DOGE access to US intelligence secrets poses a national security threat,
Democrats say
[February 28, 2025]
By DAVID KLEPPER
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic lawmakers demanded answers from billionaire
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency on Thursday as concerns
about who has access to America's most sensitive information continue to
dog Trump administration efforts to reshape the federal government.
The systems accessed by Musk's DOGE staffers include billions of data
points about citizens and businesses, as well as potentially sensitive
information about government payments and programs that, if assembled
correctly, could reveal secrets about national security and intelligence
operations to Russia, China or another adversary.
Musk and the White House so far have not convinced their critics and
have offered few details about their cybersecurity measures as their
tech-centered approach to shrinking government roils Washington.
In a letter sent to Musk and the White House, Sen. Elizabeth Warren,
D-Mass., and Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., demanded to know the details
about security precautions and whether lapses in security may have
exposed sensitive information. The letter asserts that reckless actions
by DOGE present a “grave” threat to national security by exposing
secrets about America’s defense and intelligence agencies.
"DOGE employees do not appear to fully understand much of the
information to which they have been given unfettered access and given
the cavalier and incompetent ways that they have handled this data,
these individuals represent a clear threat to national security and the
nation’s economy,” wrote Warren and Connolly, who were joined on the
letter by several other Democratic lawmakers.
Musk and President Donald Trump have defended DOGE’s work, saying it’s
led to billions of dollars in savings. In response to the concerns
raised in Thursday’s letter, a spokesman for the administration said
it’s vital that DOGE workers have access to federal databases.
“It takes direct access to the system to identify and fix it,” Harrison
Fields, principal deputy White House press secretary, said in an email
Thursday. “DOGE will continue to shine a light on the fraud they uncover
as the American people deserve to know what their government has been
spending their hard earned tax dollars on.”
If that information is mishandled, or security precautions fail, the
information could be exposed to foreign intelligence services or common
hackers, prompting significant worry among some national security and
cyber experts.
Groups worried about DOGE have challenged its actions in court, with a
federal judge in Manhattan temporarily restricting DOGE from accessing
some Treasury Department information until its members can be certified
in cybersecurity. Another recent ruling blocked DOGE's access to certain
records at other agencies, too.
Federal laws and regulations were written to tightly control the
management of sensitive federal data — even if it has little value to
scammers or foreign spies. Certain officials only have access to certain
data, and access to information from the same data set may be split
among different people as an additional security measure.
[to top of second column]
|
Classified data has always been subject to more stringent rules —
designed to minimize the risk that it could fall into the wrong
hands. Access to such information is tightly controlled, said
Jeffrey Vagle, a law professor and cybersecurity expert at Georgia
State University who has in the past worked on classified federal
technology projects.
It’s unknown what steps DOGE has taken to ensure security, Vagle
said, which called worrying by itself. If they store data on flash
drives, access it on a personal device or comingle systems, they
could be creating huge security vulnerabilities, he said.
“A foreign agent wouldn’t even have to try that hard,” Vagle said.
Information in federal systems includes Treasury payments that could
be used to figure out the details of intelligence programs or health
and personnel records that could reveal the identities of agents or
the responsibilities of clandestine officers.
An adversary like China could use artificial intelligence to analyze
these kernels of data to create a picture of covert U.S. activities,
said Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the
Senate Intelligence Committee.
“In the intelligence business, information is the coin of the
realm,” Warner said. “These bits of information could unravel the
very sources and methods our nation relies on to keep Americans
safe. And it could literally get people killed.”
In their letter, lawmakers cited concerns that DOGE staffers used
unauthorized servers and unknown AI programs to analyze and store
the data. They noted that despite assurances that the DOGE website
will not reveal information from intelligence agencies, material
from the National Reconnaissance Office was easily found.
The Democrats also said they worried DOGE was cutting spending
without understanding its purpose, pointing to a recent incident in
which the government tried to bring back workers it had fired who
worked on nuclear weapon programs.
Earlier this week, more than 20 DOGE staffers resigned, saying they
would not use their technical expertise to “dismantle critical
public services.” In a joint resignation letter, they warned that
many of those brought in by Musk are political ideologues who lack
the necessary skills or experience for the job.
U.S. intelligence agencies have, so far, escaped the same scrutiny
or level of cuts that DOGE has leveled at other agencies. Employees
at the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
were told they didn’t need to comply with Musk’s demands for federal
employees to list their recent accomplishments or risk termination.
Some of the concerns raised about DOGE may be motivated by politics
and concerns about its rapid pace, said Zach Edwards, senior threat
researcher at Silent Push, a cybersecurity firm that worked on
President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign.
But Edwards said DOGE's tech-centered approach could lead to
mistakes that would have been caught in the old system.
"They're moving fast and breaking things,” Edwards said, quoting the
popular tech catchphrase. “With government, if you break things, it
can take a long time to fix it.”
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |
