Federal tax on firearms suppressors gone, but Illinois’ ban remains
[July 11, 2025]
By Catrina Barker | The Center Square contributor
(The Center Square) – The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act
scraps the $200 tax on firearm suppressors and short-barreled rifles, a
move gun-rights advocates praise. Critics say it’s weak reform that
keeps unconstitutional federal controls in place.
Firearm suppressors used to be regulated under the 1934 National
Firearms Act (NFA) and the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968, enforced by
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The
provision in the new law would remove them from the NFA but keep them
under the GCA.
Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle
Association, explained the move to scrap the federal tax is welcome, but
he expects all regulation to go away.
“We think the elimination of the tax is good. The tax was arbitrary to
begin with,” Pearson told The Center Square. “It was really just a way
to harass gun owners.”
Before the bill passed, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts,
voiced her opposition in a video that circulated on social media.
“Donald Trump and Republicans just included a section in their big,
beautiful bill that would slash taxes on gun silencers and slash
restrictions on purchasing them. This gun lobby tax break means it’ll be
easier for anyone to get access to these things, violent criminals
included,” said Warren.
Pearson called suppressors a “piece of metal.”
“Registering them is nonsense. Criminals don’t follow these laws anyway.
It’s law-abiding citizens who get punished,” said Pearson. “People use
them because it protects their ears. You still wear earmuffs, but it
lowers the sound level to help prevent hearing loss.”
[to top of second column]
|
Illinois currently bans ownership of firearm suppressors, one of
only a handful of states to do so. A federal lawsuit, Anderson v.
Raoul, challenges the ban as unconstitutional, and is awaiting a
ruling after being delayed pending a related case.
On social media The American Suppressor Association released a
statement saying, “After the unelected parliamentarian’s
politically-biased decision to block full repeal from the NFA,
revised Senate text of the One Big Beautiful Bill now contains a
provision to eliminate the $200 excise tax on suppressors. It is not
the win we deserve, but it is a major step in the right direction.”
Pearson explained the registry may eventually disappear, especially
after losing the revenue from the tax cuts.
“There’s a government bureaucracy at the ATF, and getting rid of the
tax stamps [the registry] would likely reduce the need for some of
their staff—saving money in the process,” said Pearson.
Pearson explained that if a person owns multiple firearms of varying
calibers, they would need separate suppressors tailored to each
caliber.
“If you’ve got five rifles and need five suppressors, that used to
be $1,000 in taxes,” Pearson said. “Getting rid of that is great—but
the stamp itself is still a waste of government money.”
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved
 |
