EPA backtracks on Trump comment about cutting staff by 65% but says
major spending cuts are coming
[February 28, 2025]
By MATTHEW DALY
WASHINGTON (AP) — Despite a comment by President Donald Trump, the
Environmental Protection Agency does not plan to reduce its staff by
65%, the White House and the agency said Thursday, though major budget
cuts are likely.
A White House spokeswoman said the 65% figure referred to expected
spending cuts at the agency, rather than staffing levels, a comment that
was amplified by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.
“We don't need to be spending all that money that went through the EPA
last year," Zeldin told Fox News on Thursday. “We don't want it. We
don't need it. The American public needs it and we need to balance the
budget."
President Joe Biden requested about $10.9 billion for the EPA in the
current budget year, an increase of 8.5% over the previous one, but
Zeldin said the agency needs far less money to do its work. He also
criticized EPA grants authorized under the 2022 climate law, including
$20 billion for a so-called green bank to pay for climate and
clean-energy programs.
Zeldin has vowed to revoke contracts for the still-emerging bank program
that is set to fund tens of thousands of projects to fight climate
change and promote environmental justice.

“I am saying to Congress and to the American public, please don't send
us tens of billions of dollars to spend this year,” Zeldin said in the
Fox interview.
White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said Thursday that “President
Trump, DOGE, and Administrator Zeldin are committed to cutting waste,
fraud, and abuse."
Zeldin “is committed to eliminating 65% of the EPA’s wasteful spending,”
she added.
The head of the EPA's largest union called the comments by Trump and
Zeldin “disheartening'' and said there is ”a lack of leadership within
the EPA."
Marie Owens Powell, president of the American Federation of Government
Employees Council 238, said she was saddened by the “carelessness” of
Trump's remarks Wednesday at a White House Cabinet meeting. A 65%
reduction in staffing would be devastating to the agency and its
mission, Powell said, adding that Trump's widely publicized comments put
EPA employees “in a tailspin.”
[to top of second column]
|

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin speaks at the East Palestine Fire
Department in East Palestine, Ohio, Feb. 3, 2025. (Rebecca Droke/Pool
Photo via AP, File)

The EPA had 15,123 full-time employees as of last December,
according to the latest budget. A reduction of 65% would mean the
loss of nearly 10,000 jobs.
Efforts by Zeldin and the White House to clarify that Trump was
referring to budget cuts — rather than staffing cuts — offer little
comfort, Powell said. Such a large spending cut would require major
staffing reductions for jobs such as monitoring air and water
quality, responding to natural disasters and lead abatement, among
many other agency functions, she said.
"Frankly, I don't know if we believe it,'' she said of
administration efforts to explain away Trump's comments. Powell
cited a White House memo circulated this week that directs federal
agencies to develop plans for eliminating thousands of employee
positions and consolidating programs. Such an effort would be
devastating to the EPA and other federal agencies, Powell said.
Democrats and environmental groups rushed to defend the EPA's
mission, saying huge budget cuts would be disastrous.
“Gutting the agency by 65% will leave polluters unchecked,
contaminating clean air, water and public health, and all but
guaranteeing greater risk for vulnerable populations like children
and the elderly," said Lauren Pagel, policy director of the
environmental group Earthworks.
She called on Congress and the courts to “stop this reckless,
ideological sabotage of the EPA.”
Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee, said recent layoffs at EPA,
coupled with Zeldin's comments about sharp spending cuts, show he
had no intent to follow through on a pledge during his confirmation
hearing to work collaboratively with EPA's staff.
“It is now clear that the fix was in from the very beginning, to
help the looters and polluters who bankrolled President Trump’s
campaign,” Whitehouse said.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |