wasn’t
on its side in barring AP over continuing to refer to the Gulf of
Mexico, not simply the “Gulf of America” as Trump decreed in an
executive order.
“It seems pretty clearly viewpoint discrimination,” McFadden told Brian
Hudak, a government attorney.
With no ruling made, the White House is free to continue barring the AP
from the Oval Office and beyond. The case promised to stretch at least
until March 20, when an additional hearing was set.
AP spokesperson Lauren Easton had this to say after the hearing: “We
look forward to our next hearing on March 20 where we will continue to
stand for the right of the press and the public to speak freely without
government retaliation. This is a fundamental American freedom.”

The White House, meanwhile, began displaying a pair of monitors in the
briefing room reading “Gulf of America” and “Victory," which it
declared: “As we have said from the beginning, asking the President of
the United States questions in the Oval Office and aboard Air Force One
is a privilege granted to journalists, not a legal right."
Is singling out one news organization ‘viewpoint discrimination’?
Hudak said that just because an AP reporter and photographer had long
held a place in the White House press pool didn't mean the agency was
entitled to it in perpetuity.
“That’s not just special access. That’s extra-special access,” Hudak
said, noting that AP journalists continue to access the White House and
publish news from events, even when its journalists are not present in
the room where they happen. “The president can choose who to speak
with.”
Charles Tobin, an attorney representing the AP, said it wasn’t a matter
of whether Trump had to speak to the agency’s reporters, but that
singling the agency out amounted to a “constitutional problem."
“We’re not arguing that the president of the United States has to answer
The Associated Press’ questions,” Tobin said. “The issue is that once he
lets the press pool in he can’t say, ‘I don’t like you. You’re fake
news. Get out.’”
McFadden, a Trump nominee, subjected both sides to intense questioning.
Discussing the composition of the “press pool” that is chosen by the
White House Correspondents’ Association, he questioned why the
government was obligated to follow those choices, saying “it feels a
little odd that the White House is somehow bound by the decisions this
private organization is making.”
[to top of second column]
|

Pedestrians walk past the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse,
Monday, Feb. 24, 2025. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf)

Later, though, in an exchange with Hudak, he said “The White House
has accepted the correspondents’ association to be the referee here,
and has just discriminated against one organization. That does seem
problematic.”
The dispute is over AP style
Earlier this month, the Trump administration began barring the AP
from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other areas — some of which
have been open to the agency for a century as part of the White
House press pool.
That came after the AP said last month that it would adhere to the
“Gulf of Mexico” terminology because its audience is global and the
waters are not only in U.S. territory. However, it is acknowledging
Trump’s rechristening as well.
The AP filed suit Friday, naming three Trump officials – White House
chief of staff Susan Wiles, deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich
and press secretary Karoline Leavitt – as defendants. The agency, a
not-for-profit news organization in operation since 1846, called the
White House’s move a “targeted attack” that “strikes at the very
core of the First Amendment.
Budowich was in court at the defendants' table. The AP's chief White
House correspondent, Zeke Miller, sat with the plaintiffs'
attorneys; its executive editor, Julie Pace, sat in the front row of
spectators.
Dozens of news organizations signed a letter last week urging the
White House to reverse its policy. The signees included
Trump-friendly outlets like Fox News Channel and Newsmax.
Trump has dismissed the AP as an organization of “radical left
lunatics” and said “We’re going to keep them out until such time as
they agree that it’s the Gulf of America.”
In an email to AP, Wiles said the news organization was targeted
because its influential stylebook is used as a standard by many
journalists, scholars and students across the country, the lawsuit
said. She said the administration was hopeful the name change would
be reflected in the AP Stylebook “where American audiences are
concerned.”
The AP Stylebook is used by international audiences as well as
within the United States. The AP has said that its guidance was
offered to promote clarity, and that even though Gulf of Mexico will
continue to be used, journalists should also note Trump’s action to
change the name.

A Trump executive order to change the name of the United States’
largest mountain back to Mount McKinley from Denali is being
recognized by the AP Stylebook. Trump has the authority to do so
because the mountain is completely within the country he oversees,
AP has said.
It isn’t the first case of its kind, nor even the first to involve
Trump. In Trump’s first term, reporter Jim Acosta of CNN had his
White House credentials revoked. After CNN sued, another federal
judge appointed by Trump ruled in Acosta’s favor to restore access.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |