A Senate vote this week will test the popularity of DOGE spending cuts
[July 15, 2025]
By KEVIN FREKING
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans will test the popularity of
Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts this week by aiming to
pass President Donald Trump’s request to claw back $9.4 billion in
public media and foreign aid spending.
Senate Democrats are trying to kill the measure but need a few
Republicans uncomfortable with the president's effort to join them.
Trump's Republican administration is employing a rarely used tool that
allows the president to transmit a request to cancel previously approved
funding authority. The request triggers a 45-day clock under which the
funds are frozen. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the
spending stands. That clock expires Friday.
The House has already approved Trump's request on a mostly party line
214-212 vote. The Senate has little time to spare to beat the deadline
for the president's signature. Another House vote will be needed if
senators amend the legislation, adding more uncertainty to the outcome.
Here's a closer look at this week's debate.
Public media on the chopping block
Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which represents the full amount
it’s due to receive during the next two budget years.
The White House says the public media system is politically biased and
an unnecessary expense.
The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more
than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with
much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public
Broadcasting System to support national programming.
The potential fallout from the cuts for local pubic media stations has
generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle.

Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he's worried about how the rescissions
will hit radio stations that broadcast to Native Americans in his state.
He said the vast majority of their funding comes from the federal
government.
“They're not political in nature,” Rounds said of the stations. “It's
the only way of really communicating in the very rural areas of our
state, and a lot of other states as well."
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said that for the tribal radio stations in
her state, “almost to a number, they’re saying that they will go under
if public broadcasting funds are no longer available to them.”
To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican
lawmakers have cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a
wide range of a program’s funding as wasteful.
In recent testimony, Office of Management and Budget Director Russ
Vought criticized programming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and
inclusion. He said NPR aired a 2022 program entitled “What ‘Queer Ducks’
can teach teenagers about sexuality in the animal kingdom." He also
cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with “Sesame Street”
about combatting racism.
Targeting humanitarian aid
As part of the package, Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind about $8.3
billion in foreign aid programs that aim to fight famine and disease and
promote global stability.
Among the targets:
— $900 million to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases and
strengthen detections systems to prevent wider epidemics.
— $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and
sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own
country.
— $4.15 billion for two programs designed to boost the economies and
democratic institutions in developing and strategically important
countries.
— $496 million to provide humanitarian assistance such as food, water
and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts.
Some of the health cuts are aimed at a program known as PEPFAR, which
President George W. Bush, a Republican, began to combat HIV/AIDS in
developing countries. The program is credited with saving 26 million
lives and has broad bipartisan support.
On PEPFAR, Vought told senators "these cuts are surgical and
specifically preserve life-saving assistance.” But many lawmakers are
wary, saying they've seen no details about where specifically the
administration will cut.

[to top of second column]
|

Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., talks after a policy
luncheon on Wednesday, July 9, 2025, at the Capitol in Washington.
(AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)

The administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding
for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more
efficient and seek contributions from other nations, “putting
American taxpayers first.”
U.S. leaders have often argued that aiding other nations through
“soft power” is not just the right thing to do but also the smart
thing.
Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told Vought there is “plenty of
absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn’t
receive another bit of taxpayer funding,” but he called the
administration's attempt to root it out “unnecessarily chaotic.”
"In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies,
you’ve created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill,"
McConnell told Vought.
Trump weighs in
The president has issued a warning on his social media site directly
aimed at individual Senate Republicans who may be considering voting
against the cuts.
He said it was important that all Republicans adhere to the bill and
in particular defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
“Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue
broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,” he said.
For individual Republicans seeking reelection, the prospect of Trump
working to defeat them is reason for pause and could be a sign the
package is teetering.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opted to announce he would not seek
reelection recently after the president called for a primary
challenger to the senator when he voted not to advance Trump's
massive tax and spending cut bill.
Getting around a filibuster
Spending bills before the 100-member Senate almost always need some
bipartisan buy-in to pass. That's because the bills need 60 votes to
overcome a filibuster and advance. But this week's effort is
different.
Congress set up a process back when Republican Richard Nixon was
president for speedily considering a request to claw back previously
approved spending authority. Under those procedures, it takes only a
simple Senate majority to advance the president's request to a final
vote.

It's a rarely employed maneuver. In 1992, President George H.W.
Bush, a Republican, had some success with his rescissions request,
though the final bill included some cuts requested by the president
and many that were not. Trump proposed 38 rescissions in 2018, but
the package stalled in the Senate.
If senators vote to take up the bill, it sets up the potential for
10 hours of debate plus votes on scores of potentially thorny
amendments in what is known as a vote-a-rama.
Democrats see the president's request as an effort to erode the
Senate filibuster. They warn it's absurd to expect them to work with
GOP lawmakers on bipartisan spending measures if Republicans turn
around a few months later and use their majority to cut the parts
they don't like.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer offered a stern warning in a
letter to colleagues: “How Republicans answer this question on
rescissions and other forthcoming issues will have grave
implications for the Congress, the very role of the legislative
branch, and, more importantly, our country,” Schumer said.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., took note of the warning.
“I was disappointed to see the Democrat leader in his recent Dear
Colleague letter implicitly threaten to shut down the government,"
Thune said.
The Trump administration is likening the first rescissions package
to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes
along.
All contents © copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved |