The CIA believes COVID most likely originated from a lab but has low
confidence in its own finding
Send a link to a friend
[January 27, 2025]
By DAVID KLEPPER
WASHINGTON (AP) — The CIA now believes the virus responsible for the
COVID-19 pandemic most likely originated from a laboratory, according to
an assessment that points the finger at China even while acknowledging
that the spy agency has “low confidence” in its own conclusion.
The finding is not the result of any new intelligence, and the report
released Saturday was completed at the behest of the Biden
administration and former CIA Director William Burns. It was
declassified and released Saturday on the orders of President Donald
Trump's pick to lead the agency, John Ratcliffe, who was sworn in
Thursday as director.
The nuanced finding suggests the agency believes the totality of
evidence makes a lab origin more likely than a natural origin. But the
agency's assessment assigns a low degree of confidence to this
conclusion, suggesting the evidence is deficient, inconclusive or
contradictory.
“I had the opportunity on my first day to make public an assessment that
actually took place in the Biden administration. So it can’t be accused
of being political,” Ratcliffe told Fox News' “Sunday Morning Futures.”
He said the CIA "has assessed that the most likely cause of this
pandemic that has wrought so much devastation around the world was
because of a lab-related incident in Wuhan. And so we will continue to
investigate that moving forward.''
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39c7a/39c7ae0d2b4b02895624238afc4710cdacd26831" alt=""
Earlier reports on the origins of COVID-19 have split over whether the
coronavirus emerged from a Chinese lab, potentially by mistake, or
whether it arose naturally. The new assessment is not likely to settle
the debate. In fact, intelligence officials say it may never be
resolved, due to a lack of cooperation from Chinese authorities.
The CIA "continues to assess that both research-related and natural
origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible,” the agency
wrote in a statement about its new assessment.
Instead of new evidence, the conclusion was based on fresh analyses of
intelligence about the spread of the virus, its scientific properties
and the work and conditions of China's virology labs.
Lawmakers have pressured America's spy agencies for more information
about the origins of the virus, which led to lockdowns, economic
upheaval and millions of deaths. It's a question with significant
domestic and geopolitical implications as the world continues to grapple
with the pandemic's legacy.
[to top of second column]
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8fff/c8fffd69cb57168861bd295ce2cf0ec1b58537a1" alt=""
A view of the P4 lab inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology is
seen after a visit by the World Health Organization team in Wuhan in
China's Hubei province, Feb. 3, 2021. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1613/c16132e019da9d78d5b9b8dbb1cd906f78ea3994" alt="" Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., chairman of
the Senate Intelligence Committee, told “Fox News Sunday” it was
important now “to make China pay for unleashing this plague on the
world.” He mentioned imposing tariffs or passing legislation that
would repeal China's permanent most favored nation status.
Chinese authorities have dismissed speculation about COVID's origins
as unhelpful and motivated by politics. On Saturday, a spokesperson
for China's U.S. embassy said the CIA report has no credibility.
“We firmly oppose the politicization and stigmatization of the
source of the virus, and once again call on everyone to respect
science and stay away from conspiracy theories,” embassy
spokesperson Liu Pengyu said in a statement emailed to The
Associated Press.
While the origin of the virus remains unknown, scientists think the
most likely hypothesis is that it circulated in bats, like many
coronaviruses, before infecting another species, probably racoon
dogs, civet cats or bamboo rats. In turn, the infection spread to
humans handling or butchering those animals at a market in Wuhan,
where the first human cases appeared in late November 2019.
Some official investigations, however, have raised the the question
of whether the virus escaped from a lab in Wuhan. Two years ago a
report by the Energy Department concluded a lab leak was the most
likely origin, though that report also expressed low confidence in
the finding.
The same year then-FBI Director Christopher Wray said his agency
believed the virus “most likely” spread after escaping from a lab.
Ratcliffe, who served as director of national intelligence during
Trump's first term, has said he favors the lab leak scenario, too.
“The lab leak is the only theory supported by science, intelligence,
and common sense,” Ratcliffe said in 2023.
The CIA said it will continue to evaluate any new information that
could change its assessment.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |