Judge scraps Biden's Title IX rules, reversing expansion of protections 
		for LGBTQ+ students
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [January 10, 2025]  
		By COLLIN BINKLEY 
		
		WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration’s Title IX rules expanding 
		protections for LGBTQ+ students have been struck down nationwide after a 
		federal judge in Kentucky found they overstepped the president’s 
		authority. 
		 
		In a decision issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves 
		scrapped the entire 1,500-page regulation after deciding it was 
		“fatally” tainted by legal shortcomings. The rule had already been 
		halted in 26 states after a wave of legal challenges by Republican 
		states. 
		 
		President-elect Donald Trump, whose inauguration is days away, 
		previously promised to end the rules “on day one” and made 
		anti-transgender themes a centerpiece of his campaign. 
		 
		The decision came in response to a lawsuit filed by Tennessee, Kentucky, 
		Indiana, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia. 
		 
		Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti called it a rejection of 
		the Biden administration's “relentless push to impose a radical gender 
		ideology.” 
		 
		“Because the Biden rule is vacated altogether, President Trump will be 
		free to take a fresh look at our Title IX regulations when he returns to 
		office,” Skrmetti said in a statement. 
		 
		The Education Department did not immediately comment on the decision. 
		 
		Some civil rights groups called the ruling a step backward. GLAAD, a 
		leading LGBTQ+ advocacy group, said transgender and nonbinary students 
		are among the most bullied and harassed. 
		
		
		  
		
		“Protections for the most vulnerable students make the entire school 
		safer and stronger for everyone,” said Sarah Kate Ellis, president and 
		CEO of GLAAD. 
		 
		The Biden administration ignited controversy when it finalized the new 
		rules last year. The regulation expanded Title IX, a 1972 law forbidding 
		discrimination based on sex in education, to also prevent discrimination 
		based on gender identity or sexual orientation. It also widened the 
		definition of harassment to include a broader range of misconduct. 
		 
		Civil rights advocates hailed it as a victory, saying it gave LGBTQ+ 
		students new recourse against discrimination. But it drew outrage from 
		conservatives who said it could be used to protect transgender athletes 
		in girls' sports. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
             President Joe Biden pauses during a photo opportunity with 
			Medal of Valor recipients in the Oval Office of the White House in 
			Washington, Jan. 3, 2025. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) 
            
			
			  
            The rule didn't explicitly address athletics and mostly detailed how 
			schools and colleges were required to respond to cases of 
			discrimination and sexual assault. A separate proposal dealing with 
			transgender athletes in sports was put on the back-burner and later 
			revoked after it became a focal point of Trump’s campaign. 
			 
			In his decision, Reeves found the Education Department overstepped 
			its authority by expanding the scope of Title IX. 
			 
			There’s nothing in the 1972 law suggesting that it should cover any 
			more than it has since Congress created it, Reeves wrote. He called 
			it an “attempt to bypass the legislative process and completely 
			transform Title IX.” 
			 
			The judge also found that it violated free speech rights by 
			requiring teachers to use pronouns aligning with a student’s gender 
			identity. 
			 
			“The First Amendment does not permit the government to chill speech 
			or compel affirmance of a belief with which the speaker disagrees in 
			this manner,” Reeves wrote. 
			 
			Rather than carve out certain aspects of the rule, Reeves decided it 
			was best to toss the regulation in its entirety and revert to a 
			previous interpretation of Title IX. He said his decision will 
			“simply ‘cause a return to the status quo’ that existed for more 
			than 50 years prior to its effective date.” 
			 
			Among the biggest critics of the rule was Betsy DeVos, former 
			education secretary during Trump's first term. On the social media 
			site X, she wrote that the “radical, unfair, illegal, and absurd 
			Biden Title IX re-write is GONE.” 
			 
			Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, chair of the Senate Health, Education, 
			Labor, and Pensions Committee, said Biden's rule “betrayed the 
			original intent of Title IX by removing longstanding protections 
			that ensured fairness for women and girls.” 
			 
			“With President Trump and a Republican majority in Congress, we will 
			ensure women and girls have every opportunity to succeed on the 
			field and in the classroom," Cassidy said in a statement. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |