Appeals court denies bid to block public release of special counsel's 
		report on Trump Jan. 6 probe
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [January 10, 2025]  
		By ERIC TUCKER and ALANNA DURKIN RICHER 
		
		WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court on Thursday denied a bid to 
		block the public release of special counsel Jack Smith's report on 
		President-elect Donald Trump's efforts to overturn his 2020 election 
		loss. 
		 
		The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals turned down a emergency challenge 
		aimed at keeping under wraps the report expected to detail unflattering 
		revelations about Trump’s failed effort to cling to power in the 
		election he lost to President Joe Biden. 
		 
		A separate volume of the same special counsel report — related to 
		Trump’s hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate — will 
		not become public while the case against two co-defendants of the 
		president-elect remains pending, the Justice Department has said. 
		 
		Even with the appeals court ruling, though, the election interference 
		report will not immediately be released, and there's no guarantee it 
		will be as more legal wrangling is expected. A lower court ruling from 
		Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida temporarily 
		blocking the Justice Department from releasing the report remains in 
		place for three days. 
		 
		The defendants may now ask Cannon to rule on the merits of their request 
		to block the report, which she did not do earlier when she granted their 
		emergency motion. They could also conceivably ask the 
		conservative-dominated Supreme Court to intervene. 
		
		
		  
		
		A Trump spokesperson called Smith's report an “unconstitutional, 
		one-sided, falsehood-ridden screed." 
		 
		“It is time for Joe Biden and Merrick Garland to do the right thing and 
		put a final stop to the political weaponization of our Justice system,” 
		spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement after the ruling. 
		 
		The two-volume report is expected to detail findings and explain 
		charging decisions in Smith’s two investigations, though the prospect 
		for significant new information is unclear given the extensive details 
		already disclosed in separate indictments against Trump. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            Special counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media about an indictment 
			of former President Donald Trump, Aug. 1, 2023, at an office of the 
			Department of Justice in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, 
			File) 
            
			
			
			  
            Smith’s team abandoned both cases in November after Trump’s 
			presidential election victory, citing Justice Department policy that 
			prohibits the federal prosecutions of sitting presidents. 
			 
			The case accusing Trump of illegally hoarding classified documents 
			at his Mar-a-Lago estate was dismissed in July by Cannon, who 
			concluded that Smith’s appointment was illegal. Smith’s appeal of 
			the dismissal of charges against Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, 
			who were charged alongside Trump with obstructing the investigation, 
			is still active, and their lawyers argued this week that the release 
			of a report while proceedings were pending would be prejudicial and 
			unfair. 
			 
			The Justice Department's decision to withhold the classified 
			documents section of the report for now lessens the likelihood it 
			will ever been seen by the public, given that the Trump Justice 
			Department almost certainly will not release it even after the case 
			against Nauta and De Oliveira is resolved. 
			 
			The election interference case was significantly narrowed by a 
			Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. The court ruled then 
			for the first time that former presidents have broad immunity from 
			prosecution, all but ending prospects Trump could be tried before 
			the November election. 
			 
			Justice Department regulations call for special counsels appointed 
			by the attorney general to submit a confidential report at the 
			conclusion of their investigations. It’s then up to the attorney 
			general to decide what to make public. 
			 
			Attorney General Merrick Garland has made public in their entirety 
			the reports produced by special counsels who operated under his 
			watch, including Robert Hur’s report on President Joe Biden’s 
			handling of classified information and John Durham’s report on the 
			FBI’s investigation of Russian election interference. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |