More than a dozen Democratic AGs say they'll defend gun regulations 
		ahead of Trump's 2nd term
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [January 17, 2025]  
		By MIKE CATALINI 
		
		TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — More than a dozen Democratic state attorneys 
		general said Thursday they plan to defend two gun regulations now being 
		challenged in court, including one banning devices that enable 
		semiautomatic guns to fire more quickly. 
		 
		New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matt Platkin said his state and 
		others with Democratic attorneys general, plan to intervene in cases 
		already in the court system ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's 
		inauguration Monday. 
		 
		One case involves devices known as forced reset triggers, or FRTs, which 
		can be installed on weapons, functionally turning them into machine 
		guns, according to Platkin. The other centers on a Bureau of Alcohol, 
		Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives regulation that came out of a 2022 
		law. The rule aims to close what is sometimes called the “gun show 
		loophole,” by requiring up to an estimated 95,500 firearm sellers to 
		conduct background checks. 
		 
		Second Amendment advocacy groups and Republican-led states have 
		challenged the rules in court. 
		
		
		  
		
		“The incoming Administration has threatened these common-sense 
		protections, so States are stepping in,” Platkin said in a statement. 
		 
		It's uncertain exactly how Trump would proceed, but he told an NRA 
		audience during last year's campaign that “no one will lay a finger on 
		your firearms." 
		 
		The action comes just a day after New Jersey and other Democratic state 
		attorneys general sought to intervene in cases involving so-called 
		Dreamers, young adults who were brought to the U.S. illegally as 
		children, and coincides with Democratic efforts to push back against 
		Trump's second administration. 
		 
		[to top of second column] 
			 | 
            
             
            
			  
            The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives building is 
			seen in Washington, Dec. 8, 2024. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, file) 
            
			
			  
            A federal judge in Texas held in 2024 that the trigger devices don't 
			count as machine guns, blocking the ATF from enforcing a ban of the 
			devices. The case is awaiting a decision before the Fifth Circuit 
			Court of Appeals. 
			 
			In 2024, a federal judge in Texas held that FRTs do not qualify as 
			machine guns and issued a court order prohibiting ATF from taking 
			criminal or civil enforcement actions regarding FRTs against a broad 
			swath of entities, and ordering ATF to return FRTs to distributors 
			by Feb. 22, 2025. The United States appealed that decision, and the 
			parties are awaiting a decision from a federal appeals court. 
			 
			Joining New Jersey in intervening in that case are Colorado, 
			Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, 
			Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, 
			Vermont and Washington. 
			 
			The second case centers on a rule implementing the 2022 Bipartisan 
			Safer Communities Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law. 
			The ATF rule expanded the category of people defined as “engaged in 
			the business” of dealing firearms. It meant that an estimated 26,000 
			to 95,500 dealers would be required to get federally licensed and 
			therefore be required to conduct background checks before sales. In 
			May, 26 GOP attorneys general filed suits aiming to block the rule, 
			arguing it violates the Second Amendment. 
			 
			Along with New Jersey, other states intervening in that case are 
			Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, 
			Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, 
			Vermont and Washington. 
			
			All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved  |