Trump's sentencing still on for Friday after judge rebuffs his push for
a delay while he appeals
Send a link to a friend
[January 07, 2025]
By MICHAEL R. SISAK and JENNIFER PELTZ
NEW YORK (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump remains on track to be
sentenced this week in his hush money case after a judge on Monday
denied his request to halt proceedings while he appeals a ruling that
upheld the historic verdict.
Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan ordered sentencing to proceed as
scheduled on Friday, a little more than a week before Trump’s
inauguration. The judge rejected a push by Trump's lawyers to postpone
it indefinitely while they ask a state appeals court to reverse his
decision last week that let the conviction stand.
Trump, on course to be the first president to take office convicted of
crimes, can still ask the appeals court to delay sentencing or seek to
have another court intervene. His lawyers have previously suggested
taking the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trump's lawyers have told Merchan that if his sentencing happens, he
will appear by video rather than in person. The judge had given him the
option, acceding to the demands of the presidential transition process.
Last Friday, Merchan denied Trump’s bid to throw out his conviction and
dismiss the case because of his impending return to the White House, but
signaled he is not likely to sentence the Republican to any punishment
for his conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after Merchan ruled that it
“would be the end of the Presidency as we know it” if it is allowed to
stand.
Trump’s lawyers, who are also challenging Merchan’s prior refusal to
toss the case on presidential immunity grounds, filed appeal paperwork
Monday in the appellate division of the state’s trial court. No
arguments have been scheduled.
“Today, President Trump’s legal team moved to stop the unlawful
sentencing in the Manhattan D.A.’s Witch Hunt,” Trump spokesperson
Steven Cheung said. “The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity,
the state constitution of New York, and other established legal
precedent mandate that this meritless hoax be immediately dismissed.”
Trump's lawyers did not immediately ask the appeals court to halt
Trump's sentencing.
In a separate filing with Merchan, they argued that the appeal should
automatically pause the case. If it didn't, they said he should step in
and do it himself — an idea he rejected.
Manhattan prosecutors had urged Merchan to proceed with sentencing as
scheduled, “given the strong public interest in prompt prosecution and
the finality of criminal proceedings.”
Prosecutors blamed Trump for pushing his sentencing to the brink of his
second term by repeatedly seeking to postpone his sentencing, originally
scheduled for July.
[to top of second column]
|
“He should not now be heard to complain of harm from delays he
caused,” they wrote in a court filing Monday afternoon, hours before
Merchan ruled.
Any delay in sentencing could run out the clock on closing the case
before Trump’s second term begins Jan. 20.
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which provides
legal advice and guidance to federal agencies, has maintained that a
sitting president is immune from criminal proceedings. If sentencing
doesn't happen before Trump is sworn in, waiting until he leaves
office in 2029 “may become the only viable option,” Merchan said in
his ruling.
If sentencing proceeds on Friday as scheduled, Trump’s lawyers
argued, he will be appealing the verdict while in office and will be
“forced to deal with criminal proceedings for years to come.” They
raised an improbable scenario in which, if Trump wins his appeal, he
could be then subjected to another criminal trial while in office.
In upholding the verdict and rejecting Trump's bids for dismissal,
Merchan wrote that the interests of justice would only be served by
“bringing finality to this matter” through sentencing. He said
giving Trump what’s known as an unconditional discharge — closing
the case without jail time, a fine or probation — “appears to be the
most viable solution.”
Trump's lawyers were unmoved, arguing that the “meritless case” was
fostered by "numerous legal errors," including rulings by Merchan
they say flew in the face of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last
July that granted presidents broad immunity from prosecution.
“The Court’s non-binding preview of its current thinking regarding a
hypothetical sentencing does not mitigate these bedrock federal
constitutional violations,” defense lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil
Bove wrote.
Trump has selected both of them for high-ranking Justice Department
positions.
Trump will have an opportunity to speak at his sentencing, as will
his lawyers and prosecutors. He can only appeal the verdict after he
is sentenced.
The charges involved an alleged scheme to hide a hush money payment
to porn actor Stormy Daniels in the last weeks of Trump’s 2016
campaign to keep her from publicizing claims she’d had sex with him
years earlier. He says that her story is false and that he did
nothing wrong.
The case centered on how Trump accounted for reimbursing his
then-personal lawyer Michael Cohen, who had made the payment to
Daniels. The conviction carried the possibility of punishment
ranging from a fine or probation to up to four years in prison.
Cohen, a key prosecution witness who had previously called for Trump
to be put in prison, said that “based upon all of the intervening
circumstances” Merchan’s decision to sentence Trump without
punishment “is both judicious and appropriate.”
Trump’s sentencing initially was set for last July 11, then
postponed twice at the defense’s request. After Trump’s Nov. 5
election, Merchan delayed the sentencing again so the defense and
prosecution could weigh in on the future of the case.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved |