US Chamber, oil industry sue Vermont over law requiring companies to pay
for climate change damage
Send a link to a friend
[January 04, 2025] By
LISA RATHKE and MICHAEL CASEY
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and
gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring
that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several
decades by climate change.
The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont
from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the
first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered
catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The
state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to
Jan. 1, 1995.
The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the
state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that
the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating
“against the important interest of other states by targeting large
energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American
Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already
addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from
billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure
“accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity
in a particular location over decades.
“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30
years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress
under the Clean Air Act," said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and
deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is
unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state
can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal
government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for
consumers in Vermont and across the country.”
A spokesman for the state's Agency of Natural Resources said it had not
been formally served with this lawsuit.
Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law
Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry's way of
“trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have
caused in Vermont and beyond.”
[to top of second column] |
A small tractor clears water from a business as flood waters block a
street, July 12, 2023, in Barre, Vt. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)
“More states are following Vermont’s
lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and
cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring
that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill
time and time again," Iarrapino added.
Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the
Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026,
on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of
greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment
would look at the effects on public health, natural resources,
agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The
state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered
greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.
It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade
or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil
attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas
emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the
state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems;
upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or
retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient
weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s
modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.
The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states,
including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a
similar bill in December.
The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial
greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure
projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change.
The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would
be subjected to the fines.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|