Biden administration withdraws old-growth forest plan after getting 
		pushback from industry and GOP
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [January 08, 2025]  
		By MATTHEW BROWN 
		
		BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — The Biden administration on Tuesday abruptly 
		dropped its nascent plan to protect old-growth forests after getting 
		pushback from Republicans and the timber industry. 
		 
		The move was announced by U.S. Forest Service Chief Randy Moore in a 
		letter to forest supervisors. 
		 
		It brings a sudden end to a yearslong process to craft a nationwide plan 
		that would better protect old trees that are increasingly threatened by 
		climate change. The effort had been supported by some conservationists 
		as one of the most significant forest preservation efforts in decades. 
		 
		President Joe Biden launched the initiative with an executive order on 
		Earth Day in April 2022. The proposal went through extensive public 
		comment periods and internal analyses by government officials and was 
		due to be finalized any day. 
		 
		The plan would have limited logging in old-growth forests, with 
		exceptions to allow logging in some old-growth areas to protect against 
		wildfires. 
		
		
		  
		
		But those exceptions were not enough for the timber industry and 
		Republicans in Congress who bitterly opposed the administration’s 
		proposal. They said it wasn’t needed since many forested areas already 
		are protected. And they warned it could be devastating to logging 
		companies that rely on access to cheap timber on public lands. 
		 
		GOP lawmakers introduced legislation while the administration’s plans 
		were still in the works to block them from going into effect. 
		 
		Moore said in his letter that much was learned from the 
		first-of-its-kind effort to identify old-growth trees on public lands 
		across the nation. He also acknowledged criticism from those who said 
		the administration’s approach to old-growth forests was flawed since 
		they can vary greatly between different types of ecosystems. 
		 
		“There is strong support for, and an expectation of us, to continue to 
		conserve these forests based on the best available scientific 
		information,” Moore wrote. “There was also feedback that there are 
		important place-based differences that we will need to understand in 
		order to conserve old-growth forests.” 
		 
		Montana Republican U.S. Sen. Steve Daines in a statement called the 
		withdrawal of the old-growth plan a “victory for commonsense local 
		management of our forests.” 
		 
		Most old-growth stands fell to logging as the nation developed. Yet 
		pockets of ancient trees remain, scattered across the U.S. including in 
		California, the Pacific Northwest and areas of the Rocky Mountains. 
		Larger expanses of old growth survive in Alaska, such as within the 
		Tongass National Forest. 
		
		
		  
		
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Peter Beedlow, a scientist at the Environmental Protection Agency, 
			stands among a group of old-growth Noble fir trees in the Willamette 
			National Forest, Ore., Oct. 27, 2023. (AP Photo/Amanda Loman, File) 
            
			
			
			  
            There’s wide consensus on the importance of preserving them — both 
			symbolically as marvels of nature, and more practically because 
			their trunks and branches store large amounts of carbon that can be 
			released when forests burn, adding to climate change. 
			  
			 Alex Craven, the forests campaign manager for the Sierra Club 
			conservation group, said there was a "scientific necessity and 
			public expectation” to protect old-growth and mature forests. 
			  
			 “Those two facts make formal old-growth protections a matter of 
			when, not if,” Craven wrote in an email. 
			  
			 Wildfires in recent years decimated blocks of old-growth forest in 
			states throughout the U.S. West and killed thousands of giant 
			sequoias. 
			  
			 Wildfires, insects and disease have been the main killers of 
			old-growth trees since 2000, accounting for almost 1,400 square 
			miles (3,600 square kilometers) of losses, according to government 
			research. Logging on federal lands cut down about 14 square miles 
			(36 square kilometers) of old-growth forest — and timber industry 
			representatives have said that figure shows further restrictions 
			aren’t needed. 
			  
			 Bill Imbergamo with the Federal Forest Resource Coalition, an 
			industry group, called the administration’s proposal “legally 
			dubious and ecologically flawed.” 
			  
			 “All this exercise showed was that older forests are widespread on 
			the national forest system. Most of these are already off limits to 
			timber harvest,” Imbergamo said. “Old growth forests are succumbing 
			to fire, insects, and disease, and they need management to make them 
			healthier and more resilient." 
			  
			 A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to telephone 
			messages seeking comment.  
            
			  
			 The administration's plan faced a doubtful future if it had been 
			finalized. During the first term of President-elect Donald Trump, 
			federal officials sought to open up huge areas of West Coast forests 
			to potential logging. 
			  
			 Federal wildlife officials under Biden reversed the move in 2021. 
			They found that political appointees under Trump relied on faulty 
			science to justify drastically shrinking areas of protected forest 
			considered crucial habitats for the imperiled northern spotted owl. 
			The owl has been in decline for decades as old-growth forests were 
			cut in Oregon, Washington and California. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |