Longshoremen reach tentative agreement with ports, shippers, averting a
potential strike
Send a link to a friend
[January 09, 2025] By
PAUL WISEMAN
U.S. longshoremen reached a contract agreement with ports and shippers
Wednesday, averting a potential strike that could have damaged the
American economy.
The International Longshoremen's Association union and the U.S. Maritime
Alliance of ports and shipping companies said they had reached a
tentative agreement for a six-year contract, a week ahead of a Jan. 15
deadline.
In a joint statement, the two sides said the agreement protects union
jobs and allows ports on the East and Gulf coasts to modernize with new
technology, "making them safer and more efficient, and creating the
capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong.''
They said they were not releasing details of the agreement publicly to
give union members a chance to review and approve the document. The
ratification process is likely to take weeks.
In a statement Wednesday night, President Joe Biden said the tentative
agreement “shows that labor and management can come together to benefit
workers and their employers.”
“I applaud the dockworkers’ union for delivering a strong contract,"
Biden added. "Their members kept our ports open during the pandemic, as
we worked together to unsnarl global supply chains. Thank you to the
carriers and port operators who play an essential role in our nation’s
economy.”
The 45,000 longshoremen staged a three-day strike in October. They
suspended the walkout after agreeing to a 62% pay increase over six
years that would have sent hourly wages at the top of the pay scale from
$39 to $63. But that truce was contingent upon reaching an agreement by
Jan. 15 over automation: The union worried that machines — especially
semi-automated cranes — would replace human workers.
According to a source familiar with the talks who requested anonymity
because the details had not been made public, the agreement would give
the ports more leeway to introduce modernizing technology. But in a
concession to the union, they would have to hire new workers when they
do, and full automation is off the table.
[to top of second column] |
Work is completely stopped at the Barbours Cut Container Terminal
during the first day of a dockworkers strike on Tuesday, Oct. 1,
2024, in Houston. (AP Photo/Annie Mulligan, File)
Wednesday's agreement came a day
after the two sides resumed negotiations. “This is a win-win
agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and
businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global
marketplace,” they said in the statement.
A strike would have shut down ports along the East and Gulf coasts
and would have begun damaging the economy if it lasted much more
than a week, economists said.
Automation has long been a contentious issue at U.S. ports.
Longshoremen worry that machines — such as semi-automated cranes
that don't need their own individual operators — will supplant human
workers. Even if the ports agree to protect existing jobs as they
modernize, they could need fewer workers as they get more efficient,
meaning the port workforce and the union could shrink over time.
Port operators and shipping companies argue that U.S. ports are
falling behind more automated ports such as those in Rotterdam,
Dubai and Singapore.
President-elect Donald Trump had weighed in for the union.
After meeting union president Harold Daggett at his Mar-a-Lago club
in Palm Beach, Florida, Trump posted on social media last month that
additional automation of ports would hurt workers: “The amount of
money saved is nowhere near the distress, hurt and harm it causes
for American workers, in this case, our Longshoremen.’’ Trump added
that he knows “just about everything there is to know about’’
automation.
All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved
|